Rapid, Reliable, Relevant and Repeated: The 4 Rs of food safety communication
Julie Schmit and Elizabeth Weise report in USA Today this morning that retailers have been slow to pull Castleberry's products that may be infected with botulism. The Food and Drug Administration reported that out of 3,700 stores the FDA visited in recent days, 7% had recalled cans for sale. North Carolina officials visited 250 stores the past two days and found four of 10 still selling recalled products. "People just don't seem to be taking (the recall) seriously," says Robert Brackett, director of the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. He says consumers may be suffering "recall fatigue," given the rash of recalls the past year for spinach, carrot juice, lettuce, peanut butter, pet food and other products. "That's a real phenomenon. If people aren't getting sick or their family isn't, they think 'Oh, it's not going to happen to me.' "
Research shows that people stop paying attention to recalls if there are a large number in a short time span, says Douglas Powell, professor of food safety at Kansas State University.
Retailers may also not have heard about the recall, Brackett says, or they may be confused about what's been recalled.
I told Elizabeth yesterday that public communications about such undertaking must be rapid, reliable, repeated and relevant, and that the produce outbreaks of 2006 marked significant changes in how stories were being told on Internet-based networking like YouTube, wikipedia, and blogs.
Producers, processors, retailers and regulators of agricultural commodities not only need to be seen -- and actually -- responding to food safety issues in conventional media, they must now pay particular attention to the myriad of Internet-based social networking sites that allow individuals to act as their own media outlet. Further, proactive producers, regulators and others in the farm-to-fork food safety system will become comfortable with the directness -- and especially the speed -- of new Internet-based media.
Trackbacks (4)
Links to blogs that reference this article
Trackback URL
http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/admin/trackback/36304
http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/admin/trackback/36304
BarfBlog -
November 4, 2007 10:10 PM
In response to a recent University of Wollongong study which found that 57 per cent of the pregnant Australian woman surveyed were not aware of foods they should avoid to prevent listeriosis, Food Standards Australia New Zealand's (FSANZ) Chief Medical...
BarfBlog -
December 3, 2007 5:27 PM
Yesterday, Bill Marler listed the top 20 E. coli-in-beef outbreaks and recalls in the U.S. for 2007. Apparently, most of that meat is either eaten, or never recovered. That's what Julie Schmit and Barbara Hansen concluded in USA Today today,...
BarfBlog -
March 26, 2008 7:59 PM
Rapid, reliable, repeated and relevant. That's been the food safety mantra at iFSN for over a decade. Here's why. Dr. Carol Byrd-Bredbenner of Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, and colleagues reported in the Journal of the American Diete...
BarfBlog -
June 1, 2008 5:07 PM
Information about risk -- specifically the microbiological risks in food and water -- needs to be rapid, reliable, relevant and repeated. Often those with the most information and the most credibility in an outbreak situation are the local medical offi...
Comments (0)
Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question
Use this form to add a comment to this entry.
Send To A Friend
Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.






