Does it suck or not? USDA's version of protect your baby and yourself from listeriosis
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, eager to groove with the youtube generation but without the grossness that thrives online, released a video today highlighting the potential for certain foods to cause listeriosis in pregnant women.
I don’t know if it works so I asked Chapman. He said the video doesn’t spend enough time on deli meats, the food that risk assessments have shown was much riskier than others. He also said it’s not bad, but somewhat patronizing, but he’s also not a pregnant woman.
For which we are all grateful.
I asked a former pregnant woman, Amy, to look at the video. She said,
“The voices are crazy. I love the idea that she had her baby while they were filming.
“Why do they pick such a boring male narrator? Like I want to listen to him tell me about what not to eat.
“He sounds like he should be the voice of the Pork Bureau.”
These are anecdotal responses. I look forward to USDA releasing the results of their video evaluation research so taxpayers can be assured these attempts at video aren’t just wasting time and money.
http://barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/admin/trackback/159391
Good point. It would have been better if the narrator was a woman, or even better all the talk was done by pregnant women.
I also noticed the term "should not eat" is better than "avoid". Avoid translates as do not eat most of the times, but one time that you might eat can make you sick with sometimes terrible results. People prefer the word "avoid" because it less mean, but it is also less effective.
Best Regards,
Constantine