February 2009

  • Posted: February 28th, 2009 - 9:43pm by Doug Powell

    Nebraska health officials say more than 80 people fell ill from food poisoning after a choir competition Feb. 21 at Papillion-La Vista High School.

    Food served at the competition came from a range of sources, including vendors and parents who had donated baked goods for a fundraiser. ??????

    State epidemiologist Tom Safranek says the illnesses have been traced to improperly handled meat, which was cooked at a family's home. ??????

    The illnesses are not linked to a recent outbreak of salmonella that's sickened at least 14 people in eastern Nebraska. State health officials are still investigating the source of those illnesses. ???
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 27th, 2009 - 1:24pm by Katie Filion

    Chester’s Chicken & Pizza in Blackburn was fined £27,000 after a March 2008 inspection found disgusting conditions in the takeaway’s kitchen. According to the Lanchester Telegraph,

    On Wednesday Blackburn magistrates court was told the inspection last March found:
    * Two dead cockroaches stuck to the door seal of the fridge, and more scuttling around the floor;
    * Lettuce stored under raw meat, posing a “very high” risk of food poisoning;
    * Staff did not have food hygiene training and had no facilities to wash their hands;
    * Food was stored in unsuitable containers;
    * There was no food safety management plan in place.


    Executive member for regeneration and environment, Coun Alan Cottam, said of the establishment,

     “This takeaway was a serious illness waiting to happen and magistrates have reflected that in this very stiff penalty.”

    A quick glance at Scores on Doors, a website in the UK to disclose inspection results to the public, indicates that Chester’s Chicken & Pizza received two poor inspections in Oct. 2006 and March 2008. The image, right, is a snapshot of the posting for Chester’s Chicken & Pizza, and indicates the establishment had poor hygiene, safety and structural compliance, with little confidence in management. Furthermore, the establishment received zero out of five possible “hygiene stars”, giving this establishment one of the poorest possible hygiene standards.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 27th, 2009 - 10:36am by Casey Jacob

    Michael Bauer writes the Between Meals column for the San Francisco Chronicle. Yesterday Bauer responded to an e-mail from a reader who had met a friend for lunch one day and explained,

    “We both became quite ill an hour or so after we finished our meal.”


    The diner wanted to know what to do if the restaurant food made them sick. Bauer responded by saying,

    “Most common forms of food poisoning take anywhere from four to eight hours to incubate.”

    It is not likely that the two diners were sickened by food eaten an hour before they felt ill.

    A handy table from the FDA’s Bad Bug Book shows that the only bacterial foodborne illness known to show symptoms in fewer than two hours is Staphylococcus aureus. (That’s because this particular bacterium produces toxins before it’s even eaten; others don’t produce toxins until they’ve been sitting in your gut for a while.)

    Even then, the average time between eating Staph-contaminated food and feeling sick is 2-4 hours. Very few feel sick in just an hour.

    A physician commenting on Bauer’s response suggested that the two friends could have been exposed to a gastrointestinal virus earlier in the week that finally showed symptoms after eating at the restaurant together.

    Rotavirus takes about two days to make you sick and symptoms of a norovirus can appear in a day or two.

    After getting a few more details from the reader, Bauer said,

    “I figured that it might have been spoiled fish, since what was consumed was fried and any off flavors might have been masked. However, tracing it back for sure is extremely difficult.”

    Depending on the pathogen, a person with a foodborne illness will either start vomiting within a few hours or have diarrhea within a few days. In either case, the last thing you ate is often not the culprit.

    A friend of mine, who is now a dietitian, has been keeping a food journal since high school. If she’s ever hit with a foodborne illness—and goes to the doctor, has a stool sample tested, discovers which bug made her sick, and remembers when she started feeling bad—she’ll have an excellent shot at figuring out which food made her sick and where she ate it.

    If a sick person can only remember the last place they’ve eaten, though, they’re not considering all the possibilities—including the most likely possibilities.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    None  |  1 Comment
    None
  • Posted: February 27th, 2009 - 5:22am by Doug Powell

    Here’s the most important point in a column written by long-time Toronto Globe and Mail medical reporter Andre Picard:

    The trial of Ontario raw milk farmer Michael Schmidt has garnered media coverage far beyond its importance.

    Oh, and the outcome is largely irrelevant.

    It seems somewhat absurd to jail a man for selling a product that clients desperately want and which, on the surface at least, seems harmless. But, hey, it happens to pot dealers every day.

    What is not harmless is Mr. Schmidt's attack on pasteurization and on food-safety regulations more generally.

    Under the guise of civil liberties and freedom, he and his supporters have uttered all kinds of nonsense and portrayed themselves as martyrs for pure food. …

    Farmer Schmidt and his acolytes can suckle the milk from the teat of a cow, a goat, a cat, or any other lactating mammal to their hearts' content.

    Their rights and freedoms are in no way compromised.

    What the law restricts is the commercial sale of raw milk.

    Mr. Schmidt tried to circumvent this fact by selling "cow shares" and arguing that his clients were actually proprietors and free to consume raw milk from their own cows.

    Whether that little manoeuvre exempts him from the law is up to the courts to decide. But it seems unlikely. After all, bar owners tried this technique to sidestep anti-smoking laws, selling "shares" in their establishment and arguing that patrons were smoking in a private club. Judges saw through the subterfuge. …

    Another argument is that meat - which can also contain pathogens - is sold raw, so why not milk? The practical reason for this is obvious. It is easy and efficient to pasteurize milk; it is not practical to cook meat before selling it, but its refrigeration (designed to minimize the growth of bacteria) is mandatory and regulated.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 27th, 2009 - 4:53am by Doug Powell

    The National Peanut Board is joining Jif and Peter Pan in attempting to save American newspapers by investing in advertizing to woo back skeptical consumers.

    In a press release and full-page letter in USA Today on Wednesday (thanks, Margaret – dp) peanut producer pooh-bahs announced they will set up shop in Vanderbilt Hall in New York City’s Grand Central Terminal March 4 and 5 to meet consumers, answer questions and give away samples of peanuts, peanut butter and other peanut items. The event kicks off the farmers’ efforts nationally to rebuild consumer confidence in products made with the crops they grow.

    Roger Neitsch, Texas peanut farmer and chairman of the National Peanut Board — the research and promotion board funded by peanut growers, said,

    “No one is more deeply disturbed by the recent salmonella crisis than the thousands of USA peanut farmers and their families. We may be peanut farmers, but we also are fathers, mothers, sons and daughters — and consumers. So we understand and share the concerns being experienced these days by families across America.”

    But is recruiting celebrity chefs and athletes, while portraying farmers as producers of all things safe, really enough?

    Noted science-and-society type, Dorothy Nelkin, noted in 1995 that, efforts to convince the public about the safety and benefits of new or existing technologies -- or in this case the safety of the food supply -- rather than enhancing public confidence, may actually amplify anxieties and mistrust by denying the legitimacy of fundamental social concerns. The public expresses a much broader notion of risk, one concerned with, among other characteristics, accountability, economics, values and trust.

    As I’ve said before, the best food producers, processors, retailers and restaurants should go above and beyond minimal government and auditor standards and sell food safety solutions directly to the public. The best organizations will use their own people to demand ingredients from the best suppliers; use a mixture of encouragement and enforcement to foster a food safety culture; and use technology to be transparent -- whether it's live webcams in the facility or real-time test results on the website -- to help restore the shattered trust with the buying public.

    The makers of Jif and Peter Pan have already gone on record saying they will not disclose their own food safety test results.

     

    Nelkin, D. 1995. Forms of intrusion: comparing resistance to information technology and biotechnology in the USA in Resistance to New Technology ed. by M. Bauer. Cambridge University Press, New York. pp. 379-390.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 26th, 2009 - 6:47pm by Ben Chapman

    KETV.com reports tonight that 14 cases of Salmonella have been linked together by DNA fingerprinting in Douglas County, Nebraska:

    The first cases were reported earlier this week, in which women younger than 50 -- and all the way into their teens -- were getting infected, said Dr. Ann O'Keefe.
    Health experts know all illnesses have been connected to the same strain, but they don't know where it originated.
    The strain has been submitted to the Centers For Disease Control and has an identical serotype to the jalapeno and tomato outbreaks in the fall 
    (which was Saintpaul) but a different genetic fingerprint. 
    Officials are reviewing detailed information from multiple victims in hopes of targeting the strain's source, said state epidemiologist Dr. Tom Safranek.

     

    In the past, Salmonella Saintpaul has been linked to tomatoes/peppers, melons, paprika and sprouts.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 26th, 2009 - 2:10pm by Doug Powell

    There was no way Tom Colicchio was going to let the brash Stefan take home the Top Chef honors; he made that apparent with the verbal dressing down of the Finn a few weeks ago.

    Carla was all Carla and simply cooked herself out of any serious consideration.

    That left Hosea as the champ. Steady, boring, even the food safety issues were minimal.

    The most exciting part of the finale is that one of my favorite entertainment blogs, dlisted, picked up a picture I had created for a previous Carla post (below).

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 26th, 2009 - 12:50pm by Rob Mancini

    I will never forget my very first restaurant inspection after I graduated from the Environmental Health program. I was this little nervous man geared up and ready to save the world from foodborne illness. Upon strolling into my first restaurant, it turned out that the operators were more nervous than I was. I kind of felt like my hero Bruce Campbell in Army of Darkness ready to unleash fury on them. This should never be the case. Apparently, the establishment did not have a good relationship with the previous inspector.

     

    There are two different types of inspectors, the black and white regulators who essentially enforce the law without explanation and the one who spends time discussing food related issues and guides operators. An inspection, whether announced or unannounced, is a snapshot in time and is not indicative of what actually goes on. It is far more important that inspectors discuss food safety issues in conjunction with health regulations. Inspectors throw words around such as cross contamination or danger zone, but does the operator even knows what those words actually mean? It is easy for an inspector to enter an establishment and tell the cook, listen you need to use a digital thermometer to verify that your burger is properly cooked. In some jurisdictions, an offence notice will accompany that statement. Sure the cook can probe the burger when the inspector is around, but do they know what temperature they should be aiming for? It is important to work with food operators and discuss food safety issues to compel them rather than scare them.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 26th, 2009 - 10:38am by Doug Powell

    The Independent reports that Tesco, Waitrose and well-known health food shops have withdrawn tens of thousands of packets of edible seeds in one of the biggest product recalls in a decade after a survey found "unacceptable" levels of salmonella and E. coli.

    One-in-50 packs of ready-to-eat seeds such as sesame and sunflower was found to be contaminated.

    The study's authors pointed out that although there was no direct link to the contaminated seeds, 137 people in England and Wales fell ill from six sub-types of salmonella found in the seeds during the six-month study. Many more ill people are likely to have not reported their symptoms to GPs. The Health Protection Agency and the local authority group Lacors, which conducted the study, warned food manufacturers and retailers to improve hygiene during harvesting and drying of seeds.

    The study was carried out because seeds – a popular snack among health-conscious shoppers wishing to avoid high-calorie chocolate and sweets – have become associated with at least seven outbreaks of salmonella in countries such as Germany, Norway, Sweden and Australia since 2000.

    To gauge levels of contamination here, environmental health officers from 317 local authorities collected 3,735 packets of ready-to-eat seeds from 3,390 supermarkets, health food shops, convenience stores and market stalls between October 2007 and March 2008. They were analysed in 32 food laboratories.

     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 26th, 2009 - 10:16am by Doug Powell

    I’m writing this while flying to Boston and baby Sorenne just let out three sneezes and a fart. Cloth diapers make wonderful spit rags, and I usually have one in my back pocket or over my shoulder. Last week I discovered another use – to control my draining eyes and nose while sitting through a meeting.

    Which raises the question: is it bad manners to blow your nose at the table, even if you’re not using your napkin?

    Helena Echlin of Chow magazine responds:

    According to Peter Post, director of the Emily Post Institute and an allergy sufferer, you should leave the dinner table to blow your nose if possible. … Blowing your nose in public is acceptable, if not very charming. But don’t do it at the table. When you blow your nose in other situations—on the subway, for instance—people can edge away. At the table they’re stuck next to you and your germs. Though they don’t have to see your snot, they may be able to hear it when you snuffle, and that can be almost as bad. …

    According to Elizabeth Bernstein, a San Francisco writer, “If a guy blew his nose in his napkin on a date, it would be pretty much a deal-breaker.”

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 26th, 2009 - 10:04am by Doug Powell

    Dr. Stephen Sundlof, director of food safety at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that the national salmonella outbreak linked to more than 2,600 peanut products could last as long as two years, adding,

    “We’re really concerned. This is not over yet.”

    That’s because peanut products, seemingly harmless as they linger in homes and the marketplace, can have a relatively long shelf life, officials said.

    The national outbreak has now sickened 666 people in 45 states and is suspected of causing at least nine deaths.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Salmonella  |  0 Comments
    Fda, Peanut, Products
  • Posted: February 26th, 2009 - 8:26am by Casey Jacob

    A recent survey by Mintel found that Americans choose to buy kosher foods because of perceptions of quality (62%), healthfulness (51%), and safety (34%) over religious reasons.

    Similar trends have also been seen in the UK and Canada.

    Krista Faron, a senior new product analyst at Mintel, was quoted by meatprocess.com as saying,

    “Particularly in the recent past, Americans have been overwhelmed by food safety scares. People are very concerned and having some certification on the foods they buy can appease some of those fears.”

    She also explained where many consumers find that comfort.

    “The presence of the kosher mark itself suggests that there is [an inspection] process in place. It is all about consumer perception that there is some sort of formalized methodology...My sense is that consumers probably couldn’t tell us what kosher meant, but the kosher mark is reassuring,” she said.

    While kosher processing meets certain religious standards, there is no scientific basis for the perception of heightened safety. Imagine, then, what the marketing of actual food safety measures within a company could do for business.

    Since a Mintel report in December 2007, kosher has continued to be the number one individual claim for new American food products.

    "Microbiologically safe" could blast it out of the water.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 25th, 2009 - 7:20pm by Ben Chapman

    Karla Cook writes in tomorrow's New York Times that the Peanut Corp of America-linked Salmonella outbreak's reach has not been limited to multi-national companies:

    Small businesses in all corners of the United States bought potentially tainted peanut products from the Peanut Corporation of America and are now part of one of the largest food recalls ever in this country. There is the chef in Las Vegas, for instance, who used them in protein bars, the packager of nuts and dried fruits in Connecticut, the cannery in Montana that sold chocolate-covered nuts and the ice cream manufacturer in New York State.

    While big companies like Kellogg, Kraft and General Mills have the experience and staff to handle recalls, many small businesses have never had to deal with anything like this.
    Some have had to keep employees on overtime or hire additional help to handle the recall-related work — records have to be searched to identify and track products, and replacement products manufactured. And company officials say they are spending a lot of time reassuring their customers.
    “It’s not our fault this recall went through,” said Tom Lundeen, who co-owns Aspen Hills Inc., in Garner, Iowa, which makes frozen cookie dough for fund-raisers. “We do everything correct and we
    have an incredibly high level of quality control, and we still have to pay for the mistakes of P.C.A.”

    Yep, exactly - this outbreak has demonstrated the complexity and interconnectedness of the food system -- which has largely been built on trust in suppliers or the results of their third-party audits.

    Jenny Scott, a microbiologist and vice president of science policy and food protection for the Grocery Manufacturers Association, a trade group in Washington, said small businesses need to know their suppliers’ food safety culture and practices, and whether the suppliers are capable of doing the right thing. Last week, she helped teach a Web seminar for 60 participants, “The Ingredient Supply Chain: Do You Know Who You’re in Bed With?” 

    Like it was straight out of the pages of barfblog -- although trying to assess the food safety culture and supplier practices is difficult, it's not impossible. Creating and fostering the openess and transparency of food production through marketing food safety, with companies opening their doors can help buyers make decisions.

    Benjamin Chapman, food safety extension specialist at North Carolina State University in Raleigh, went further. “If you’re in the peanut butter industry, you need to be thinking about salmonella,” he said. Learning about suppliers is challenging when the supplier is not local, and the layers of the national food system are difficult to pierce.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    None  |  0 Comments
    Barfblog, Butter, Chapman, Peanut
  • Posted: February 25th, 2009 - 7:01pm by Doug Powell

    The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and Farmer John’s Herbs are warning the public not to consume Farmer John’s Herbs brand Organic Basil Leaf because the product may be contaminated with Salmonella.

    All lots of Farmer John’s Herbs brand Organic Basil Leaf, sold in 6 gram packages, bearing UPC 7 73353 50002 1 are affected by this recall.

    This product was distributed in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island.

    There has been no reported illness associated with the consumption of this product.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 25th, 2009 - 2:53pm by Doug Powell

    The Southtown Star reports that 21 children and one adult have contracted E. coli at a Lemont day care in an outbreak that began earlier this month.

    The Cook County Health Department has mandated all children and adults at the KinderCare Learning Center, 12404 Archer Ave., be tested for the bacteria.

    The day care center has been allowed to remain open so the children have a place to go and not possibly carry the bacteria to other centers.

    Three children associated with the outbreak - linked to a lack of handwashing - were hospitalized but have since been treated and released.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    E. coli  |  2 Comments
    Day Care, Illinois
  • Posted: February 25th, 2009 - 7:52am by Casey Jacob

    This summer at the Kansas State Fair, I felt like I was getting a lot of strange looks. I tried to brush it off, telling myself that it was no crime to have never slopped a pig or stolen eggs from under a roosting a hen—I should still be welcome at the fair.

    I was positive there were other non-farm girls there. Probably even some that grew up in the city; I, at least, shared a property line with a cow pasture. But people just kept staring.

    I really got embarrassed when a representative from the Farm Bureau Federation started to laugh out loud and point at me.

    When it finally donned on me that I was wearing my Don’t Eat Poop t-shirt that day, I turned to let him read the back: Wash Your Hands.

    I explained that I worked for an organization that wants to turn the public’s attention to food safety.

    He seemed to think that particular method was effective. “But do you make farmers look bad?” he asked while raising one eyebrow.

    I told him we felt it was important that everyone does their part, from the farm to the fork.

    He smiled, but I think he remained skeptical.

    I raised my eyebrow today at a press release in which the director of congressional relations in the California Farm Bureau National Affairs and Research Division, Josh Rolph, was quoted as saying,

    "Congress and the new administration will be sure to consider changes to the way the government oversees the safety of food production. We want to make sure that any changes don't prove to be burdensome to farmers, who are growing the safest food supply in the world."


    I wish I could meet this guy and stare strangely at him. If anyone’s going to claim to grow the safest food in the world, they’re going to have to take some pains to prove it.

    “The nation's farming community understands the need to improve food safety, Rolph said, but the farm-level impact to producers must be considered in any new food safety proposals.”

    Salinas vegetable farmer Dirk Giannini referred to the surge in food safety action plans following the outbreak of E. coli from spinach in 2006, and explained that a frenzy of “non-scientific ideas” were putting farmers out.

    "And don't get me wrong,” said Giannini, “The farmers do not want to jeopardize anyone's health or life—we have the safest food supply in the world. But the scientific-based decisions are the ones that we need to move forward."

    Of course any actions to increase the safety of the food supply should be backed by scientific evidence, but public claims of safety should have the same foundation.

    To the farmers who grow the food I appreciate every day: In your products and in your claims, Don’t Sell Poop.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 25th, 2009 - 7:27am by Doug Powell

    Amy and me and baby Sorenne are headed to Boston, leaving Manhattan (Kansas) at 3 a.m. tomorrow. And whatever stresses come along, it’s good to remember the basics.

    Amy and me, we like to write, and we make each other better. We also surround ourselves with others who want to do things better.

    Michael McCain (right, exactly as shown) may run a $5.5 billion a year company but Maple Leaf Foods has lousy writers. They’ve got the on-line thesaurus to find synonyms like stringent, thorough and rigorous, but the writers utterly fail to explain what this means.

    Yesterday, Maple Leaf Foods Inc. reported a fourth quarter loss that narrowed on higher sales and helped by price increases, fluctuations in the Canadian dollar and contributions from acquisitions. Results, however, were impacted by the recall of meat products, contaminated with a strain of listeria bacteria, linked to the illness and death of several consumers.

    Uh, 20 dead and at least 56 sick is not several consumers.

    The same day, Maple Leaf announced that it is proceeding with a voluntary recall of approximately 1,100 cases of wieners produced at its plant in Hamilton, Ontario because the products were shipped in violation of the company's rigorous food safety protocols. …

    Under Maple Leaf's stringent food safety protocols, the Company tests for listeria species, not Listeria monocytogenes. Six species of Listeria exist, but only one, Listeria monocytogenes, has any potential to impact human health. This is an extremely conservative approach as it treats any positive listeria test result with the highest level of corrective actions. Due to human error, a small quantity of wieners produced at the Hamilton plant that were quarantined under these routine enhanced procedures was inadvertently shipped to distribution centres and customers in Eastern Canada. All customers have been notified and product is immediately being removed from inventory or store shelves and returned to the Company.

    Why is the Company capitalized? Will the Canadian economy shrivel if one questions the Company? And did Michael McCain call each customer?

    "Unlike other situations, this event occurred as a direct result of human error and did not uphold our stringent industry leading protocols." said Michael McCain, President and CEO of Maple Leaf Foods. "Notwithstanding the exceptionally low risk this represents, Maple Leaf is committed to maintaining the most stringent standards and we intend to live by those standards so consumers can have absolute confidence in the integrity of our products. We are taking immediate action and will not condone anything other than strict adherence to our protocols."

    That’s a lot of words to say we screwed up, again. But it gets better.

    "As we have seen with the wide range of food products which have been recalled to date in 2009, as enhanced surveillance becomes more pervasive in the food industry, positive listeria findings and related recalls will occur more frequently. This should be regarded positively as it provides assurance that the industry and government are acting swiftly to protect public health", said Mr. McCain.

    Who is we? What are these food products that have been recalled in 2009? The ones that contain peanut paste shit? Or just listeria ones? Who’s enhanced surveillance? Sara Lee’s Bil Mar unit had a listeria outbreak linked to hot dogs that killed 20 in 1998. Why is Maple Leaf bragging about enhanced surveillance 10 years and another 20 deaths too late?

    Maple Leaf has implemented the most stringent food safety system in Canada.

    Canada? Where they have visiting U.S. Presidents sign a guest book and worship their vengeful beaver gods with offerings of back bacon and doughnuts (go to 1:25 min in the video below).

    As I said in the Toronto Star this morning,

    "People, especially kids, eat ... processed hot dog wieners all the time (without cooking them) or just give them a quick zap in the microwave."

    Michael McCain, since you’re the face of Maple Leaf, do you let your kids eat processed wieners straight out of the refrigerator? Should there be warning labels on packages of hot dogs not to eat them without cooking to a sufficient internal temperature?

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 24th, 2009 - 3:48pm by Doug Powell

    Rachael Ray (right, sampling goods in Florida last weekend) offered up some suggestions for so-called healthier cooking in that annoying USA Weekend insert to many local newspapers, including this gem:

    "Look at labels. ... If you can't read an ingredient, chances are you should not be putting it in your body."

    Dr. Dean Cliver, who officially retired October 1, 2007 and is winding down from 46 years in academia, battling infectious agents in food and water, realized that he had come up to the solution to this very problem some 20 years ago and decided to once again share his thoughts with barfblog.com. Dr. Cliver’s proposed label is left, bottom.

    The following was originally published in University of Wisconsin-Madison AG LIFE LINES, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 2, page 6, and republished in the Journal of Irreproducible Results, Vol. 34, No. 4, Mar-Apr 1989, page 18.

    A subtle and probably pernicious trend in the U.S. food supply seems to be occurring virtually unnoticed.  If one reads the information on a food package, as it seems few do, one finds that many food in the U.S. today are composed almost entirely of ingredients.  The use of ingredients in foods has become so widespread and flagrant that one can hardly guess what will appear next on the growing list of polysyllabic horrors printed on packages.  Through insouciance or ineptitude, we have let the situation get quite out of hand.

    Labels seem to be intended rather to obfuscate than to inform.  Aside from water, which evidently abounds in these products (though who knows where it has been before it goes into the food?), hardly any of the names that appear on these lists are comprehensible to the average consumer or even pronounceable.  The acronyms are even worse.  It is not enough to know that “BHA” stands for “butylated hydroxyanisol.”  How are we to know where and by whom the hydroxyanisole we are about to ingest was butylated or whether the hydroxyanisole itself was natural or synthetic? 

    Though most consumers apparently do not read labels at all, those who do seem to have become jaded.  My son asked me recently whether the “regular”-flavored generic toothpaste we had just purchased contained natural or artificial regular.  And what about the blind — should lists also appear in Braille?

    There is little doubt that most of these ingredients are harmful, at least at some level, in foods.  Why, for example, would salt be listed as “sodium chloride” if there were nothing to hide?  Would any of us willingly be called “The Sodium Chloride of the Earth"?  Sugar now comes in enough forms to confound the ablest pancreas.  Fats are listed as though they were all polyunsaturated, without any indication of the degree of polity.  Plain, American English is nowhere to be found.

    Not only are we consuming ingredients ourselves, but we are inflicting them on our unsuspecting children, mindless of potential harm to all future generations.  Small wonder that behavioral problems abound in the society whose children have been fed ingredients virtually from birth!  For example, many young people today are probably essentially addicted to calcium propionate in their bread.  What becomes of them if their supply is cut off?  Packages marked “no preservatives” should probably be viewed with extreme caution.

    Time and the press have made it clear that the predominance of ingredients in U.S. foods is largely due to the greed of profit-hungry food manufacturers.  There is little doubt that this is true: if one travels to parts of the world where the profit motive has been outlawed, one finds that foods are virtually free of ingredients.  This has such a favorable effect on quality that people are willing to stand in long lines for food every day.  By contrast, hardly anyone stands in line to get food in the U.S. — with all those ingredients why bother?

    I submit that the time has come for action on this matter.  Consumer groups and enlightened members of the general public must bring pressure to bear on Congress and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to mandate reduced levels of ingredients in foods, probably with a view to an eventual complete ban.  Nowadays, virtually the only food one can buy that is almost certainly free of ingredients is an egg in its original shell, and we are now being told not to eat more than one of them per week.  How are we to survive on such a diet?

    American food manufacturers, in their cupidity, must not be allowed to continue perpetrating this sesquipedalian atrocity on the indifferent or benighted public.  Let us speak out now, so that those in government will recognize their duty to regulate, reduce, and eventually eliminate ingredients from the US food supply!  Let's get the American public back on real, ingredient-free food, before accumulated subtle deficiencies and abnormalities put us all under the table to stay.  Our posterity and their posterity demand this of us.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 24th, 2009 - 1:58pm by Doug Powell

    A customer at the Nigerian Kitchen, 1363 W. Wilson, Chicago, called 311 after claiming to see staff using cooking utensils to kill mice.

    The restaurant was closed Monday after city health inspectors found mouse feces throughout the restaurant, cockroaches crawling on a wall and wastewater backing up from three clogged sinks in the kitchen.

    Inspectors also found a mop sink filled with dozens of tomatoes and green peppers -- cut and whole -- and ordered them discarded,

    Chicagoans who believe a restaurant or other licensed food establishment is operating in an unsafe manner are encouraged to call 311.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 24th, 2009 - 9:40am by Doug Powell

    I don’t get the point of false fingernails. Or nose studs. Or those big hoopy earrings. They shouldn’t be allowed in food-related environments.

    Number one gross thing routinely discovered in those bins of baked buns and rolls at grocery stores? False fingernails.

    A 62-year-old disabled woman from Worcester, UK, said she felt sick after eating her favorite instant snack of a chicken and mushroom Pot Noodle and finding what she thought was two false nails in the product.

    The company has promised to send her some vouchers as compensation, which she is yet to receive.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 24th, 2009 - 1:14am by Michelle Mazur

    Do you remember how you first heard about the latest round of Salmonella in the peanut butter?  Was it on the evening news, in the paper, or did you hear about it through Facebook or Twitter?  If you’re in the under 30 crowd you might fit into the latter category.  Social networking sites, like Facebook, Twitter and MySpace are increasingly being utilized for up-to-the-minute recall information.

    During the recent Salmonella outbreak, the United States Department of Health and Human Services - specifically the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - engaged in a heavy social media push to inform citizens about the health risks and product recalls.  As a result, the CDC Social Media Center was created as a central hub for harnessing the power of social networking to spread recall information.

    Twitter is one of the sites currently used in the assortment of links.   Twitter allows users to “follow” one another’s “tweets” about what they do during the day.  The website is on the rise among medical professionals and there are accounts for all ranges of industry available.  Why not food safety?

    Federal health agencies have been experimenting with new Internet tools, dubbed Web 2.0, that make it easier to deliver information directly to the public. The "Health 2.0" movement got a big boost with the arrival of President Barack Obama, who is pushing federal agencies to use the tools to make the federal government more transparent and participatory.

    Current news about FDA recalls can be found @FDArecalls and public health updates from the CDC can be found @CDCemergency. The only snag is you have to sign up in order to receive tweets from the FDA, but hey, its free.  After all, you’re no one if you’re not on Twitter.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 23rd, 2009 - 2:37pm by Katie Filion

    During my high school days I was a proud sandwich artist at the local sub shop, a job I got mainly to socialize with friends who also worked there. Though my days in foodservice are over now, I often think back to them when reading about restaurant inspection. I remember all too well the intense cleaning done the week before an inspector was scheduled to visit, or the mad dash to the hand-washing sink when he/she arrived. Inspection, as I remember it, was not an accurate indication of how things were run in that sub shop most of the time.

    Today Times Online has an article about a day with an environmental health officer, Sara Robinson, in the UK.

    Every time Sara Robinson calls she is greeted by a look of barely suppressed fright. Caught off guard, the waiters' emotions are always betrayed by their eyes, flicking to the kitchen. They are trying to remember what kind of state they left it in, before the environmental health officer gets a look.

    The second thing that happens, moments later, is what Ms Robinson calls “a mad cleaning panic”.

    When she arrived at her first stop, a traditional “caff” near Paddington station, the waiter nipped into the tiny kitchen, no bigger than a bathroom. By the time Ms Robinson had donned her white coat and followed, the scrubbing and mopping were in full swing. “It makes them feel better, but doesn't make a huge amount of difference — they can't do enough to hide the serious problems.”

    Though inspections in Westminster are surprise, much of the reported employee reactions reminded me of how I acted when the inspector arrived. Even with scheduled visits it was easy to slip up on proper hygiene when the inspector was poking around. Sure the floors were mopped and the pop machine sparkling, but the sub shop still had violations. And after the inspection report was released our manager would discuss where things went wrong, and how to fix them. Sometimes we were even offered incentives (like free subs) for following proper procedures.

    Restaurant inspections, scheduled or surprise, have limitations, and though they may not represent the conditions of an establishment at all times, they can get restaurant management and staff talking about food safety.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 23rd, 2009 - 11:00am by Ben Chapman

    What is going on in the baseball spring training facilities?  MLB.com and ESPN.com reported yesterday that the Yankees Pitcher and big-time free agent signee, C.C. Sabathia missed time over the weekend with an intestinal virus.

    Yankee's Manager Joe Girardi was quoted as saying: "He said he wanted to throw his BP and he ended up throwing up again"

    C.C. came back on Sunday and reportedly looked pretty decent against Yankee sluggers Alex Rodriguez and Mark Teixeira.

    Sabathia had been scheduled to pitch Saturday, but he was unable to make it to the mound, fighting a virus that he acquired from his children, who had been ill earlier in the week.

    Probably a good idea for the Yankees (and maybe all MLB staff) to take a look at our cleaning up vomit/norovirus food safety infosheet.

    Update: Sounds like the Astros and Giants  also have some virus control issues.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 23rd, 2009 - 8:49am by Casey Jacob

    Minnesota-based food maker Northern Star is recalling several different refrigerated potato products after some samples were found to have Listeria monocytogenes.

    According to WCCO-TV, a former employee had already reported concerns about listeria on plant equipment to the FDA.

    I’m not sure what his role was in the company, but he told the news crew,

    “…I like to protect the people who eat this product. I've seen mice all over the place. Cockroaches, black mold, listeria: I mean you name it, you can find it."

    Sounds pretty gross, but—if necessary—most of the poop can be cooked out of food.

    A report of the recall by kare11.com noted,

    “Officials say properly cooking the food kills Listeria bacteria, but the Minnesota Department of Agriculture says often times people overlook the cooking instructions and simply heat these products in the microwave.”

    It only takes a couple minutes to kill listeria if you can get the food up to 158F. A microwave can do this quickly, but unevenly. The cold spots that don’t get up to the right temp can still have listeria bacteria living in them.

    Therefore, many manufacturers—such as Northern Star—don’t provide that option in the cooking instructions.

    However, pretending people don’t use the microwave is not a realistic way to minimize the risk of someone getting sick.

    Some have suggested acknowledging consumer use of microwave ovens by pasting DO NOT MICROWAVE on packages of foods that are likely to make people sick if they’re not cooked properly (like raw chicken thingies).

    In the case of refrigerated hashbrowns, it’s probably reasonable to provide instructions for the microwave and include a little note on the dangers of uneven cooking.

    This would give consumers the opportunity to make an informed decision on how they’ll cook their potatoes. Particularly when there’s poop in them.

    So far, no illnesses have been reported in connection with this recall. Providing more information to consumers could help ensure that’s the case.



     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 23rd, 2009 - 8:16am by Doug Powell

    Last week I dusted off some old slides to talk with an industry group about best practices in food safety. I got bored of hearing myself say the same thing about 10 years ago, but sometimes, it’s best to stick to basics.

    Risk analysis is composed of risk assessment, management and communication. Over the years I’ve studied dozens of outbreaks of foodborne illness and concluded that a producer, or processor, or retailer needs to be excellent at all three—assessment, management and communication – and if they fail at just one, they will suffer the economic and associated hardships.

    There is no doubt that Michael McCain and Maple Leaf Foods has practiced excellent risk communication since being fingered as the source of a listeria outbreak in Canada that killed at least 20 and sickened 60. I’ve said so from the beginning. I’ve also said that

    it is impossible to judge whether Maple Leaf was practicing good risk management and assessment because no one will come clean on who knew what when as the outbreak was developing.

    But that hasn’t stopped Canadians from gushing in a blindly patriotic way about how McCain set the ‘gold standard’ for reputational and financial management.

    Maybe, but communications alone is never enough, just like science alone is never enough. And precisely because no one – government or industry – has come clean on who knew what when, it’s not surprising to hear

    the Canadian federal government has delayed for months the release of notes on conference calls

    held at the height of last summer's deadly listeriosis outbreak — a lag some experts say breaks Ottawa's own information laws.

    At issue is an Access to Information request by The Canadian Press to the Privy Council Office for “all transcripts and minutes” of the crucial exchanges last August and September.

    The Odwalla 1996 outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 in unpasteurized juice was also textbook risk communication, but the company was eventually revealed to have cut corners and ignored warning signs. Will Maple Leaf undergo similar scrutiny?

    Below is an except from my 1997 book, Mad Cows and Mother’s Milk, about the Odwalla outbreak.

    Sometime in late September 1996, 16-month-old Anna Gimmestad of Denver has a glass of Smoothie juice manufactured by  Odwalla Inc. After her parents noticed bloody diarrhea, Anna was admitted to Children’s Hospital on Oct. 16.  On 8 November 1996 she died after going into cardiac and respiratory arrest.  Anna had severe kidney problems, related to hemolytic uremic syndrome and her heart had stopped several times in previous days.

    The juice Anna — and 65 others who got sick — drank was contaminated with E. coli O157:H7, linked to fresh, unpasteurized apple cider used as a base in the juices manufactured by Odwalla.  Because they are unpasteurized, Odwalla’s drinks are shipped in cold storage and have only a two-week shelf life.  Odwalla was founded 16 years ago on the premise that fresh, natural fruit juices nourish the spirit.  And the bank balance: in fiscal 1996, Odwalla sales jumped 65 per cent to $60 million (U.S.).  Company chairman Greg Steltenpohl has told reporters that the company did not routinely test for E. coli because it was advised by industry experts that the acid level in the apple juice was sufficient to kill the bug.

    Who these industry experts are remains a mystery.  Odwalla insists the experts were the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.  The FDA isn’t sure who was warned and when.   In addition to all the academic research and media coverage concerning VTEC cited above — even all of the stories involving VTEC surviving in acidic environments — Odwalla claims ignorance.

    In terms of crisis management — and outbreaks of foodborne illness are increasingly contributing to the case study literature on crisis management — Odwalla responded appropriately.  Company officials responded in a timely and compassionate fashion, initiating a complete recall and co-operating with authorities after a link was first made on Oct. 30 between their juice and illness.  They issued timely and comprehensive press statements, and even opened a web site containing background information on both the company and E. coli O157:H7.  Upon learning of Anna’s death, Steltenpohl issued a statement which said, “On behalf of myself and the people at Odwalla, I want to say how deeply saddened and sorry we are to learn of the loss of this child.  Our hearts go out to the family and our primary concern at this moment is to see that we are doing everything we can to help them.”

    For Odwalla, or any food firm to say it had no knowledge that E. coli O157 could survive in an acid environment is unacceptable.  When one of us called this $60-million-a-year-company with the great public relations, to ask why they didn’t know that E. coli O157 was a risk in cider, it took over a day to return the call.   That’s a long time in crisis-management time.  More galling was that the company spokeswoman said she had received my message, but that her phone mysteriously couldn’t call Canada that day.

    Great public relations; lousy management.  What this outbreak, along with cyclospora in fresh fruit in the spring of 1996 and dozens of others, demonstrates is that, vigilance, from farm to fork, is a mandatory requirement in a global food system.  Risk assessment, management and communication must be interlinked to accommodate new scientific and public information.  And that includes those funky and natural fruit juices.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 22nd, 2009 - 4:53pm by Ben Chapman

    I used to play a lot of video games in my spare time. I really only liked sports games and readily finished baseball, football, basketball and hockey seasons on my sega, PC and Playstation. I've won a few championships (sometimes thanks to the reset button).

    I'm not super-proud of my nerdy tendencies, but at some point in the past 5 or 6 years my video game attention turned to fantasy sports, especially football and baseball. This time of year (Jan-Mar) is the fantasy sports dead zone for me, although I'm getting close to gearing up for baseball. It's a bit like the anticipation many have for the holiday season. Emails full of trashtalk, trade offers and rule changes have been flooding my inbox over the past couple of weeks. 

    Last night Doug beat me to a post about Tony Scheffler, Denver Broncos Tight End who came back from the Pro Bowl with E. coli O157 symptoms (which may have been linked to the Western Stock Show -- infosheet below). Scheffler was on my team, Bend it Like Brady, for most of the past year. His oft-injured groin cost me at least two games this year, and maybe a shot at our league playoffs.  I really don't like that guy.

    Today, I'm taking the sports-related post -- ten Arizona Diamondbacks (including Scott Schoenweis, who was once on my team, the Berserkers) missed spring-training drills today with some GI issues.

    The team isn't sure if the illness stems from something the players ate, a virus going around the clubhouse or some other factor.

    "I'm not an authority on gastrointestinal conditions," Melvin said, but after talking with the team physician he expects all to return to practice Monday.

    Some players fell sick Saturday night, others arrived at the clubhouse Sunday morning feeling sick and were sent home.

    And if you think I'm crazy about fantasy sports, I'm nothing compared to this guy or this dude (who hired a couple of interns and gave t-shirts to players on his team)

    You can get the Western Stock Show/E. coli O157 food safety infosheet here (and they are all archived at www.foodsafetyinfosheets.com).

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 22nd, 2009 - 11:26am by Doug Powell

    I never liked the band R.E.M. Everyone who thought they were cool in university was into the supposedly alternative sound of R.E.M. Their first single came out the year I started university as an undergrad, 1981. I was busy catching up on Neil Young and Rolling Stones from the early 1970s, and thought R.E.M. sorta sucked, especially the lyrical nonsense of frontman Michael Stipe. I liked the distorted guitar of What’s the Frequency Kenneth, and the mandolin of Losing My Religion, but the rest blows.

    Mario Batali is a celebrity chef in New York who practices terrible cross-contamination when preparing food. I’ve got the video. And he’s showed up in barfblog.

    His "Spotted Pig" restaurant in New York was found to have mice and insects. On two prior inspections, there were a high number of critical violations that required inspectors to come back for follow-ups.

    So it’s no surprise Sara Barron dishes on her stint waiting tables at a New York eatery she nicknames "Hell," run by a celebrity chef she dubs "Luigi." Of all the celebs who routinely dine at Hell, says Barron, one - nicknamed "[Bleep] Waffle," after the time he demanded blueberry waffles, even though they weren't on the menu - particularly incited the wrath of the staff.

    Page Six has learned that "Luigi" is Croc-wearing doughboy Mario Batali, who's been dubbed Fanta Pants because of his bright orange shorts. "Hell" is his eatery Babbo, and "[Bleep] Waffle" is Stipe.

    And making overworked cooks run out to buy a pint of blueberries at 3 a.m. was far from Stipe's worst transgression. Barron tells of a time when he and a posse of 19 rolled into Babbo at 12:42 a.m., 42 minutes after the kitchen closed to the public. Stipe refused to directly communicate with Barron, instead delegating a member of his entourage to place his orders. He never said "please" or "thank you," never took his sunglasses off, and refused to go to the bathroom alone, according to the book.

    By 5 a.m., says Barron, Stipe and his pals had rung up a tab of more than $2,000. The meal was comped by celeb-obsessed Batali, although Barron of course still expected a tip: "Four [hundred dollars] would be ideal - four would be 20 percent - but since they weren't being presented with a check and didn't seem mathematically inclined, figuring on two was best," she writes.

    When the group extinguished its cigarettes and filed out, Barron discovered that they'd left zero: "[Bleep] Waffle had kept our staff of seven on our feet for five extra hours . . . and he did so without tipping."


    Not tipping and acting like an asshole. So alternative.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 21st, 2009 - 9:53pm by Doug Powell

    First it was Jamie Lee Curtis flogging Activia yoghurt, and its, uh, ability to restore digestive regularity.

    Now New Zealand brewer Tui has shattered one of the great myths of the sexes, with a billboard that reads, "Chicks never fart. Yeah, right.”

    A survey of almost 600 women was carried out by Anchor's low-fat probiotic yoghurt brand Symbio, which is promoting a 14-day programme to reduce digestive problems.

    The company says the programme - run through www.abetteryou.co.nz - has already registered 10,000 people.

    The study of digestive health has found that 45 per cent of women experienced gas at least two to three times a week, but only 12 per cent of women are likely to tell their friends they're experiencing some sort of discomfort, even though three-quarters feel embarrassment when it strikes during social situations.

    Sue McCarty, chief executive of the Auckland-based Via finishing school, said it was a "complete myth women don't pass wind."

    For those suffering, her advice was: Better out than in. She said women here had less to be concerned about. "We're in New Zealand, remember. Lots more things are acceptable here than in other cultures."

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 21st, 2009 - 8:39pm by Doug Powell

    Denver Broncos tight end Tony Scheffler went to the Pro Bowl to tag along with teammates Brandon Marshall and Jay Cutler but was admitted to hospital upon returning.

    Testing revealed he was suffering from E. coli, a bacteria that affected his lower intestine. The tight end might have picked up the bacteria during a visit to the Denver stock show, if not during his Hawaiian trek.

    Scheffler was released after a three-day hospital stay and is returning to normal.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    E. coli  |  0 Comments
    Broncos, Denver, Tony Scheffler
  • Posted: February 21st, 2009 - 8:18pm by Katie Filion

    Ball State University has a dining blog, seen here, to “allow the BSU community to interact and stay up-to-date with dining.” The blog, which includes a note on how to make a giant pancake, doesn’t mention that campus dinning halls are long over due for state food inspection.

    The Star Press in Indiana is reporting BSU has not been inspecting its food establishments as often as recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Indiana State Department of Health.

    According to the story,
     
    The dining services at two residence halls went nearly six years without an inspection for compliance with state sanitation requirements. The Atrium, a 400-seat food court, the Alumni Center and Noyer residence hall's dining services were not inspected for more than three years, while LaFollette residence hall's dining facilities did not get inspected for more than two years.

    Scott Gilliam, director of the Indiana State Department of Health's food protection program said,

    “BSU's residence halls and food courts should be inspected twice a year, possibly three times a year. They're not following the recommended protocols to meet FDA standards. They're not in violation of the law; they're just not following what's recommended by the feds and the state."

    During my undergrad at the University of Guelph there was an outbreak E. coli O157:H7 linked to one of the campus food service outlets that sickened at least 5 students. In January 58 students and staff members at UC Santa Cruz were sickened with Norovirus after eating at the campus cafeteria.

    Getting the squirts isn’t something students pay for in tuition, but in the past few years many universities have been linked to foodborne illness outbreaks. And though regular restaurant inspection doesn’t necessarily reduce the incidence of foodborne illness, it does get food service personnel talking about food safety.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 21st, 2009 - 3:40pm by Doug Powell

    The Calgary Herald reports that the number of complaints lodged by customers against food establishments in the Calgary region has jumped by almost six per cent in three years.

    Figures also show a nearly 40 per cent increase in the number of restaurants, bars and grocery stores closed for food violations — ranging from thawing meat to mouse droppings in the kitchen — during the same period.

    Last year, health inspectors temporarily closed 93 food outlets until they fixed the problems, according to statistics compiled by Alberta Health Services.

    Rob Bradbury, director of environmental health for the Calgary region of Alberta Health Services, was quoted as saying,

    “The numbers are huge. Our mandate is to protect public health. It’s a combination of our vigilance during routine inspections and input we receive from the public as a result of complaints.”


    I picked up on that last theme during an interview with AM 660 radio in Calgary this morning, stating,

    “The technology is out there – the blackberry I’m using to talk with you can take pictures and video. Just go on youtube and see the videos consumers have taken of yucky restaurant conditions.”
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 21st, 2009 - 2:59pm by Doug Powell

    Our French correspondent Albert forwarded a press release issued yesterday by the French Ministry of Health and Sports; Amy translated.

    Following notification on February 11, 2009 to InVS (The French Institute for Public Health Surveillance) of a case of hemolytic uremic syndrome in a child who is hospitalized in the Parisian region, health authorities have begun an investigation to identify the source of contamination.

    The tests done on the child indicated he or she was infected with E. coli.

    Among the foods consumed was frozen ground beef patties on which tests were conducted. The results of these tests were relayed today to health authorities and demonstrated the presence of E. coli. The link between this case and the consumed food will only be confirmed after further testing which is currently in progress.

    While waiting for those results, the authorities have asked the producer to proceed with a  recall of CERGEL brand frozen ground beef patties sold in boxes of 10 with a best-by date of 10/31/09.

    The health authorities are asking people who have bought these patties to not eat them and to return them to where they were purchased.


    The Ministry also has some general advice, which seems a bit lacking, but maybe it got lost in translation.

    Generally you are reminded that:

    -    Ground meat ordered at the butcher shop must be consumed that day and frozen ground meat must be used without any prior defrosting;

    -    Cooking the ground beef patties through to the center prevents the consequences of E. coli contamination. The bacteria is destroyed by a temperature of 65°C (149°F). Children and pregnant women should not consume rare meat.

    -    Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) is an illness most frequently originating in food, rare in France, and potentially serious for the very young and very old. It can cause acute renal insufficiency in children under the age of 3.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 21st, 2009 - 1:12pm by Doug Powell

    UK police officers were rushed to hospital after a suspicious substance was thrown through a car window. The Metropolitan Police said officers responded to reports of an "unusual smell" coming from a car with a smashed window in Enfield, north London.

    They saw an unknown brown substance inside and those who came into contact with it were taken to hospital.

    The officers were released when the substance was identified as HP sauce.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 20th, 2009 - 4:45pm by Casey Jacob

    Founded on the belief that "health should not be expensive," Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage grinds its own peanut butter in-store using only domestic, U.S.D.A. certified organic peanuts.

    In a statement addressing Natural Grocers' connection to the outbreak of salmonella in Peanut Corp. of America peanuts, Executive Vice President and Co-Owner of Vitamin Cottage Heather Isely says,

    "We are a relatively small, family-owned company that only sells carefully screened natural and organic products, and we work hard to source our products domestically because we believe in the quality controls in place in this country. We – among others – have been hurt by this one unscrupulous supplier..."

    The company may have learned the hard way that natural and organic products are not invincible to foodborne pathogens.

    Elsewhere in the statement, Isely says,

    "[W]e trusted our government and industry food inspection process, which usually works extraordinarily well."

    Since January 30, the fresh ground peanut butter made in Vitamin Cottage stores has contained peanuts from a new supplier, Hampton Farms.

    "To further reassure our customers," Isely states, "we are now testing each lot of the new peanut butter stock for salmonella. We are working to find even more ways of keeping our customers safe."

    Way to be proactive... now that you have to.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 20th, 2009 - 4:18pm by Doug Powell

    The Pennsylvania Department of Health is warning consumers who purchased raw milk from Dean Farms in New Castle, Lawrence County, doing business as Pasture Maid Creamery, LLC, to immediately discard the raw milk due to potential bacterial contamination.

    Recently, individuals who consumed raw milk purchased from Dean Farms were found to have gastrointestinal illness due to Campylobacter, a bacterial infection. Since January 23, a total of six confirmed cases of Campylobacter infection have been reported among raw milk drinkers in four unrelated households in western Pennsylvania. The investigation is ongoing.

    The Department of Health today recommended the owner stop selling raw milk for human consumption, and the owner has agreed to stop selling at this time. In cooperation with the Department of Agriculture, the dairy is providing raw milk samples to be tested for bacterial pathogens.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 20th, 2009 - 4:11pm by Doug Powell

    Local health-types are a bit miffed that UK gazillionaire Damon Buffini decided to punish the inflated egos – and bellies – of his staff by sending out for more than 100 McDonald's burgers, waiting two days and then providing the aged burgers for a staff lunch.

    Buffini apparently told the gathered staffers he was tired of their poor attitude, reminded them how lucky they had been in life, and that lunch would not be taken at any of the smart restaurants in and around Covent Garden. Instead, they were told to eat their 'two-day-old' burgers and reflect on how fortunate they all were to still have their jobs.

    The burgers were apparently reheated.

    Andrew Hamadanian, senior communication officer for the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, said,

    “Without knowing the specific details, McDonald's and other fast food are made to be eaten straight away. We would not encourage eating food that may not have been stored properly between purchase and consumption.”
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 19th, 2009 - 4:28pm by Katie Filion

    72-year old David Maupin, right, passed away after contracting Staphylococcus aureus intoxication from an Easter dinner he ate at a Louisville restaurant, according to Wave 33 TV.

    On March 23, 2008, Maupin, his wife, brother, and sister-in-law all ate Easter Dinner at the Claudia Sanders Dinner House. Two days later he died.

    The restaurant was closed for three days. After an investigation by the North Central Public Health Department, it was determined that hams being served that day were contaminated with the Staphylococcus aureus. Toxins produced when the bacteria grows causes food poisoning, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Bob Silverthorn, Jr., the Maupin family’s Attornery, said,

    "[Y]ou just don't expect to go to your Easter Dinner or whatever and then the next couple of days somebody is gone because of something they ate. “


    He continued,

    “You know when you do an autopsy, stool sample, death certificate, FDA examination of food products, it all ties this together. I think [the restaurant] is going to have a very difficult time in light of all the scientific data that we have and will be presenting."

    Food handlers are usually the main source of food contamination in outbreaks, however equipment and environmental surfaces can also be sources of contamination with Staphylococcus aureus.

    Often foods that are not kept at proper temperatures, not kept hot enough (60°C, 140°F, or above) or cold enough (7.2°C, 45°F, or below), provide a good environment for certain strains of Staphylococcus aureus to produce enterotoxins, which in turn cause intoxication if this food is ingested by humans.

    The most common symptoms of staphylococcal food poisoning include nausea, vomiting and abdominal cramps. The onset of symptoms is rapid, and usually runs a short course, however on rare occasions death from staphylococcal food poisoning has occurred.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 19th, 2009 - 8:17am by Casey Jacob

    I knew Mom wanted us to have dinner with the family, so when my stomach started growling on the four-hour drive to her house I dutifully chose a strawberry milk at the truck stop over the fried chicken I knew was at the counter.

    My husband and I both got a bottle of pink moo juice (which is markedly different from yellow cow water) and one was past its “Use by” date.

    When I walked back in to tell the cashier, she simply said, “Ew,” and held out her hand for the offending product while I went to get a new one.

    I knew the date on the bottle told me when my drink would taste the best; it didn’t really say much about whether it was safe.

    Safety is a result of a product’s history.

    Brett Lucht and William Euler -- chemistry professors at the University of Rhode Island – came up with a nearly invisible dye that will turn red when a package of food gets above 40 F.

    That could tell me whether a bottle of milk was likely to be safe before I bought it.

    The professors also have a patent for a two-bar code system that uses one made with color-changing dye to mask the one that’s typically scanned at the checkout when the product has warmed up too much.

    Sounds pretty cool. I wonder which manufacturers would be willing to use it?
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 18th, 2009 - 3:42pm by Ben Chapman

    SunHerald.com is reporting an outbreak of Salmonella at a maximum security prison in Jackson County, Mississippi:

    The state Health Department is currently trying to determine what food could’ve caused a salmonella outbreak at the maximum-security jail this week.
    The outbreak sent five inmates to the hospital, though only one remains hospitalized, officials said.
    Jackson County Sheriff Mike Byrd said the inmates started getting sick, suffering mostly from diarrhea and abdominal cramps, on Monday, with two the inmates experiencing a low-grade fever. The sheriff said the jail gets its food from an international food services company.

    He said the ingestion of peanuts or peanut butter has been ruled out as the possible cause of the illness. He said, so far, officials believe the potentially life-threatening bacterial infection could’ve been caused by some lettuce that the food services company provided and the inmates ingested.
    The Sun Herald updates this story in Thursday’s edition.

    Lettuce and leafy greens have most often been associated with pathogenic E. coli in outbreaks, but food handlers have been known to shed Salmonella without showing symptoms.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Salmonella  |  0 Comments
    Barfblog, Jail
  • Posted: February 18th, 2009 - 3:12pm by Doug Powell

    It’s Oscar time and I can’t wait to see which celebrities have to get vaccinated for hepatitis A this year after the parties. But until Sunday, soccer seems to be the source of reminders to get vaccinated against hepatitis A, which is transmitted via human poop.

    RC Recreativo de Huelva are set to be without Spain Under-21 midfielder Sisi (right) for at least the next six weeks after the 22-year-old was diagnosed with hepatitis A.

    Sisi is not the first U21 international to contract hepatitis A this year. Germany's Ashkan Dejagah was diagnosed with the same condition in early February and his club – VfL Wolfsburg – are resigned to losing him for a "very long time".

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Hepatitis A  |  0 Comments
    Sisi, Soccer, Spain, Vaccine
  • Posted: February 17th, 2009 - 12:35pm by Doug Powell

    Elizabeth Payne, of the Ottawa Citizen's editorial board, writes that when the president of Peanut Corp. of America was hauled in front of a congressional hearing in Washington last week, Canadians should have been paying attention.

    And cringing.

    Few things have underlined the gap in the way our two countries approach food safety like the sight of company president Stewart Parnell sitting with arms folded while a congressman, in a theatrical flourish, offered him some of his company's tainted peanut products. Mr. Parnell's company is at the centre of a salmonella outbreak that has sickened 600 people and may have killed eight in recent months.

    On this side of the border, Michael McCain of Maple Leaf Foods was named Business News Maker of the Year -- a year in which his company was found to be the source of a listeriosis outbreak linked to 20 deaths and hundreds of illnesses. To be fair, Mr. McCain took responsibility in a way that Peanut Corp. executives did not. He deserved recognition for his compassion and efforts to reassure a rattled public that it was safe to go back to the deli counter.


    But that should not be the end of the story. The aggressive effort in the U.S. to quickly get questions answered about the tainted peanut outbreak there is instructive.

    Payne goes on to say that already Americans know more about the mechanics and timeline of this salmonella outbreak than Canadians do about the gaps and failures than may have exacerbated the listeriosis outbreak.

    Nearly seven months later, Canadians still don't know exactly who knew what when. There have been no answers to the crucial question of whether a quicker response could have saved lives and how a similar tragedy could be prevented or contained sooner. Until we know that, nothing has been learned from the 20 deaths. Instead of answers, we got a PR campaign, tasteless cold-cut jokes and a toothless and too-late investigation into what happened.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 16th, 2009 - 10:17pm by Doug Powell

    An editorial in Tuesday’s N.Y. Times about the now bankrupt Peanut Corporation of America and its Salmonella shitfest is long on outrage but short on imagination.

    “While most successful food producers are far more diligent — big name-brand peanut butter is considered safe, for example — American consumers have faced far too many food-supply emergencies in the last few years.”

    Is ConAgra a big food company? Wasn’t Peter Pan peanut butter the source of a huge Samonella outbreak in 2007?

    “Congress needs to find more money for inspectors, especially at the Food and Drug Administration.”

    Maybe, but lots of federal and state inspectors, along with the best and brightest the Ponzi scheme of food safety auditing had to offer all seemed to miss the problems at PCA. If someone wants to break the law and ship Salmonella-contaminated product, it’s going to happen.

    “President Obama promised during the campaign to create a government that does a better job of protecting the American consumer. The nation’s vulnerable food supply is a healthy place to start.”

    Government has a role. But nowhere did the Times editorial mention the power of consumer choice that would be unleashed if food producers would truthfully market their microbial food safety programs, coupled with behavioral-based food safety systems that foster food safety culture from farm-to-fork. The best producers and processors will go far beyond the lowest common denominator of government and should be rewarded in the marketplace.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 16th, 2009 - 4:16am by Doug Powell

    The folks that run Canada’s largest grocery store chain – Loblaw Companies --are apparently just learning about pest control. They are also learning that consumers can take pictures with their cell phones and can actually use those phones to call local health types.

    The Calgary Herald reports that public complaints prompted health inspectors to visit the Westwinds location of the Real Canadian Superstore 17 times in just over a year before it was ordered closed Tuesday after the discovery of live mice, rodent feces and gnawed packaging.

    Rick Holley, a microbiology professor in the University of Manitoba's department of food science, believes shoppers have every reason to be squeamish at the thought of mice scampering over produce or gnawing on potato chip bags.

    "Mice are vectors for salmonella. They carry it and shed it not unlike chicken, cattle or hogs.”

    Doug Powell, an associate professor of food safety at Kansas State University, said,

    "People might think, 'What's the big deal about a little mouse poop?' But it's an indicator there could be a whole lot else going on.”


    The incident comes weeks after a Loblaws store in Toronto -- part of the same company as the Superstore chain -- was shut down after a "heavy infestation"of mice and rats, including droppings on sandwich counters, was found.

    Company spokeswoman Inge van den Berg said the two occurrences have prompted the store to revamp its pest control procedures.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 15th, 2009 - 6:56am by Doug Powell

    Valentine’s Day isn’t so much about the chocolate or the candlelight or the bling; it’s a reminder of the kind words that should be shared between lovers all the other days of the year.

    I didn’t get that off a greeting card.

    Finding the right words can be rewarding. As Jimmy Buffett sings,

    “But the right word at the right time
    May get me a little hug
    That’s the difference between lightening
    And a harmless lightening bug.”


    Barry Glassner, a sociology professor at the University of Southern California, said
    many more children will die from being hit by lightning than tainted peanut butter, which has so far killed nine and sickened 636 people.

    "Are you going to prohibit your child from going outside every time it rains? If you're rational, what you'll do is, if there's lightning outside, you'll keep them in, and when that's done, you let them go out safely and go to school in the rain. I think this is the same thing. It's very reasonable to take peanut butter off the menu until we knew what was going on, but then it's not anymore."

    Risk comparisons are risky. I’m not sure how lightening compares to the deliberate, criminal, douchebaggery of knowingly sending out product laced with Salmonella.

    Associate Professor Mark Kantor with the Department of Nutrition and Food Science at the University of Maryland blamed the current outbreak on former U.S. president Ronald Reagan (1980-1988).

    "The current problem of salmonella in peanuts can be traced back to the Reagan presidency when a nationwide climate of deregulation began.”

    If someone like Stewart Parnell, CEO of Peanut Corporation of America, wants to break the law, it will get broken, regardless of who is President.

    Others have exploited the survey route for instant news coverage.

    On Thursday, a couple of PR firms released an online survey showed that 23 percent of consumers questioned said the most recent food scare would change their long-term buying habits.

    “Almost all of the 501 consumers surveyed (93 percent) said they had recently read about or heard of food safety issues and recalls.”

    This is not news. It’s an Internet survey to apparently draw attention to “Burson-Marsteller’s expertise in food communications and product recalls.”

    These are the same people who brag, Burson Helps Old Navy Celebrate the "First Official Day of Flip-Flops"

    In Seabrook, Texas, Dayna Steele is more worried that her 9-year-old son will become sick if he doesn't eat peanut butter. After years of trying to get him to eat other foods, his pediatrician said, "He's fine. Let him eat all the peanut butter he wants. When he meets a girl, he'll start eating something else."

    Feel the Valentine’s Day love.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 14th, 2009 - 10:13pm by Ben Chapman

    A story in Sunday's Washington Post details some of the inner-workings of Peanut Corp of America's operations. One of the interviewees, David Brooks, a former buyer for a snack company, spoke to the culture of the family business:

    Even as PCA was rapidly expanding, a former buyer for a major snack manufacturer said the Parnells found success by operating a low-cost business that relied on the cheapest peanuts they could find. They used minimum wage labor and a bare-bones front office.

    "The old man [Hugh Parnell Sr.] used to look for distressed situations: Someone over-inventoried or had peanuts from last year that they had to move," said David Brooks, who was a buyer for a snack company that refused to purchase from Parnell because of concerns about sanitation and what he called the "culture" of the family business. "He would aggressively look for these, making phone calls, hunting people down. Stewart grew up in that and was the same way."

    On three occasions in the mid-1980s, Brooks inspected PCA's Gorman plant to determine whether to buy its peanut products, he said. Each time, he gave the plant a failing grade.

    "It was just filthy," said Brooks, who has since retired from the food business. "Dust was all over the beams, the braces of the building. The roofs leaked, the windows would be open, and birds would fly through the building. . . . It was just a time bomb waiting to go off, and everybody in the peanut industry in Georgia, Virginia and Texas -- they all knew."

    Parnell ran PCA from a converted garage behind his home in a wooded, upscale suburb. Earlier this week, kayaks and a covered powerboat sat in the driveway next to the two-story building. A sun-faded banner with a picture of a squirrel hangs nearby from Parnell's house reading "Welcome to the Nut House."

    Earlier this week I was on the Gil Gross Program, AM 810 San Francisco, talking about food safety culture, barfblog and our ideas on marketing food safety. Gil was all over the marketing to consumers idea.

    Gil got that even if there was more oversight and inspection that something else is needed to push food safety along and was running with the idea that consumers can pressure industry to share more info -- and demonstrate their food safety culture.  I told him that there are lots of consumers looking for and able to handle more information about food safety, just saying that "we have a good food safety system" isn't good enough anymore.  It's time for companies doing a good job on food safety to back it up and open their doors (post test results, put up web cams) and recapture some of the lost trust.  You can listen to the interview here.

    And for your weekend peanut butter-related YouTube clip, here's a somewhat creepy video of a The Marathon's 1961 hit, peanut butter (watch until at least 13 seconds into it for the creepiness).

     

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Food Safety Culture  |  0 Comments
    None
  • Posted: February 14th, 2009 - 10:32am by Doug Powell

    Denver Public Health reported Friday that the number of E.coli cases in an outbreak possibly linked to last month's National Western Stock Show has reached 27. Seven new cases have been discovered this week, with three reported on Wednesday and another four Thursday.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 13th, 2009 - 1:23pm by Casey Jacob

    In an op-ed published on Marler Blog today titled, The market for peanuts: Why food in the U.S. may never be safe, Denis W. Stearns seemed to list three reasons why there is little economic incentive for producers to make food that is safer than that of any other producer.

    Stearns argued that the culture pervading Peanut Corporation of America was a perfect example of those ideas at work.

    1. To begin with, there is no such thing as a “free” market for food…

    Consumers want safe food, but cannot tell if a food is hazard-free before purchase and therefore cannot discriminately buy only safe brands.

    Stearns referred to a New York Times article that described “the array of poor work conditions and safety flaws” hidden behind the plant’s walls that was not perceived in its products until hundreds were sickened.

    2. [R]egulations can impose a predictable cost that companies can meet, but need not exceed.

    An incident/outbreak linked to one producer can turn consumers off the entire product-category, regardless of how far above and beyond regulations unassociated producers go to ensure safety.

    In the same vein, George Akerlof was quoted as saying “there is an incentive for sellers to market poor quality merchandise since the returns for good quality accrue mainly to the entire group…rather than to the individual seller.”

    3. Finally, there is the important issue of traceability—or, in the case of the United States, the stunning lack of it.

    If it is not likely that an incident/outbreak will be traced back to the producer responsible, the possibility of making a profit from a contaminated food may be greater than the chance they’ll get caught.

    Stearns cited e-mails by Peanut Corp. president Stewart Parnell in which he directed that contaminated produce be shipped: "I go thru this about once a week. I will hold my breath .... again."

    Stearns closed with this:

    [A]t this point, after outbreak after outbreak after outbreak, is it possible that finally, once and for all, the case for the effective regulation of the food industry has been incontestably made?

    I can only hope so.

    Because until the market for peanuts—and other food—is made to work for the benefit of the public health, the big profits will continue to go to the companies that cheat, cut corners, and do not care.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 13th, 2009 - 10:35am by Katie Filion

    I love Valentine's Day. It’s not that I’m a romantic, but that most years it was an excuse to get drunk, and last year a dude even ran through my Calculus class in nothing but a diaper and wings. Valentine's Day is always a hoot.

    This year I’ve spent time in candy aisles rather than calculus lectures, scanning for recalled Valentine's chocolate linked to the current Salmonella outbreak. As I wrote in bites,

        With over 600 ill and 9 deaths linked to peanut paste produced by the Peanut Corp. of America, consumers may opt to give flowers rather than sweets on February 14. Of the 2000 peanut products recalled, over 670 contain chocolate. The popular peanut-chocolate combination is found in chocolate trays, bars, snack mixes, cookies, pies, and more, all examples of recalled products, and all popular Valentine's gifts. 

    The Walgreens pharmacy and Wal-Mart superstore in Manhattan, Kansas, both featured prominent Valentine’s Day displays during the past week. Aisle after aisle was stocked with pink and red packaged peanut-chocolate treats, but nowhere was there mention to the safety of these items. A concerned consumer wishing to purchase these must either scan the 68 pages of chocolate products recalled on the FDA website, or trust that potentially contaminated products have been removed from store shelves. But with the recall list growing daily, consumers may find it difficult to assume the chocolate-covered peanuts that are safe today won’t be added to the recall list tomorrow. 

    Keith Warriner, a food microbiologist at the University of Guelph in Canada, explained last week via email, the concerns associated with Salmonella in chocolate products. “Because chocolate is high in fat it protects Salmonella from environmental stress and stomach acid,” said Dr. Warriner. “So in effect, if chocolate does become contaminated, Salmonella survives longer and only needs to be present in low numbers to survive passage through the stomach.”

    Chocolate is a not uncommon vector for Salmonella. In 2006 both Cadbury and Hershey brand chocolate products were associated with separate Salmonella contamination. Cadbury recalled over 1 million chocolate bars in the UK after more than 40 consumers were sickened, and 3 were hospitalized due to Salmonella contamination from poor plant sanitation. A few months later, Hershey Canada recalled candy products due to possible Salmonella contamination, and though there were no reported illnesses, some of this recalled Hershey product re-entered the marketplace two years later.

    Though I didn’t see any of the recalled products while shopping, it’s hard to be certain none were missed with over 670 products being recalled. I also didn’t see any signs informing consumers about the safety of the sweets in these aisles. If a store is confident recalled peanut-products have been removed from shelves, a way to help out consumers is putting up some signs in the aisles. 
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 12th, 2009 - 10:09pm by Doug Powell

    The Denver Department of Health says three more cases of E. coli have been discovered in the past week in an outbreak believed to have started at the National Western Stock Show, bringing the total number of cases to 23.

    Many of the cases are in children along the Front Range, from Boulder to El Paso County.

    Several of the sick children go to day care and at least two of the cases appear to have happened after ill children came into contact with other sick children, according to the Colorado Department of Health and Environment (CDPHE).

    It is unclear how the E. coli first spread at the Stock Show.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 12th, 2009 - 6:57pm by Ben Chapman

    AP is reporting that the Texas Department of State Health Services has ordered a recall of everything ever produced at Peanut Corp of America's plant in Plainview TX.

    The order came Thursday evening from the Department of State Health Services. The agency says "dead rodents, rodent excrement and bird feathers" were discovered Wednesday in a crawl space above a production area.

    A state inspection also found that the unit's air handling system was pulling debris from the infested crawl space into production areas.

    The plant began operating in March 2005 but was shut down earlier this week.

    The health department order also requires the plant to stop producing and distributing food products.

    This will lead to more recalls -- the FDA's searchable database already lists over 2000.

    Some choice quotes:

    Robert Grauer, president of In a Nut Shell, a San Leandro, Calif., said he's not taking any chances. The company has about 200 cases of peanuts from the Texas plant, and has to decided to hold them in storage.

    "We're not going to take a chance risking our customers — not over some peanuts."


    Ken Werner, owner of Werner Gourmet Meat Snacks Inc. in Tillamook, Ore., said fewer than 20 of his company's roughly 100 products contain peanuts. He recalled trail mixes and peanuts that were covered under earlier recalls linked to the Georgia plant. But he hadn't yet recalled any products linked to the Texas plant.

    "We're waiting to hear from the FDA as far as a recall," he said. "If they issue a recall, we'll recall more products."

    The Bergin Fruit & Nut Co. in St. Paul, Minn., has had nearly 2,000 pounds of raw redskin and blanched peanuts on hold since late January, when Peanut Corp. issued an expanded recall that included products produced at its Georgia plant as far back as 2007, said quality control manager Bill Jaspers.

    "We will probably be destroying it because, frankly, I think PCA has got bigger problems than a product recall," he said.

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 12th, 2009 - 10:05am by Doug Powell

    Katie Filion will be giving a departmental seminar this afternoon about restaurant inspection disclosure systems, research needs, and how to make them better. Katie’s been accepted into graduate school at Kansas State beginning in May 2009, and is working in my lab until then.

    For those in Manhattan (Kansas), Katie’s talk is at 3:30 p.m. in the Practice Management Center, 4th Floor, Trotter Hall, Kansas State University. The slides Katie will be using are available below.


    barfblog.foodsafety.ksu.edu/uploads/file/Show me the score - Feb 2009.ppt

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 11th, 2009 - 8:04pm by Doug Powell

    There’s no ice hockey in Manhattan (Kansas) but we do get the NHL channel, and a hockey game can make some fine background while editing.

    Saturday nights around 6:45 pm (CST), if I remember, it’s off to Hockey Night in Canada for seven minutes of Don Cherry, the 75-year-old former coach and commentator know for his “outspoken manner, flamboyant dress, and staunch patriotism.”

    Cherry also lended his trademark staccato yelling to the Quiznos sandwich chain in Canadian ads, and the “Toasted tastes better” tagline.

    So I thought of Don today, as I pined for hockey and read that Quiznos has adopted a new animal-welfare policy regarding its purchases of eggs, pork and turkey, developed in conjunction with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

    That’s sweet. I wonder if Quiznos modified its buying patterns after tomatoes on its sandwiches in Rochester, Minnesota, sickened at least 10 people with Salmonella in 2007. Maybe Quiznos modified its policies on raw sewage on the floor in its restaurants after a Chicago outlet was closed in 2008. And maybe Quiznos has instituted sensitivity training for its managers after a Toronto spokesthingy said in response to the Canadian listeria outbreak in deli meats which killed 20 last year that, “People are hypochondriacs.”

    This video is aptly titled, Don Cherry is crazy.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 11th, 2009 - 5:01pm by Casey Jacob

    After e-mails released in today’s U.S. Congressional oversight and investigation subcommittee hearing revealed the sentiments of Peanut Corp. of America's president, Stewart Parnell, toward the company's microbial testing, the Associated Press reported,

    Parnell sat stiffly, his hands folded in his lap at the witness table, as Rep. Greg Walden, R-Ore., held up a clear jar of his company's products wrapped in crime scene tape and asked him if he would be willing to eat the food.

    "Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, on advice of my counsel, I respectively decline to answer your questions based on the protections afforded me under the U.S. Constitution," Parnell said.

    After repeating the statement several times, he was dismissed from the hearing.

    Sammy Lightsey, his plant manager also invoked his right not to testify when he appeared alongside Parnell before the subcommittee.

    As the hearing opened this morning, the Atlanta-Journal-Constitution reported,

    Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Marietta, admonished company executives sitting in the crowd, saying they could invoke their Fifth Amendment rights not to testify, but that doesn’t protect them from justice if they’re found guilty of wrongdoing.

    Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, was quoted as saying, “This company cared more about its financial bottom line than it did about the safety of its customers.”

    According to the AP, the president of one company that tested products for Peanut Corp. spoke to the House panel.

    Charles Deibel, president of Deibel Laboratories Inc., said his company was among those that tested Peanut Corp. of America's products and notified the Georgia plant that salmonella was found in some of its peanut stock.

    "It is not unusual for Deibel Labs or other food testing laboratories to find that samples clients submit do test positive for salmonella and other pathogens, nor is it unusual that clients request that samples be retested," Deibel said. "What is virtually unheard of is for an entity to disregard those results and place potentially contaminated products into the stream of commerce."
    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 11th, 2009 - 11:52am by Doug Powell

    India's Hindu nationalist movement is preparing to market a new soft drink made from cow urine.

    Om Prakash, the head of the Cow Protection Department of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), India's biggest and oldest Hindu nationalist group, said the drink – called "gau jal", or "cow water" – in Sanskrit was undergoing laboratory tests and would be launched "very soon, maybe by the end of this year".

    "Don't worry, it won't smell like urine and will be tasty too."

    In 2001, the RSS and its offshoots began promoting cow urine as a cure for ailments ranging from liver disease to obesity and even cancer.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 11th, 2009 - 11:44am by Casey Jacob

    While Peanut Corp., the state of Georgia, and the federal government come under fire for letting salmonella get into roasted peanuts and those peanuts get into hundreds of products, a debate is stirring on the value of revealing the results of microbial testing.

    Doug and Ben want manufacturers to show their results to the public, but Georgia's Senate Agriculture Committee just wants them to tell the state.

    The Associated Press reported two days ago that the Senate Agriculture Committee was discussing a bill that would "require food makers to alert state inspectors within a day if internal tests show a contaminant in a plant."

    According to a New York Times article that day,

    Dr. Steven M. Solomon, an official in [FDA's] Office of Regulatory Affairs, said the agency has viewed such disclosures as a “double-edged sword” that might inhibit some companies from testing in the first place.

    An AP report yesterday said the committee's chairman, Sen. John Bulloch, "delayed a vote on the measure until later this week as he waits for more industry response."

    Meanwhile, Georgia Agriculture Commissioner Tommy Irvin urged Congress to adopt similar requirements. He told members of a House food safety panel,

    "We could have a strong law in Georgia, but if it's not followed by Congress, we could find ourselves in a position of driving out business."

    History shows that companies caught without a culture of food safety don't stay in business, anyway. Smart companies know food safety is good business and should be happy to brag about it.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 11th, 2009 - 10:55am by Doug Powell

    It’s as bad as it gets.

    Early reporting from today’s U.S. Congressional oversight and investigation subcommittee hearing where Peanut Corp. of America President Stewart Parnell was forced to appear and is expected to take the Fifth Amendment and not testify, depicts a company focused on profits rather than food safety.

    E-mails between Parnell and Sammy Lightsey, manager of the company’s Blakely plant, were released as part of a congressional hearing that started at 10 a.m. Wednesday.

    • In one e-mail, Lightsey wrote Parnell discussing positive salmonella tests on its products, but Parnell gave instructions to nonetheless “turn them loose” after getting a negative test result from another testing company.

    • In another e-mail, Parnell expressed his concerns over the losing “$$$$$$” due to delays in shipment and costs of testing.

    • Parnell in another company-wide e-mail told employees there was no salmonella in its plants, instead accusing the news media of “looking for a news story where there currently isn’t one.”

    On Jan. 19, Parnell sent an e-mail to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, pleading with the agency to let it stay in business.

    He wrote that company executives “desperately at least need to turn the raw peanuts on our floor into money.”

    Other revelations underpinning the Salmonella outbreak:

    • The Georgia Department of Agriculture conducted two inspections of the company’s Blakely, Ga. plant in 2008, but did not test for salmonella on its own on either occasion — despite an internal agency goal to conduct such tests once a year.

    • The company’s largest customers, including Kellogg’s, engaged contractors to conduct audits, but they did not conduct their own salmonella tests.

    *The FDA did not test for salmonella at the plant, despite the 2007 salmonella outbreak traced to the Con-Agra plant about 70 miles from Peanut Corp. of America’s Blakely plant.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 10th, 2009 - 1:58pm by Doug Powell

    "It is clear that Peanut Corp. of America is not a producer that companies could — or can — rely on for a safe product.”

    That’s what Seattle lawyer Bill Marler said after private lab tests show there may have been salmonella at a second plant operated by PCA in Plainview, Texas.

    The Texas Department of Health said in a statement the plant temporarily closed Monday night at the request of health officials after the tests found "the possible presence of salmonella" in some of its products.

    The Texas closing comes a day after the FBI raided the company's plant in Georgia, hauling off boxes and other material. Agents executed search warrants at both the plant and at Peanut Corp.'s headquarters in Lynchburg, Va., according to a senior congressional aide with knowledge of the raids.

    Also today, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control upped the sick form Salmonella numbers to 600 in 44 states, along with at least eight deaths.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 10th, 2009 - 10:23am by Katie Filion

    Some jurisdictions, like the Region of Waterloo in Canada, have websites to disclose restaurant inspection reports to the public. Others, a ‘scores on doors’ approach, like the proposed grade postings in NYC.

    Restaurant disclosure systems are designed to communicate restaurant inspection information to the public, and to be most effective these methods have to be eye-catching and informative. The Waterloo website alone isn’t attracting as much public attention as it used to, and is looking to change this, reports The Record.

    The website which once recorded more than a million visits in its first year, is now receiving only 300,000 visits a year, but the region proposes to change this,
     
    The health unit is considering trying to increase the site's popularity by having restaurants voluntarily post signs promoting it.

    The wording hasn't been determined, but the signs might provide a two-year history of an establishment's violations under the provincial Health Protection and Promotion Act. Or the signs might just refer restaurant visitors to the website for the safety history of all local establishments.


    The health unit should consider the first, posting restaurant inspection results on the premises of food establishments – it seems to have kept website numbers in neighboring jurisdictions Toronto and Niagara regular. These jurisdictions combine postings in the form of pass/conditional pass/ fail at the establishment on coloured cards, with the municipality website. And the combination seems to work.

    Though there is often some negative feedback associated with these disclosure cards on the premises, a “Conditional pass” sign in the window of an establishment, like that pictured right, would likely spark consumers to check the website for farther details of the inspection. A sign in the window saying “Visit the Region of Waterloo website for farther inspection details” may not be as effective.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 10th, 2009 - 10:06am by Ben Chapman

    Sometimes I fancy myself a bit of a headlines writer -- so much fun to take pop culture and puns and adjust it to the content.  An op-ed of mine was published in the Raleigh News & Observer today and the headline was great: Companies must come clean on food safety. I didn't write it.

    Here's the op-ed:

     

    RALEIGH -- Since last September more than 520 cases of salmonella typhimurium have been linked to products from Peanut Corporation of America. PCA's peanut butter and paste products are used by many food companies and in many products, including Kellogg's, NutriSystem and Luna bars.
    It's unknown how salmonella made its way into the peanut butter, but it's a hardy pathogen, and in addition to peanut butter it's been associated with almonds, sesame seeds, tahini and chocolate.
    The high-fat content of these foods protects salmonella from the environment and in the gut, so only a small dose is needed to make someone sick. If salmonella is in a product such as peanut butter, there's little that a consumer can do other than to cook the food (envision fried peanut butter crackers).
    More than 800 products have been recalled to date, highlighting the interconnectedness of our food system and showing how one company's problem can quickly impact the entire industry (The always prepared Girl Scouts quickly announced that none of their cookies are made with PCA products).
    There's now a climate of uncertainty over what to buy, eat and discard -- is all peanut butter unsafe? What about whole peanuts? Some consumers will be vigilant and check the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's searchable database (www.fda.gov/oc/opacom/hottopics/salmonellatyph.html). Others will just stay away from peanut products altogether.
    Naturally, there has been a push for greater oversight of the food industry, with more inspectors and inspections. President Barack Obama has used the salmonella outbreak to announce a review of the FDA's functions.
    Inspection is part of the answer, but it's not as though inspectors have magical salmonella-detecting glasses.
    Inspectors can help point out where there might be food safety system breakdowns, but what's more important is what happens when the inspectors aren't around.
    Can a company identify and address risks associated with its products? Can company officials create an environment in which everyone values food safety and shares the same goals?
    A crackdown on the food industry, and the resulting fear of getting caught, might work to change practices in the short term. A better long-term goal is to focus on creating a society that values food safety and compels folks to ask more questions where they buy food, whether at the supermarket, in restaurants or at farmers' markets.
    A segment of consumers (especially peanut-butter-product eaters right now) is already looking for more information about food safety. Asking questions creates pressure on the industry to demonstrate a safety culture, where everyone within an organization has shared values about how not to make customers sick.
    It's time for the really good companies to step up, open their doors and show everyone how they make sure that outbreaks don't happen to them. Not their inspection or audit results, but a compelling story of how they identify and control risks.
    Recapturing lost trust in a chaotic post-outbreak atmosphere could be the biggest return on all our food safety dollars, especially if companies can back it up and start marketing their food safety efforts.
    Ben Chapman is a food safety extension specialist at N.C. State University.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Food Safety Culture  |  0 Comments
    None
  • Posted: February 10th, 2009 - 7:28am by Doug Powell

    Jon Stewart was poking fun at critics of President Obama’s stimulus package on The Daily Show last night, and came up with this quip:

    Funding for regulatory agencies? Please. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have a peanut butter, spinach, tomato and Chinese toy sandwich to finish.

    The line comes about 3:23 into this video.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 10th, 2009 - 6:44am by Doug Powell

    “With eight dead and almost 600 sick, it’s a time to be prudent.”

    That’s what I told CNN Radio late last night in response to a question about the adverts placed by Conagra Foods Incorporated and J.M. Smucker Company in an attempt to bolster peanut butter sales, which have plunged at least 25 percent since the salmonella outbreak. Oh, and with baby Sorenne around (right, exactly as shown), anything after 9:30 p.m. is late.

    “None of these companies are really coming out and saying this is what we do to ensure safety. They say, yeah, we test for salmonella. But are those tests public? They’re not. …

    “If you’re a parent packing a lunch and you have all the hectic things going on in the morning, is it really realistic to say, hey, before you put that peanut snack cracker individually wrapped item into your kid’s lunch you’re going to go onto the Internet and check a Web site? I think that’s a bit much. I think it’s prudent to avoid this stuff until we see where this is going.”

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 9th, 2009 - 5:35pm by Casey Jacob

    Last week, an E.coli outbreak involving at least 17 kids and 3 adults was linked to a Denver cattle show.

    In light of that, a reporter for the San Antonio Express-News spent a day at the petting zoo at the San Antonio Stock Show & Rodeo asking parents if they were worried about the "germs" their kids were being exposed to.

    Some said yes; many others were confident in the precautions they were taking.

    The stepfather of a three-year-old wasn't worried. "We wash his hands," he said.

    One mother said of her thumb-sucking two-year-old,

    “I can’t keep her in a bubble. [But] it’s definitely something I think about every day with her.”

    One of the largest petting zoo outbreaks of E.coli O157:H7 to date was linked to the North Carolina State Fair in 2004. A study of the outbreak by Goode and colleagues found,

    Persons became infected after contact with manure and engaging in hand-to-mouth behaviors in a petting zoo having substantial E coli O157:H7 contamination.

    Use of alcohol-based hand-sanitizing gels was not protective [against infection with E.coli O157:H7], although knowledge of the risk for zoonotic infection was protective.

    Are petting zoos safe for kids? Maybe, if you're aware of the risks and make sure they don't eat any poop. But that might be easier said than done.

    In the San Antonio article, Bill Marler was quoted as saying the threat of exposure to new and dangerous pathogens was too high for him to risk taking a small child or anyone with a compromised immune system to a petting zoo.

    It's your call.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 9th, 2009 - 4:49pm by Casey Jacob

    The Birmingham Mail in England reported a couple weeks ago that half a dozen expired mice dropped to the floor next to diners at the food hall in a local Selfridges department store.

    The rodents were victims of pest contol measures carried out after mice droppings were spotted in a back-of-house area during regular checks.

    caterersearch, who reported the story today, says the mice fell out of the ventilation system.

    The surprised diners were refunded and the company apologized in a statement for any distress caused by the fallen mice.

    Pest control personnel were called out to clear away the remaining mice.

    Additionally, a spokesman explained,

    “Environmental health officers were called in to make sure the matter was dealt with and doesn’t happen again.

    “At their recommendation we have now identified areas the mice may have been coming in and had those blocked off.”

    The spokesman added there had been no more incidents and the food hall was open as usual as soon as these steps were taken.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 9th, 2009 - 4:41pm by Ben Chapman

    The ABC11 report might have been a bit of speculation, Durham County Health Department says that while the outbreak is unknown, it looks like it might be norovirus.

    The outbreak is still under investigation and it appears that lots of misinformation is flying around.

    Here's last week's food safety infosheet on norovirus.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Norovirus  |  0 Comments
    Durham, Emerald Pond
  • Posted: February 9th, 2009 - 2:41pm by Ben Chapman

    Raleigh ABC 11 reports the possibility of a pathogenic E. coli outbreak at the  Emerald Pond retirement home in Durham, NC. It's early on, when information sometimes get's messed up, but the report says:

    A spokesperson from the Durham County Health Department told Eyewitness News the department learned of at least four patients and staff members at Emerald Pond who have the bacterial illness.
    Some strands (sic) of the bacteria can cause diarrhea, while others cause urinary tract infections, respiratory illness, pneumonia and other illnesses.
    The initial report of E. coli cases was made over the weekend, but the Health Department is just beginning its investigation.
    Emerald Pond has closed its dining room as a precaution.
    The retirement home said it's cleaning the facility and "precautions are in place."

    If the outbreak does happen to be pathogenic E. coli it could get messy for elderly individuals, and is often misdiagnosed.  In a 2006 article published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Reiss and colleagues write:

    A growing pool of epidemiological surveys reveals that geriatric populations are at risk of severe manifestations of EHEC O157:H7 infections. A 5-year review of cases in Alberta, Canada, and in Scotland found that morbidity rates, defined as need for hospitalization, in those aged 60 and older were similar to or worse than those in young children. Of 703 patients requiring inpatient medical treatment in Alberta, Canada, during the study period, rates of hospitalization in persons aged 60 and older were nearly twice as high (68.9% of reported cases) as those of children younger than age 5.

    Given the absence of fever, and often only the complaint of ‘‘bleeding per rectum,’’ it is not surprising that cases will be initially misdiagnosed as hemorrhoids, diverticulosis, or another source of painless lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

    A review of nursing home outbreaks and epidemiological data indicate that nursing home patients are indeed at high risk for EHEC O157:H7 infection and related complications, although common perception may still place EHEC and associated HUS/TTP in the category of a pediatric infectious disease.

    The mention of infected staff member(s) puts an interesting twist on things -- raising the possibility that an infected food handler is involved.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    E. coli  |  0 Comments
    Durham, Emerald, Outbreak, Pond
  • Posted: February 9th, 2009 - 10:55am by Doug Powell

    The news this morning is full of features and editorials seeking to explain the shit storm of Salmonella produced by Peanut Corporation of America.

    Chapman and I tried to take it a step further and focus on effective, long-term steps to reduce the incidence of foodborne illness from farm-to-fork. At this point in time, promoting food safety culture coupled with marketing and a series of carrots and sticks is the best we can come up with.

    In 1204 in Montpellier, France, a butcher selling a substitute meat in place of the advertized beast was required by statute to reimburse the customer twice the amount paid. In Narbonne, regulations dictated a whipping “with sheep tripe” in front of the food stall for unscrupulous sellers. China routinely executes its biggest food frauds.

    During a hearing before the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee looking into a salmonella outbreak linked to a Georgia peanut processing plant, Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont said Thursday that food producers responsible for widespread, deadly outbreaks of disease should face jail time, not just fines, to get food makers to take food safety seriously.

    Sixteen years after E. coli O157:H7 killed four and sickened hundreds who ate hamburgers at the Jack-in-the-Box chain, the challenge remains: how to get people to take food safety seriously?
    Lots of companies do take food safety seriously and the bulk of American meals are microbiologically safe. But recent food safety failures have been so extravagant, so insidious and so continual that consumers must feel betrayed.

    The politicos in Washington are focused on legislative fixes, maybe creating a single-food inspection agency, maybe increasing inspections, insisting microbiological test results be submitted to government, maybe mandating jail time for the most audacious executives. Such moves may send a signal of hope and change, but will do little to reduce the carnage contaminated food and water wreak on the American public each year – 76 million illnesses and 5,000 deaths.

    Industry – the folks that process peanuts and all those companies that make some of the 1,550 different peanut butter crackers, ice cream, energy bars and dog treats that have been recalled – is equally void of ideas. The system to ensure safe food relies largely on so-called third-party audits of suppliers, a system that glowingly approved Peanut Corporation of America and its leaky roof, filthy floors and rat-infested storage areas.

    Other peanut butter manufacturers like Unilever and ConAgra Foods say they have “stringent food safety and quality control standards.” But neither will say what it is they do better than PCA; neither will say how often the plants test their finished product for foodborne illnesses or other contamination. Maple Leaf Foods in Canada, whose deli meats killed at least 20 Canadians last fall, says it has done 42,000 tests for listeria across 24 packaged meat plants in the past three months, but will not make the results publicly available for scrutiny.

    Even Whole Foods, where consumers pay a hefty premium for basic foodstuffs, said the company carefully checks the paperwork for all the products it sells, but can do no better than the minimal standard of government.  “For the thousands of products we sell, that’s the extent we can go to. The rest of it is up to the F.D.A. and to the manufacturer.”

    Like a fiscal house of cards, the Ponzi scheme of inspection and verification for food safety is collapsing with merely the mention of consumer scrutiny. Sort of like an eighth grade party with chaperones -- just pop and chips. But when the inspector or auditors leaves, the party turns exciting (read all about it on Facebook).

    A cultural shift is required for everyone, from the farm through to the fork, to take food safety seriously. Frank Yiannas, the vice-president of food safety at Wal-Mart has taken an initial stab in his new book, Food Safety Culture: Creating a Behavior-based Food Safety Management System.

    Yiannas says that an organization’s food safety systems need to be an integral part of its culture. At Peanut Corporation of America, former employees are now coming forward to tell of filthy conditions in the Blakely, Georgia, processing plant. A company with a strong food safety culture would have encouraged those employees to speak up while they were employed, not because the manager or auditor or inspector was watching, but because it was the right thing to do.

    The best food producers, processors, retailers and restaurants should go above and beyond minimal government and auditor standards and sell food safety solutions directly to the public. The best organizations will use their own people to demand ingredients from the best suppliers; use a mixture of encouragement and enforcement to foster a food safety culture; and use technology to be transparent -- whether it's live webcams in the facility or real-time test results on the website -- to help restore the shattered trust with the buying public.

    Here’s what consumers can do: at the local market, the stop-n-shop or the supermarket, ask someone, how do I know this food won’t make me barf? While such talk may be socially frowned upon, it’s time to put aside the niceties and bureau-speak and talk directly about safe food.

    The more customers ask, the more food providers will be encouraged to market their food safety efforts.

    Just like in 13th century France.

    Doug Powell is an associate professor of food safety at Kansas State University and the publisher of barfblog.com. Ben Chapman is a food safety extension specialist at North Carolina State University.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 9th, 2009 - 9:35am by Ben Chapman

    Guest barfblogger Don Schaffner sent Doug and I the below picture from one of his favorite blogs,  blame it on the voices. The picture, likely staged, reminded me of something similar I had seen before my food safety geekdom. 

    During my first couple of years of university, I used to go to Retro Wednesdays at the Trasheteria, an-aptly named bar next to Sun-Sun's in downtown Guelph. There wasn't any Journey or Foreigner played -- it was early nineties retro with the Beastie Boys and Rob Base, with some Nine Inch Nails mixed in.  Pretty much the same stuff I still listen too.

    One of those Wednesday nights, I hit the restroom and saw what I think was a lipstick mark, akin to the Rolling Stones logo, on the lip of the toilet. I returned to my table and sent a couple of my friends in to confirm.  I hadn't really thought of it until Don sent the pic, but maybe we need a "Don't kiss toilets" website.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 8th, 2009 - 1:28pm by Doug Powell

    Australia has had a number of outbreaks involving raw eggs in a variety of dishes. Why any aged care facility, even a so-called upscale one like RSL Anzac Village at Narrabeen would serve dishes with raw eggs to a vulnerable population like senior citizens speaks to the stellar food safety training underpinning their upscale care. Maybe they were trained by the same folks who think it’s OK to serve cold cuts to old folks in Canada – 20 died from listeria in Maple Leaf deli meats last fall.

    The source of the outbreak is believed to be a hollandaise sauce that used raw egg, although the NSW Food Authority is still waiting for conclusive test results.

    The suspected food poisoning occurred on Friday, January 23, when the temperature reached nearly 32 degrees at the RSL Anzac Village at Narrabeen. The high-quality village provides 750 independent living units as well as places for 500 people in nursing home or hostel level care.

    A statement from the home's management said, "Village management apologises unreservedly to all people affected by this unfortunate incident and continues to work with the public health unit to trace the source.”

    It said the village served more than 200,000 meals a year and this was the first known episode of gastric upset relating to food services "in living memory".

    The Minister for Primary Industries, Ian Macdonald, issued a warning about the potential health risks from eating food that contained raw or lightly cooked eggs.

    He said the Government was launching an education campaign in view of a consumer survey by the Food Authority that showed people did not understand how to safely cook or store eggs.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 8th, 2009 - 12:33pm by Doug Powell

    Have Americans become so self-absorbed they have to call 911 when food is not to their liking?

    First it was a dude in Jacksonville, FL, who called 911 because he didn’t like the way his Subway sandwich was prepared. He could have just called Jared.

    Last year, someone called 911 because she couldn’t get a cheeseburger.

    On Friday, a man in Boynton Beach, FL, was arrested and charged with abuse of 911 communication after calling to complain that a local Burger King in did not have any lemonade.

    If I was going to call 911 on Burger King it’d be related to that mascot that looks like a creepy Thunderbirds-clone
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 7th, 2009 - 7:20pm by Katie Filion

    A man in San Diego who was upset with his trial smeared human feces in his lawyer’s face, and proceeded to throw the remainder of poop at the jury, reports 10 News.

    Weusi McGowan, 37, was upset because San Diego Superior Court Judge Jeffrey Fraser refused to remove Deputy Alternate Public Defender Jeffrey Martin from the case, prosecutor Christopher Lawson said.

    At the mid-morning break, McGowan produced a plastic baggie filled with fecal matter and spread it on Martin's hair and face, then flung the excrement toward the jury box, hitting the briefcase of juror No. 9 but missing the juror himself.

    The prosecutor said the defendant was compliant after the outburst, and was taken into custody without further incident.


    Hopefully the lawyer and juror No. 9 washed their hands, and didn’t get any poop in their mouths. Don’t eat poop.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 7th, 2009 - 7:01pm by Doug Powell

    Shelly Awl, a clerk at a gas station on Cheshire Bridge Road in Atlanta, told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution yesterday,

    “It’s so confusing. I wish they would communicate better what is safe and what is not.”

    At a gas station in North Fulton, Karan Singh eyed with suspicion a pile of energy bars, cookies and snacks that had been laid at the check-out counter for purchase, telling a customer,

    “I don’t think I should sell these to you. These might not be good.”


    While many stores — particularly major supermarkets — appear to be keeping up with the recalls, smaller stores seem to be less consistent, according to some spot checks by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

    The salmonella outbreak linked to a South Georgia peanut-processing plant has spawned one of the largest product recalls in American history. The list of products that are off-limits has risen to 1,550, with new names coming out daily.

    However, at Publix stores, spokeswoman Brenda Reid said recall alerts from suppliers and the FDA are immediately e-mailed to stores, which then have three hours to respond that they have removed the recalled item from the shelf. If it’s not accomplished, company managers continue to contact the store and will even send a representative there. District managers also check during their visits, she said.

    The recalled item is also logged into the store’s computer, so if a customer finds one, the cashier will be alerted and will not be able to ring it up, Reid said.

    Kroger stores are alerting customers who have a Kroger Plus Card of any recalled purchases through automated phone calls.

    And in a feature tomorrow, the Journal-Constitution reports federal food regulators describe the 2007 Peter Pan peanut butter salmonella outbreak traced to a Georgia plant in 2007 as “a wake-up call.” But that realization did not lead officials to scrutinize at least one other peanut processor: the Peanut Corporation of America in Blakely.

    They didn’t even know the plant made peanut butter.

    The FDA first learned of possible salmonella contamination at ConAgra four years ago — two years before officials traced hundreds of illnesses to Peter Pan.

    In early 2005, an anonymous tipster told the FDA that ConAgra’s internal testing had detected salmonella in a batch of peanut butter the previous October, agency records show. Company executives confirmed the test results to an FDA inspector but refused to turn over lab reports unless the agency requested them in writing. The inspector left the plant, records show, and never again requested the reports.

    Congressional investigators later learned that FDA policy discouraged written document requests. Federal courts, the FDA said, had ruled that if manufacturers turned over material in response to a formal request from the government, those documents could not be used as evidence in a criminal prosecution against them.

    But in the vast majority of cases, investigator David Nelson told a House subcommittee in 2007, the FDA pursues neither documents nor criminal charges. Nelson termed the agency’s actions “nonsensical.”

    The FDA cited no violations following the 2005 inspection in Sylvester, said Stephanie Childs, a spokeswoman for ConAgra, which is based in Omaha, Neb. Long before the inspector arrived, Childs said, the plant had destroyed the contaminated peanut butter.

    This is why when companies claim they test for Salmonella, like in this ad for Jif (upper left, thanks Barb) that ran today, it’s sorta meaningless without some sort of public disclosure or oversight.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 7th, 2009 - 5:59pm by Katie Filion

    Students at Central Catholic High School in Toledo, Ohio may have become infected with Hepatitis A after a cafeteria worker at the school was diagnosed as being infected with the virus, reports the Toledo Blade.

    The Toledo-Lucas County Health Department encourages students who ate food prepared in the school's cafeteria between Jan. 6 and Jan. 30, and who have not already been vaccinated, to see a doctor and get the immunization.

    The risk of acquiring Hepatitis A is greatly reduced for students who already have been vaccinated with the vaccine, completed the series, or previously had Hepatitis A. The vaccination should be given on or before next Friday to be most effective.


    Hepatitis A is found in feces of the infected person and can be spread by direct contact with food, beverages or crockery. An infected food handler may not know they are ill, as symptoms often do not present until 2 to 6 weeks after infection. Proper hand washing reduces the spread of illness. Symptoms of illness include nausea, yellow skin, fatigue, loss of appetite, and abdominal pain.

    Hepatitis A outbreaks are common among food establishments. There’s even a section of barfblog devoted to them. 
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Hepatitis A  |  0 Comments
    High School Poop
  • Posted: February 6th, 2009 - 10:22pm by Ben Chapman

    I love living in North Carolina. The weather is awesome (it's going to be 70 on Sunday), the BBQ is awesome and, today, we have the best Hooters kitchen crew in the U.S.

    Hooters Corporate put out a press release congratulating the Concord, NC franchise on having the 2008 Kitchen Crew of the year.  The press release says that the selection criterion was based on more than their ability to shake chicken wings. The crew was also evaluated on food safety awareness, performance and productivity.

    Cool, positive consequences for food safety awareness. Although awareness doesn't always translate into practice, it's a start. It demonstrates to the staff in the organization that food safety is something they should all value (and a prize is a nice incentive).

    The prize?  Some cash, a title belt and ....... custom belt buckles.  Awesome. 

    The kitchen crew was presented with $10,000 cash, (to divide among the kitchen staff by tenure) as well as custom belt buckles and a HKCY title belt which will hang in the restaurant until next year's winner is announced. The crew will also receive a feature in Hooters Magazine. In total the Concord Hooters kitchen crew received $20,000 in cash and prizes between the annual and quarterly winnings.

    "We have an amazing kitchen crew in Concord," said Skip Pray, Regional Manager for Hooters of America, Inc. "It is nice to see them share the limelight with the Hooters Girls and be recognized and rewarded for their hard work."


    I've been to Hooters a few times. I've never really liked the food, but I guess that's not the point.  While I explore the state, I'm going to make sure I stop in Concord, NC and snap a pic of the title belt (and a pic of their inspection score).
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 6th, 2009 - 9:28pm by Doug Powell

    A story in Saturday’s  N.Y. Times will report that sales of all brands of peanut butter are down by nearly 25 percent – and those numbers will get worse.

    The contaminated peanut butter traced to the Georgia plant represents a small percentage of the total $800 million in annual sales by the peanut butter companies in the United States. But the public relations problem for the rest of the industry is unlikely to ease anytime soon. …


    So far, the salmonella outbreak has been linked to 575 illnesses and eight deaths, and more than 1,500 products have been recalled, including cookies, ice cream and pet food.

    In response, brands like Jif and Peter Pan are taking out ads to tell shoppers that their products are not affected, and giving them a coupon.

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    Oh, I’m sorry, I fell asleep.

    Instead of telling consumers what they aren’t, maybe the big peanut butter types could tell people what they are – the food safety steps they take to produce a product that won’t make people barf.

    The best food producers, processors, retailers and restaurants should go above and beyond minimal government and auditor standards and sell food safety solutions directly to the public. The best organizations will use their own people to demand ingredients from the best suppliers; use a mixture of encouragement and enforcement to foster a food safety culture; and use technology to be transparent -- whether it's live webcams in the facility or real-time test results on the website -- to help restore the shattered trust with the buying public.

    The makers of Jif and Peter Pan have already gone on record saying they will not disclose their own food safety test results.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 6th, 2009 - 7:36pm by Doug Powell

    In apparent good news for the rest of the American food industry, the folks at Peanut Company of America appear to be douchebags acting on their own after Food and Drug Administration types on Friday said the Blakely, Ga., plant actually shipped Salmonella-positive products without even shopping for a second negative result.

    The company has denied any wrongdoing in the salmonella outbreak linked to at least eight deaths and 575 illnesses in 43 states. The Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation. More than 1,550 products have been recalled.

    Also on Friday, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the recall of salmonella-tainted peanut products shows the need to modernize the U.S. food safety system and ultimately create a single inspection agency.

    “We need a single agency that’s working in a modern framework. We don’t have that today.”


    The push for a single food agency is a political distraction: the only actions that matter are the ones that will reduce the number of sick people.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 6th, 2009 - 12:29pm by Casey Jacob

    I got an e-mail from my best friend this morning. She’s feeling a bit under the weather… again.

    While she’s training to be a speech pathologist, Molly spent a few months in an elementary school and is now at a local hospital.

    According to University of Arizona microbiologist Dr. Charles Gerba -- aka "Dr. Germ" – professionals who serve sick people have an average of 2,620 bacteria per square inch of their workspace, and the average for those who work with kids is almost seven times that.

    An MSN Careers article reporting research conducted by Dr. Gerba and his team suggest that Molly, her former school clients, and her current hospital clients could share “viruses, bacteria and other germs” through light switches, elevator buttons, door handles, and even papers.

    The team’s research was funded by The Clorox Co. and included microbial testing of more than 616 surfaces in private offices and cubicles in Tucson, Ariz., and Washington, D.C. Desktops were thought to harbor more bacteria than any other surface, though phones, computer keyboards, and mice followed closely behind.

    The team then compared the bacterial populations of offices of different professions. They found nine with significantly higher numbers than the others.

    This list included radio DJs who share their space with many different people, and bankers who handle lots of money.

    Lawyers and television producers who meet a lot of people and shake a lot of hands were also listed.

    Accountants and publicists also made the list. These professionals, like me, spend lots of time behind their desks.

    In the article, Gerba mentioned that wiping down your desk, for the most part, simply spreads germs around. He suggests using a disinfectant or sanitizer to clean with. I suggest carefully drying with a paper towel afterward.

    And perhaps taking on a Monk-like approach to human contact and personal hygiene.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Wacky and Weird  |  0 Comments
    None
  • Posted: February 6th, 2009 - 7:26am by Doug Powell

    With at least eight dead, 575 sick and 1,200 products recalled because of Salmonella in peanut thingies, the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee began hearings yesterday to figure out the peanut butter solution.

    Some want jail time for company execs; more inspectors; public oversight of microbial test results; a single food inspection agency; better auditors, and so on.

    Maybe the 1985 movie, The Peanut Butter Solution, had it right. Or late 1960s psychedelic band, The Peanut Butter Conspiracy. Or the B-side to the Jimmy Buffett tearjerker, He Went to Paris, from the 1973 album, A White Sport Coat and a Pink Crustacean, "Peanut Butter Conspiracy."
     

     

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 5th, 2009 - 4:03pm by Doug Powell

    Health officials are investigating an outbreak linked to Colorado's largest stock show after 20 people, including 17 kids, came down with E. coli O157.

    Chris Urbina with Denver Public Health said a lab has confirmed 20 E. coli cases but the number is expected to grow.

    The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment said in a news release,

    "While the investigation is ongoing, we suspect that these infections are linked to attending the National Western Stock Show, which was held in Denver from Jan. 10 to Jan. 25.”


    Although health officials haven't pinpointed the exact cause of the E. coli, the common denominator in all the cases is the stock show, Urbina said.

    Many schools and child care centers organized trips to the stock show, and many children attended with their families, so there is the potential that the number of cases could jump, health officials said.

    On Wednesday, the CDPHE sent a letter to daycare centers alerting them to the outbreak and asking the staff to take special precautions.

    For disease reporting or other questions please contact the CDPHE Communicable Disease program at 303-692-2700.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 5th, 2009 - 4:53am by Doug Powell

    “They called me crazy at Masters and Johnson. But I’ll show them.”
    The demented Dr. Bernardo from Woody Allen’s 1972 film, Everything You Always Wanted To Know About Sex (But Were Afraid to Ask).

    A week ago I asked, with all the recalled products related to Samonella in peanut paste, what problems did the third-party auditors uncover and what was done about such problems?

    A few weeks ago, Chapman and I wrote that,

    Third-party audits are an incomplete form of verification that provide a limited view of a producer’s facilities and documentation but do not effectively reduce risk. …At some point, folks will figure out that all these outbreaks of foodborne illness – like Salmonella in peanut butter – happened at places that passed so-called independent audits.

    Ten years ago, I told the Ontario greenhouse tomato growers they should have their own in-house food safety expertise to help farmers produce safe product and to market the program, with test results, to buyers and consumers.

    They said I was crazy.

    This morning, the N.Y. Times and USA Today are reporting that Peanut Corporation of America, the Blakely, GA firm at the epicenter of the Salmonella shit storm, had “regular visits and inspections” of its Blakely, Ga., plant in 2008, not only by federal and state regulators but by independent auditors and food safety companies that made “customary unannounced inspections.”

    Kellogg's auditor, the American Institute of Baking checked out Peanut Corp. of America's Blakely, Ga., plant in 2007 and 2008 and gave it superior ratings both times.

    "That's frightening," says Michael Doyle, director of the Center for Food Safety at the University of Georgia.

    Andrew Martin of the Times writes that,

    Peanut Corporation of America’s statement was released as food manufacturers and public health officials tried to determine how so many inspectors missed what some have said were obvious problems at the plant, including improper sanitation procedures, live roaches, mold and slimy residue on floors and equipment.

    Kris Charles, a spokeswoman for Kellogg, said,

    Had Kellogg known of the problems at the plant that the Food and Drug Administration detailed recently, “we would have discontinued the relationship with P.C.A. immediately and would not have accepted any ingredients from them.”


    Jim Munyon, president of AIB International, based in Manhattan, Kan., said the company would not have received a superior rating if his auditors had seen the filth the federal government described.

    “It would mean that we didn’t see it on the day we were there. What goes on the rest of the time, we don’t know.”

    He did say that AIB wouldn't see internal test results unless PCA shared them. "They show us only what they want to show us," he says.


    Doug Powell, an associate professor of food safety at Kansas State University, said the salmonella outbreak at Peanut Corporation of America showed the “fallacy” of independent audits, which are commonly used to verify food safety, animal welfare claims and organic production methods. While the intent might be good, he said, the results are usually withheld from the public.

    “Companies say they do all this testing. Great. Show us the data. They won’t. Given all the outbreaks, why should we believe them?”

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 4th, 2009 - 9:31pm by Ben Chapman

    CNN reports that emergency food packages distributed by FEMA in ice-hit Kentucky may contain recalled peanut butter products.

    FEMA's written statement included:

    Commercial meals kits manufactured by Red Cloud Food Services Inc., under the Standing Rock label, have been provided to disaster survivors in impacted communities, and these kits may contain peanut butter which is part of the precautionary national recall underway in accordance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

    People who have received commercial meal kits are asked to inspect the kits in their possession and immediately dispose of any peanut butter packets.

    A written statement might not be the best way to get this info out to the 200,000+ who are still without power in Kentucky.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 4th, 2009 - 4:12pm by Doug Powell

    VfL Wolfsburg's German Under-21 international Ashkan Dejagah is facing a "very long time" on the sidelines after being admitted to a specialist hospital in Hamburg to undergo treatment for hepatitis A.

    Wolfsburg coach Felix Magath said,

    "It is very unfortunate and he will be sidelined for a very long time. We wish him the swiftest of recoveries."

    No word on how the virus was contracted – food, water or otherwise.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 4th, 2009 - 11:29am by Casey Jacob

    At the grocery store yesterday I found jars of Kroger peanut butter stacked nearly waist-high on display at the end of an aisle. Curious, I circled the display, thinking I might find a sign saying “Does not contain Salmonella” or something to that effect. There was no such ad.

    Why aren’t the makers of safe peanut butter bragging about it?

    K-LOVE is always in the background when I do my writing.

    While one of the K-LOVE news anchors was updating listeners on the Peanut Corp. salmonella outbreak, the DJ mentioned he put off buying a jar of peanut butter at the grocery store the night before. He felt it wiser to wait.

    Peanut Corp., the FDA, and several snack manufacturers—including General Mills and Kroger—have warned against eating products made with peanut butter and/or peanut paste produced by Peanut Corp.

    FDA may not be entirely sure what products those are, but has said many times,

    "We don't have concern about the national, name-brand peanut butter that's sold in jars at supermarkets and retail outlets."
     

    Consumers are wary anyway.

    Part of the problem could be the misleading images (such as the graphic above by ABC News) put forth by the media.

    It could just be that recalls are scary.

    After the Maple Leaf listeria outbreak, Canadians cut back on deli meats of all brands and even stopped buying hot dogs. People defensively avoided anything recognized to support the growth of listeria.

    People value safe food.

    If given a compelling story of how companies and industries identify and control risks, they might make different buying decisions.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 4th, 2009 - 10:09am by Ben Chapman

    The Globe and Mail reports today that a rejected shipment of Peanut Corp of America's (PCA) chopped peanuts last spring led to the recall of almost 200 products in Canada and over 800 in the U.S.

    The Globe article says:

    A customer in Canada rejected the peanuts, an act that may have saved lives here, and prompted officials with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to turn their attention to sanitary conditions in the Blakely, Ga., peanut plant at the centre of the outbreak.

    As Fred Willard so succinctly puts it in A Mighty Wind:  "I don't think so".

    It's more likely that the 500+ illnesses and the 8 deaths linked to PCA's peanut butter products (not the customer-rejected peanuts -- in April 2008) led to the recall.

    And overstating how great the system works (which happens all too often, akin to safest food in the world) when lots of other companies in Canada have used the peanut butter products is not all that reassuring.  I know there is a lot of anti-America sentiment around the economic stimulus/protectionism stuff, but a Canadian company rejecting that shipment did not save the day and halt this outbreak (which is still classed as active) or start the recall. Sure the rejected shipment is part of the picture, but no one got really excited before the Salmonella illnesses started showing up. 

    That's right.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 4th, 2009 - 8:42am by Doug Powell

    According to CanWest News, Canadian government officials, based on internal documents, can't agree on how long to scrub.

    Correspondence between senior Ontario and federal bureaucrats obtained under an access to information request reveal disparities in hand washing advice, as discovered by an Ontario health official who surveyed government health websites looking for advice.

    The inconsistencies prompted her to muse, "maybe we should have a National consensus meeting on how to wash your hands."


    No need to file pondersome information requests. A google search reveals all kinds of differing advice  on how best to wash hands. We’ve come up with our own, but are constantly revising as more information becomes available.

    The steps in proper handwashing, as concluded from the preponderance of available evidence, are:

    • wet hands with water;
    • use enough soap to build a good lather;
    • scrub hands vigorously, creating friction and reaching all areas of the fingers and hands for at least 10 seconds to loosen pathogens on the fingers and hands;
    • rinse hands with thorough amounts of water while continuing to rub hands; and,
    • dry hands with paper towel.

    Water temperature is not a critical factor -- water hot enough to kill dangerous bacteria and viruses would scald hands -- so use whatever is comfortable.

    The friction from rubbing hands with paper towels helps remove additional bacteria and viruses.

    Next time you visit a bathroom that is missing soap, water or paper towels, let someone in charge know. And next time you see someone skip out on the suds in the bathroom, look at them and say, “Dude, wash your hands!”


     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Handwashing  |  2 Comments
    Advice, Canada, Poop
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2009 - 11:55pm by Michelle Mazur

    Green bean casserole is one of my favorite dishes.  Lots of people serve it as a side dish, but it always ends up being the main course for me.  It’s a typical staple at our family Thanksgiving dinners, so much so that I decided to bring my own GB casserole to Doug’s Canadian Thanksgiving.  I’ve never had any food safety problems (that I know of) with my casseroles, but unfortunately a woman in Utah had quite a nasty surprise when she went to make her GB casserole.  A dead rat head in the green beans ruined a Super Bowl green bean casserole in Texas.  Even more disturbingly, the company that produced the green beans is a repeat offender.  A can of Allen’s Italian Green Beans was found to contain a rat head back in June, along with another report in 2007 from Utah.

    But don’t worry about the rat head.  It’s “commercially sterile.”  Though high temperatures for cooking (265 degrees) ensure that the product is free from bacteria, the appearance of rat heads in a vegetable product is unsettling for most consumers.  The fact that there have been three reports of rat heads in this particular brand of green beans should cause a big blip to appear in anyone’s food safety radar.

     

    Unless Allen’s Canned Vegetables wants to start listing “dead rat” on it’s ingredient list, a thorough cleaning and inspection of the packing facility is in order.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2009 - 9:11pm by Doug Powell

    As a kid, my pre-game hockey ritual was to buy a Jersey Milk chocolate bar at the arena before going into the dressing room to get ready. I didn’t really know about sugar and caffeine, but it seemed to wake me up before the game. In drastic situations, a Dairy Milk would suffice.

    So I was horrified to read that hockey arenas in Gatineau, Quebec, will no longer be allowed to stock pop, chips, chocolate bars or poutine (actually, I don’t care about the poutine; it’s gross).

    The city of 242,000 has voted to cut junk food from hockey arena food stands within three years in an attempt by to reduce the trans fats in the diet of the Gatineau hockey fan.

    Canteens will replace the snacks with spaghetti, sandwiches, muffins and sports drinks, but not pop.


    Can I get some red wine to go with the spaghetti as I’m strolling into the dressing room? In Quebec, the answer is probably yes.


    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2009 - 4:13pm by Doug Powell

    Eat Me Daily looks like a decent enough food blog that found a chicken producer doing what I told the Ontario greenhouse vegetable growers they should be doing 10 years ago: if not marketing food safety directly, at least provide information for those who care, in the form of a url that the inquisitive type could follow up on at home.

    So we were at the grocery store this weekend, and came across a Murray's Chicken with a sticker on it with a Farm Verification code, offering to let us "find out where this chicken came from and learn more about the family that raised it." … It even hooks into the Google Maps API to show you exactly where the farm is on a map. … Our code, 0289, revealed that our chicken was raised at 1020 Alvira Rd in Allenwood, PA 17810 by David Bowers. Hats off to you Mr. Bowers, that was one tasty chicken.

    I agree with Eat Me Daily. Awesome. And one day, I will be cool.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2009 - 3:45pm by Ben Chapman

    I'm not a fan of focusing on food safety inspections or audits (and neither is Doug).  Sometimes it gets us plunked into the does-not-play-well-with-others category. That's fine.  Here's the deal: After playing hockey with government folks and talking to lots of inspectors I really like them.  I like the idea of what they’re trying to accomplish (and I'll even try to set them up for open-net goals) but the whole concept of inspection as verification of actual food safety practices is flawed.

    The theory behind inspection is that an operator (of a processing company, a restaurant, a church dinner, whatever) has a set of guidelines to follow to make and sell safe food. That part is fine. The inspector/auditor then comes in to tell them whether they are doing things right or not, and record that information. This is where it falls apart. That time the auditor/inspector spends in the facility represents an unrealistic snapshot of what actually happens.  Even if multiple inspectors show up to a facility over a period of time to gather more snapshots, what they see will likely be different. The human factor, around risk identification varies. Some inspectors really know the laws and regulations and risk is black and white. Others see the gray areas.  What's more important to the health and safety of customers is what happens when the inspectors, or auditors, or the boss, aren’t there.

    A couple of years ago, Brae Surgeoner and I interviewed restaurant operators and environmental health officers about their views regarding restaurant inspection. Almost all of the operators suggested that inspection was a good thing, and that they had a good relationship with EHOs.  And that’s when things got fun. Restaurant operators reported to us that what was being seen and recorded wasn't representative of what was really happening with every meal.  They adjusted their personnel and their procedures so they looked good.  It's kind of like an 8th grade house party with chaperones. Just pop and chips. But when the inspector leaves the party turns exciting. The best part of the study for us was that the inspectors reported the same thing: they felt they weren’t getting the full picture and knew everyone was on their best behavior while they were around (just like the parents).

    So what’s to be done? The parents are part of it, but a block parent camped out checking that everyone's breath doesn't smell like peach schnapps isn’t the answer (because folks will find ways around it, like chewing lots of Juicy Fruit gum). The scare tactic of getting caught might work in the short term, but compelling operators to create a food safety culture, that will enhance their business is a better focus.

    In this climate of uncertainty, it’s time for the really good peanut butter companies to step up, open their doors and show everyone how they prevent outbreaks of foodborne illness. Not their inspection or audit results, but a compelling story on how they identify and control risks. This is where the biggest return on all those food safety dollars might be seen, especially if the company can back it up and start marketing it to their customers.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2009 - 1:06pm by Doug Powell

    Daniel Amey, 30, thought he had scratched himself until he noticed his finger was swelling up.

    The Telegraph reported yesterday
    he was rushed to hospital where doctors discovered part of a scorpion's tail in his finger.

    Mr Amey (right, photo from telegraph.uk.com), who works at The Food Company said,

    "I put my hand in the box and thought I had cut it but by the time I was carrying the bananas, my finger had swollen up to twice its size and it felt like it was burning. The doctor was ex-Army and he knew straight away that it was a scorpion as there was a single impact wound from the sting. He told me that if it had been the other kind of scorpion from Africa, I would have been dead within 15 minutes.”


    The greengrocer returned to work the same day but says he will be more cautious when unpacking bananas.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Wacky and Weird  |  0 Comments
    Bananas, Scorpion, Uk, Venom
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2009 - 11:42am by Katie Filion

    NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg announced Saturday a plan for the city to adopt a public disclosure system for restaurant inspection results, reports the New York Times.  The plan, to be put in place over the next two years, will use a letter-grade system similar to that of L.A. County, in which establishments are required to display an A, B, or C in a visible location (such as a window – see right, Jessica Simpson), to compliment information on the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene website. 

    Currently food establishments in NYC are inspected once a year, but the new plan would change this.

    Under the plan, restaurants receiving an A grade would stay on a yearly inspection cycle. Those with B grades would get two inspections, and those with C grades would get three. Those with public-health hazards will be closed until violations are corrected.

    According to Bloomberg,

    This new system will encourage the less sanitary restaurants to clean up -- and won’t punish the good guys. As sanitation improves, so will business. The more residents and tourists can trust the food they buy in New York City restaurants, the more likely they are to patronize them.

    The goal of restaurant inspection is to promote a safe food environment, which in turn may reduce the incidence of foodborne illness in a community. Restaurant disclosure systems are a means of communicating this information to the public, and enhance consumer confidence in food prepared away from home. Though more research needs to focus on the best way to communicate these results to the public, through grades, scores, smiley-faces etc., it does get the public talking about food safety.

     

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2009 - 9:42am by Doug Powell

    A former employee of the Georgia peanut plant at the center of a criminal investigation in a nationwide salmonella outbreak told CBS News he saw a rat dry-roasting in a peanut area.

    Jonathan Prather, one of 50 people who lost their jobs last month when the Peanut Corporation of America shut down its plant in Blakely, told Early Show national correspondent Jeff Glor the facility is dirty.

    "Roaches get up there in the dry roast. Some of them blend in with the peanuts. You'd never know they're there.” … (There were) "plenty of holes in the roof, throughout the roof. And when it rained, water just came through the whole plant."

    Prather says it saddens him that many people have been impacted by the salmonella, adding he's speaking out now because his mother always raised him to tell the truth.

    Former Food and Drug Administration Commissioner David Kessler told The Early Show Tuesday,

    "... The problem is we don't have a system of preventive controls. We're always reacting in this country. It's always chasing the horse after it's out of the barn. …  We have the safest food system in the world, but that doesn't mean it can't be safer. And each of us has responsibilities. Making sure that our food is well-cooked, good hygiene, those things are still important. … (Our food is) certainly safe, but our system is broken. And it needs to be improved, and it needs to be improved quickly."


    Not sure what the basis is for the good doctor’s safest-food-in-the-world bit. Are rats in the roaster part of the equation?

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2009 - 9:01am by Doug Powell

    In 1981 I moved into residence as a freshman at the University of Guelph. Back then the meal plan consisted of paper cards that were worth $20 each. There was a German-themed dining hall/bar in the basement of Johnson Hall, called Der Keller, or what we called it, Derks.

    Those were the waning days of higher education. The student newspaper had just completed its annual homegrown judging contest, and students could purchase beer with their meal cards. There was also a thriving entrepreneurial culture of meal card scalping. Because new cards were issued at the beginning of each semester, the value would decline as the semester wore on. In the last few weeks, $20 meal cards could be had for $12, which could then be transformed into several pitchers of beer.

    And what did those students who traded in meal cards for cash or beer eat? Cereal. Sandwiches. Whatever. For me, the electric frying pan was caloric salvation. I lived on grilled cheese, fried hot dogs, and scrambled eggs. Straight out of the frying pan.

    Today, some hustler has reinvented my memories into the plate-for-one. Geeky Gadgets says,

    Just cook your food directly on the plate and then once it’s done, you can eat it directly on the plate itself. … It’s perfect for those that are single (and like to keep your meals simple), as well as college students. It’d also make it so you could cook directly from your desk, if you so chose.

    A better marketing slogan may be: Plate-for-one, beer for many.


     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2009 - 8:33am by Doug Powell

    Chapman and I have thrown around the idea that one of the reasons Canadians seem complacent about foodborne illness – despite several high-profile devastating outbreaks – is the availability of public health care. If someone loses a kidney because of E. coli O157:H7 or a liver because of hepatitis A, the cost is borne by the system. In the U.S. those without health care coverage would be out $100,000 – at a minimum. So Canadian lawsuits are kept to a minimum, media coverage remains stagnant, and everyone goes back to sleep.

    As Jim Romahn wrote in Dec. after a $27 million settlement for victims in the Maple Leaf listeria outbreak that killed 20 and sickened hundreds was announced, CEO Michael H. McCain is a wily strategist.

    For $27 million, tops, he has bought freedom from a court case that could have proven highly embarrassing to Maple Leaf. The ongoing coverage could well have become the final nail in consumer confidence in Maple Leaf products. The lawyers were sure to ask who knew what and when. They were sure to ask about the degree of plant contamination as the company continued to ship products, failing to first hold them for testing and clearance.

    What does that $27 million buy?

    • Someone who was ill for up to 48 hours would receive $750

    • Up to a week receives $3,000

    •Up to two weeks receives $5,500

    • Up to a month receives $8,000

    • If listeriosis led to a secondary infection that didn't cause ongoing symptoms, such as meningitis or pneumonia, the settlement is $35,000

    • If listeriosis caused sustained or permanent symptoms, the settlement is $75,000 plus $750 for each day of hospitalization

    • If secondary complications affected the nervous system and caused “serious and permanent impairment of physical and/or mental function,” payment is $125,000 plus $750 for each day of hospitalization. A family member who was affected psychologically could receive $10,000.

    • A death would lead to a $120,000 payment to the victim's estate. A spouse would be eligible for an additional $35,000, while children could receive $30,000, parents could receive $20,000 and siblings or grandchildren could receive $5,000. Funeral expenses up to $13,500 would also be covered.

    • Anyone who “sustained psychological injuries or trauma for up to 60 days” after eating tainted meat, without any injuries, could receive up to $4,000.

    • Anyone who was at particular risk, such as pregnant women and the elderly, but did not become ill could receive up to $6,000 for psychological trauma that lasted up to 60 days.

    • If psychological symptoms lasted more than 60 days, compensation is set at $13,500.

    • Those in the vulnerable group who experienced psychological symptoms for more than 60 days could receive $17,500.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 2nd, 2009 - 8:14pm by Doug Powell

    My wife and I enjoyed a wonderful meal last evening at the Mancini household as my mother cooked up some pasta and turkey, absolutely delicious. 

    The turkey, however, reminded me of a past complaint I received at work (health inspections). The family was complaining of a nasty looking abscesses deep within the muscles of the turkey. 

    Though not a bacterial infection, it is certainly not the prettiest thing one would want to have on the dinner plate. The most probable diagnosis is deep pectoral myopathy of turkeys as suggested by my veterinarian friend. 

    These deep pectoral muscles assist in elevating the wings and after prolonged flapping, the muscle swells and becomes necrotic. Ugly to look at, but not a health concern. Still, I wouldn’t have eaten it. A good review on this type of pathology was done by: Siller WG. Deep pectoral myopathy: a penalty of successful selection for muscle growth. Poult Sci. 1985 Aug; 64(8):1591-5. 
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 2nd, 2009 - 12:24pm by Casey Jacob

    Deciphering recall information is tough for the regular consumer.

    Automated phone calls to shoppers have been appreciated. Pictures of products have also helped to clear things up.

    But it seems that retailers need some assistance accessing and utilizing recall information to better aide consumers.

    Recalled products were found on grocery and convenience store shelves after:
    - Salmonella bacteria were discovered in Veggie Booty snacks,
    - botulinum toxin was found in Castleberry’s chili,
    - Topps meat was recalled due to E. coli contamination,
    - Listeria monocytogenes was detected in Maple Leaf deli meats, and
    - dairy products were found to contain melamine.

    Growing up, my brother Skyler had an awesome Batman alarm clock. When it was time to get up, the Bat-Signal would shine on the ceiling and a voice would say, “Gotham City is in trouble; call for Batman!” It was a great call to action.

    I think the citizens need another hero: The Recaller.

    Along with a handful of producers, some grocery retailers have specialized personnel on staff to manage food safety issues.

    Barry Parsons
    fills that role for the three Stauffers supermarkets in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

    When he gets news of a recall, Parsons says,

    "Twenty minutes to a half an hour and it's off the shelf."

    POW. BAM. WHAP. The threat is negated.

    My bother Jesse (currently a third grader) found a hero in Spiderman.

    All the aforementioned recalls have shown that the production and distribution of food today has the power to reach and—positively or adversely—affect many, many people. And you know what Uncle Ben says about great power….

    "There's a lot of responsibility being in the food business," Parsons said. "I really care about this.

    "Because it could be a child. I've had children myself. Imagine if your child got sick. How would you feel as a parent? The elderly — they're susceptible. My parents are in their 80s. That really hits me."


    That’s what I see as a culture of food safety.

    The superhero I favored was a good guy from Kansas: Superman.

    (At right: Dean Cain's costume from 'Lois and Clark' was on display alongside old mining equipment and [representative] boxes of stored film reels at the  Kansas Underground Salt Museum when Bret took me last year.)

    The Pennsylvania Recaller says of his position,

    "You've really got to be dedicated to it, and you've really got to have a sense of caring.

    "You've got to say, 'No matter what's going to happen, I'm going to make sure my customers are safe, my employers are safe.'

    "This is not something I do as a job. It's just what I do. It's who I am."

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 2nd, 2009 - 10:34am by Doug Powell

    As the number of recalled products topped 800, U.S. President Barack Obama said this morning he is ordering a “complete review” of the Food and Drug Administration after it failed to detect shipments of salmonella-contaminated peanut products.

    In an interview taped Sunday and aired this morning on the television gabfest, Today, Obama said the agency’s failure to recognize and intercept the products was only the latest of numerous “instances over the last several years” in which “the FDA has not been able to catch some of these things as quickly as I expect them to catch.”

    “At bare minimum, we should be able to count on our government keeping our kids safe when they eat peanut butter.”


    USA Today today reported that the recall, one of the largest ever, started with bulk peanut butter, spread to crackers and cookies and has engulfed products as diverse as kettle corn, pad Thai and trail mix, with over 800 recalls and many more expected this week.

    Robert Brackett, senior vice president of the Grocery Manufacturers Association, said anecdotal evidence indicates that sales of all peanut-related products, even unaffected peanut butters, are slipping, adding,

    "All it takes is a little company, and it has a huge ripple effect.”

    The GMA says Peanut Corporation of America supplied less than 1% of peanut products sold in the U.S. Still, the FDA says the company has more than 300 customers, many of whom used PCA's products as an ingredient.

    Brackett fears consumers will tire of checking recall lists and begin shunning anything with peanuts. Past food scares have shown that to be true.


    When asked by CBC Radio in Sudbury, Ontario this morning, “what’s a consumer to do,” I said,

    “Avoid the stuff for now. It may not be fair, but the recall list is growing so fast, it’s prudent. And now folks have an idea what people with peanut allergies have to go through.”
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 2nd, 2009 - 8:03am by Doug Powell

    I first heard the term Vegemite near the beginning of the worst decade of music ever, in 1981’s hit, Down Under, by Men at Work.

    He just smiled and gave me a Vegemite sandwich.


    What’s a Vegemite?

    This was the old days – before public access Intertubes and Google and Wikipedia.

    I’ve since learned, and wiki confirms, that Vegemite is made from leftover brewers' yeast extract, a by-product of beer manufacturing, and various vegetable and spice additives. The taste may be described as salty, slightly bitter, and malty - somewhat similar to the taste of beef bouillon. The texture is smooth and sticky, much like peanut butter. It is not as intensely flavoured as British Marmite and it is less sweet than the New Zealand version of Marmite. Fred Walker's company first created and sold Vegemite in 1922.

    The New Zealand Herald reports if the Australian Government has its way, Vegemite could be banished from supermarket shelves because of its high salt content.

    A preventive health task force, set up by Canberra to examine ways of tackling Australia's obesity problem, has canvassed the idea of taxing foods high in fat, sugar and salt. Although its final report is not due until June, the Australian Food and Grocery Council is already warning that Vegemite is under threat.

    The Australian online news website Crikey suggested the Vegemite controversy had been cooked up by the industry body as a pre-emptive strike.


    Below, a fine example of just how bad popular music became in the 1980s. Oh, and did anyone catch the worst band ever, Journey, performing their 1981 – what a terrible year – power ballad, Don’t Stop Believin’ for Super Bowl tourists as part of the pre-game show in what could only be termed a tune-up for their upcoming State Fair extravaganza? And Springsteen sucked. He usually does.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 1st, 2009 - 6:24pm by Mayra Rivarola

    Traceability was a popular topic when I started working for Doug last summer, with the Salmonella-linked-to-tomatoes-or-was-it-peppers outbreak. The current peanut butter-linked outbreak follows the same trends as the list of recalled products is on the rise. As a consumer, I wonder: do producers know their suppliers and where their food is coming from?

    The FDA warned consumers to postpone consumption of anything containing peanut butter or peanut butter paste. This is where labeling becomes important. Not only should consumers read labels, they also need some assurance that labels are accurate.

    A woman suffered a severe allergic reaction after eating a parfait in a Canadian Starbucks last week. She purchased the parfait after an employee assured the dessert was nut-free. The ingredients list also failed to mention nuts. I am pretty sure this woman will have a hard time trusting labels after this.

    I was diagnosed with celiac disease a few weeks ago and I know how this feels. I have to avoid products containing gluten – a protein found in wheat, rye, barley, and triticale.

    Gluten can also be found as a food additive in the form of flavoring, or as stabilizing or thickening agent. In such cases, producers are not required to include the protein on the label because it is classified as GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) by the FDA. There is also no official definition as to what constitutes a gluten-free product, so celiacs like me are recommended to buy products from trusted sources.

    That Canadian Starbucks is not a trusted source.

    Whether it’s because of food allergies, intolerance to gluten, or salmonella, food processors need to be aware of where their products come from and what they contain.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 1st, 2009 - 11:05am by Doug Powell

    WKRP in Cincinnati station manager Arthur Carlson once asked Andy and Jennifer to pose for a fundraising calendar, or something.

    Arthur: This year’s theme? Surf City USA.

    Jennifer: In Cincinnati, Ohio?


    Similarly, I never thought of Chattanooga, Tennessee, as a beacon for raw oysters. But, the local health unit reports that three unassociated groups of people who ate oysters at The Boathouse Rotisserie and Raw Bar (located at 1011 Riverside Dr.) became ill. A total of 19 people reported illness after eating at the restaurant between Monday, Jan. 12, and Sunday, Jan. 18, and developed symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and diarrhea 12-40 hours after eating. The majority of those ill reported eating raw oysters.

    Following standard protocol, the Health Department conducted an investigation to determine the cause of the illness. The establishment fully cooperated with the Health Department’s procedures. Inspection of the restaurant along with interviews with and testing of foodhandlers at The Boathouse Rotisserie and Raw Bar did not implicate those persons or the restaurant as a source of infection.

    Seventy-five percent of those tested were positive for norovirus. Confirmed by the Food and Drug Administration, the illnesses have been linked to raw shell oysters harvested off of the coast of Mississippi. Under advisement of the FDA, the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources is advising consumers not to eat oysters harvested from Conditionally Approved Area 2 “C” Shellfish Growing Waters in Mississippi from Jan. 5-9. These oysters may be contaminated with norovirus. …

    Oysters cultivated in coastal areas close to human activities can be contaminated by human sewage, which can spread different types of viruses, including noroviruses.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 1st, 2009 - 10:34am by Doug Powell

    WKRP in Cincinnati was always one of my favorite television shows. Although not much of a hit when it originally aired from 1978-1982, WKRP was a blockbuster in syndication, and can still be seen on WGN (tonight at 6 pm Central, Bailey lets Johnny move in). Amy got me the complete first season on DVD.

    The episode where station manager Arthur Carlson regrettably takes on the religious right came to mind when reading about the Digestive Table (below, left), created by artist Amy Young who lives in … Ohio.

    This homebrew "bio-factory" includes a dense mixture of live Red Wiggler composting worms, sowbugs, shredded paper, food scraps, and other biodegradeable materials. Included in the table structure is an embedded LCD screen and infrared camera so that people dining at the table can catch a glimpse of the decomposition process happening below. Although this reviewer likes the utilitarian aspect of this table concept, I would be hesitant about eating a meal near any kind of decomposition process.

    One of WKRP’s long-time advertizers is Harvey, who sells, “Red Wigglers, the Cadillac of worms.” Catchy jingle too. Compost away, I do, but outside, not at the dinner table.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share