Syndicate content

Ben Chapman

  • Posted: February 9th, 2012 - 3:13pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Universities have a tough time with norovirus. Close quarters, not-the-best-personal-hygiene and cafeterias are all factors in spreading the pathogen around. Brae Surgeoner, Doug and I had a paper published in the September 2009 Journal of Environmental Health about some research we conducted in the Winter of 2006. The study came about because a whole bunch of kids in the University of Guelph's residence system started puking from an apparent norovirus outbreak. There were lots of handwashing signs up and we wanted to know whether they changed hygiene behavior (especially if kids were using the tools available when entering the cafeteria). Turns out that the kids weren't doing as good of a job at hand hygiene as they reported to us. According to our study, Observed compliance with prescribed hand hygiene recommendations occurred 17.4% of the time. Despite knowledge of hand hygiene protocols and low compliance, 83.0% of students indicated that they practiced correct hand hygiene during the outbreak.

    According to CNN Rider University in New Jersey is dealing with a noro outbreak that has sent students to hospital, which might be connected to repeat offenders Princeton.

    About 40 students at a university in New Jersey have been taken to hospitals for treatment after an outbreak of what authorities believe is the norovirus. The Rider University students, at the school's campus in Lawrenceville, were brought to hospitals late Wednesday night, the school said Thursday. The suspected outbreak comes a week after an outbreak began at nearby Princeton University, which is still under way, officials said.

    "We are coordinating treatment information with that university. We have also informed neighboring institutions," Rider said on its website.
    Some of those taken to hospitals have been discharged and returned to campus.

    Below in a food safety infosheet detailing another Princeton-related outbreak from 2008.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
    Food Safety Culture  |  0 Comments
    None
  • Posted: February 9th, 2012 - 12:13pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    When I was in high school, nerding it up with some other high school kids at the obviously-exciting annual Ontario Model Parliament simulation, I met Hilary Weston. She was the Lieutenant-Governor of Ontario (that's in Canada) and she and Galen, her husband, owned a bunch of huge food businesses including Weston Foods (Canada's largest bakery) and most of food retailer Loblaws.

    When I met her I told her I liked her bread.

    Hilary and Galen's son Galen Jr, who runs Loblaws now, has pissed some people off in the past couple of days with his (now retracted) comments that farmers' markets are going to kill people.

    I want to buy food from someone who is worried about killing people - not someone who says we we've never had a problem. I figure that if they worry about the consequences, they might actually do something about it.

    Over the past couple of years one of my graduate students, Allison Smathers, has been working with farmers' markets in North Carolina to develop and evaluate food safety workshops for market vendors and managers. Market managers, vendors and organizers have been part of the process from the start. But creating and delivering this training doesn't mean that practices are impacted. Recognizing the need to measure behavior change (and the limitations of relying on self-reported tests), Allison has enlisted the help of a group of secret shoppers who have collected data on current practices and facilities and provided insight into specific areas to focus on. Stuff the shoppers saw, like improper handwashing, cross-contaminating samples and not monitoring temperatures have been the big focus.

    Right now Allison and I are in Lincolnton, NC delivering the material to a bunch of extension agents who will be training market folks soon.  The secret shoppers will be back out this summer looking again for food safety practices at markets where vendors and managers have been trained - something Allison can compare to what was seen in previous summers. 2010 data was presented at the 2011 IFT annual meeting (abstract below, poster here).

    At the end of the project we'll be able to either show some changes - or not - regardless we'll know how well the training worked and what to work on in the next iteration. 

    Seems like a much better approach than "trust us."

    Smathers, A., Chapman, B and Phister, T.

    Evaluation of facilities and food safety practices in the North Carolina farmers market sector.

    IFT Annual Meeting (June 12, 2011)

    The association between produce and ready-to-eat foods with foodborne illness prompts concern in the North Carolina farmers’ market sector. Since large amounts of produce are sold at farmers’ markets, there is an increased need to protect the farmers’ market sector from foodborne illness.  Considering this potential, we designed a method of assessment to measure the food safety culture and awareness of farmers’ market vendors.  The objective of this study was to observe the practices carried out at a farmers’ market in order to assess the need for food safety training and information directed specifically toward the promotion of good food safety practices at farmers’ markets. The study used 20 secret shoppers, trained to observe and collect quantitative and qualitative data through observational surveys.  During the 2010 market season, secret shoppers provided information that was neither incriminating nor praiseworthy from 37 farmers’ markets and 168 farmers’ market vendors, representing a large sample of North Carolina markets.  The information was provided through observational surveys and results were estimated through analysis of survey data.  The survey data was used to create trends and relationships to assess the food safety knowledge and practices carried out at a farmers’ market.  Our findings highlight the need for food safety improvement in areas such as cross-contamination, hygiene, sanitation, sampling, claims, and storage.  Results provide a need for enhancement of food safety at the farmers’ markets in order to protect the farmers’ market sector from being linked to foodborne illness outbreaks. The overall goal of supporting the growth and health of the North Carolina farmers’ markets will continue to be supported through further assessment and education development.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 9th, 2012 - 8:52am by Ben Chapman

    food.safety.culture.jpg
    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Most of the stuff I've worked on in the past ten years has something to do with evaluating and supporting food safety culture. bites, barfblog, infosheets and reality-based research are all about providing information to make risk-based decisions and assessing where there might be gaps.
    The ultimate goal is less sick people.

    But as one of my mentors Gord Surgeoner once told me, businesses wont pay attention to food safety unless it generates revenue or some how keeps them from losing money. Making people sick is bad business. So is spending money on training programs or handwashing signs if there isn't a measurable return on investment.

    I've been to lots of talks where smart food safety folks were supposed to present about their food safety culture, but really have only shared their training program requirements. And while maybe they are measuring it, no one talks about their return on investment.

    In a paper published in 2011,  Doug, Casey Jacob and I wrote:

    Maintaining a food safety culture means that operators and staff know the risks associated with the products or meals they produce, know why managing the risks is important, and effectively manage those risks in a demonstrable way. In an organization with a good food safety culture, individuals are expected to enact practices that represent the shared value system and point out where others may fail.
    Training is part of it. So is having some sort of verification that staff and supervisors are actually reducing risks. It's pretty easy to point to a poor food safety culture - it's more difficult to define a good one. But one of the indicators is the "dude wash your hands factor" - pointing out where others fail and modeling the right practice.

    Conagra, one of the biggest food companies in North America, and source of a few foodborne illness outbreaks in the past few years, is trying to step up their internal assessment of food safety culture, and sharing it publicly.

    In the January 2012 issue of Food Technology, the ConAgra food safety crew shared their approach to assessing their food safety culture (at least the self reported values part) and how they used the results to change the way they train and support good practices in their plants.

    Administering a survey to all plant personnel—line workers as well as supervisors and management—is the first step in the assessment process. Having all employees take part in the survey is important, as it sets the stage for communicating that everyone contributes to the plant’s food safety culture and that food safety is everyone’s responsibility. The act itself of taking the survey increases awareness of the concept of food safety culture, gets people talking about food safety culture, and ultimately drives toward improvements.

    Their main findings support the approach we use with much of our work - tell people about consequences (both positive and negative),  help staff learn from past mistakes and appreciate a community with shared values:

    1. Employee desire
    • Both employees and leaders want food safety held up as an equal to personal safety, with both groups talking about the need to inspire employees around food safety.
    • Participants said they specifically wanted to know more about lessons learned from food safety issues and incidents and how they would prevent future problems.
    2. Teamwork
    • Employees want to be able to rely on one another.
    • Employees felt that there needs to be a good balance of supervisor responsibility and their own responsibility, but felt that at the end of the day, they are personally accountable.
    3. Recognition
    • Employees were proud of the plant’s food safety performance and understood that it deserved recognition. Recognition breeds motivation.
    • Suggestions were made to reinstitute food safety and recognition committees to help drive engagement from the floor.

    Great stuff, especially the recognition that surveys and focus groups are just the start (people tend to lie), I hope Conagra continues on this path, publishes this stuff in a peer-reviewed journal, shares some of their further assessments and market it to their customers
    It would also be nice for others to know what ConAgra's return on investment for food safety culture is.


     

    Your rating: None (7 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 8th, 2012 - 12:09am by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Like many folks, Dani and I used to get together with a bunch of friends each year to watch the Super Bowl. And the event rarely lived up to the hype. While it was fun to hang out and exchange snarky comments about the half-time show, I never really ended up watching the game. Now I prefer to stay home, quietly watch (which I remind Dani is the last football game for 6+ months) in my recliner and make snarky comments about the halftime show online.

    On the menu at our house this year was baby back ribs, baked potatoes and jalapeno poppers. Unhealthy eating and the Super Bowl go hand-in-hand.

    In an attempt to exploit every possible Super Bowl storyline, ESPN rehashed one of their favorite investigative journalism methods and ran a profile on food safety at Indianapolis host site Lucas Oil Stadium.

    Outside the Lines'" The File recently acquired 2011 Marion County health department inspection records for the 181 food and beverage outlets inspected at Lucas Oil Stadium and found that 25, or 14 percent, of the locations had critical violations that showed up during routine inspections. A 2010 "Outside the Lines" piece that examined food safety at all professional sports stadiums showed that about 7 percent of the vendors at Lucas Oil Stadium had racked up critical violations -- problems that could lead to illness.
    Among the violations found in the stadium were expired tomatoes and onions, a chef who didn't wash his hands, a microwave covered in gunk, gnats in an onion bin and hamburger patties toiling in a steamer at lukewarm temperatures -- a situation ripe for bacteria.
    Expired tomatoes and onions? What does that mean?

    Handwashing problems and not-so-hot-holding of cooked burgers are problems. Both actions have led to illnesses recently.
    In a predictable turn, coverage went from the risky to yuck factor:
    Lucas Oil Stadium first came under scrutiny over food practices in 2009, when a local TV station reported 42 critical food safety violations, including several that cited examples of dead mice or mice droppings near food and meal-preparation surfaces -- even in an oven -- and live mice running through a loge-level kitchen. The head of the county's food safety program at the time said there was a "widespread rodent problem."

    Not to be left out of the discussion, International Business Times also ran a story about food safety - this one about an illness that MVP Eli Manning's had a couple of weeks ago. Although reported at the flu, a New York State MD, Dr. Gerald Deas thought that it was more likely that Eli was suffering from an E. coli infection.

    The  quarterback may be getting ready to run his team's offense Sunday in the 2012 Super Bowl, but in the days running up to the Giants' 20-17 win in San Francisco on Jan. 23, he likely had E. Coli, according to Dr. Gerald W. Dean of New York.

    The medical doctor wrote in a Feb. 1 column in Frost Illustrated, a local Indianapolis-area newspaper, that his professional opinion was that  was sick with E. Coli, despite the fact that it was reported that he had the flu.

    "A few days prior to the battle of the Giants with the San Francisco 49ers, Eli Manning was struck in his gut with a bacteria known as E. coli. It was reported in the press thathe had had a bout with the flu, which I doubted," Dr. Dean wrote Feb. 1 in Frost Illustrated. "It was further reported that he missed practice for the big game due to running back and forth to relieve himself, which could have been diarrhea."
    Dr. Dean goes on to say that as he examined press photographs and videos of Eli Manning in the days leading up to the NFC Championship "it was obvious that he was washed out and looked totally dehydrated, which diarrhea can cause."

    "Personally, I think all superstars, whether they be man or animals should be carefully monitored for drugs, diet and drinking habits before championship games or races," Dr. Dean wrote. "Millions of dollars are being bet on the outcome of a particular event and something like a simple bacteria such as E. coli can change the outcome of a sporting event and its participants."

    Uh, yeah, that's some nice detective work there. Could have been noro as well.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 3rd, 2012 - 9:03am by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Translated by Albert Amgar
     

    Le département de la santé de Caroline du Nord a signalé une éclosion à norovirus ces dernières semaines, permettant aux responsables de la santé de l’État d’émettre une alerte.

    Plus de 125 clients d’un restaurant de Conover, Caroline du Nord, sont tombés malades à cause de norovirus mi-janvier ; la plupart des personnes ont été malades après avoir mangé au restaurant Harbor Inn Seafood, les 13 et 14 janvier, mais quelques clients sont devenus malades très récemment après avoir y mangé le 20 janvier.

    Bien que l’origine de l’aliment n’ait pas été identifiée, des victimes disent que les personnes présentes à la party qui sont tombées malades après avoir mangé chez Harbor Inn Seafood, sont celles qui ont mangé de la salade composée.

    Les salades peuvent être préparées par une personne qui ne se voit pas comme étant un manipulateur d’aliments. Norovirus,

    spécifiquement durant les mois d’hiver, est stable dans l’environnement et peut survivre et infecter pendant des semaines après une contamination.

    Des infections à norovirus peuvent avoir lieu sans symptômes.

    Les personnes infectées par norovirus peuvent libérer d’importantes quantités de particules virales lors de vomissements et de diarrhées.

    L’excrétion virale (présence du virus dans les selles) peut parfois durer pendant 3 semaines après que les symptômes soient terminés.

    Norovirus peut persister sur des surfaces de cuisine pendant plus de six semaines.
    La plupart des désinfectants pour les mains ne sont pas efficaces pour réduire norovirus.

    Download

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
    Food Safety Culture  |  0 Comments
    None
  • Posted: February 1st, 2012 - 7:32pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    The newest food safety infosheet, a graphical one-page food safety-related story directed at food businesses, is now available
    Food Safety Infosheet Highlights:
    - Norovirus outbreaks on the increase North Carolina
    - Infected people can shed large amounts of norovirus in their vomit and diarrhea.
    - Norovirus can persist on common kitchen surfaces for up to 6 weeks.
    - Most hand sanitizers are not effective at reducing norovirus from hands.
    Food safety infosheets are created weekly and are posted in restaurants, retail stores, on farms and used in training throughout the world. If you have any infosheet topic requests, or photos, please contact Ben Chapman at benjamin_chapman@ncsu.edu.
    You can follow food safety infosheets stories and barfblog on twitter @benjaminchapman and @barfblog.

    Click hear to download the sheet.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
    Food Safety Culture  |  0 Comments
    None
  • Posted: January 30th, 2012 - 5:32pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    I'm currently experiencing the warmest winter I've ever had - Raleigh hasn't had a day below freezing (a few nights) and I have yet to scrape my car off in the morning. Yesterday I strapped my kids into a bike trailer and rode around on a few paved trails and tomorrow it's going to be close to 70F. I love the south. But just because it's warm doesn't mean that the state will avoid norovirus - the famed winter vomiting sickness.

    In 1929 Dr. John Zahorsky wrote about a history of gastrointestinal illness events, which would become norovirus. After seeing children develop sporadic cases of vomiting, supplemented by watery diarrhea each year between November and May, through over 30 years of clinical practice, he coined the term winter vomiting sickness.

    Over 125 folks in Conover NC dealt with a norovirus outbreak back in mid January. According to the Raleigh News & Observer, most illnesses were linked to eating at the Harbor Inn Seafood restaurant on January 13 and 14 - but some folks got sick after eating there as recently as January 20th.

    Catawba County Public Health has been working with the N.C. Division of Public Health to figure out what's been making people sick since the first cases were reported Jan. 17.

    Although Public Health has not announced what food or foods caused the illness, victims have stated that the members of their party who got sick after eating at Harbor Inn were the ones who ate tossed salad.


    Neither tossed salad or an exposure period of over a week would be all that surprising - tossed salad can be prepped by someone who doesn't see themselves as a food handler - and noro, especially in cooler months, is pretty stable in the environment (and could stick around to infect for weeks).
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 26th, 2012 - 1:47pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    When I was in my third year of undergrad I signed up to be a Residence Assistant (for the second time). The first time around I was a bit of a stickler for rules and felt like I was supposed to enforce the law. By my second experience, I mellowed and I learned that my job was to make sure that the students in my section didn't kill themselves or each other.

    That second year, some of the more colorful students I lived with had an unhealthy love of hip-hop artist DMX's song  Party Up (Up in Here). I probably heard that song 500 times as I walked through the hall during those 8 months.

    Totally unrelated to the overplaying of that song, according to TMZ, DMX was taken to a Charlotte NC area hospital after coming down with food poisoning after eating shellfish on a flight from Miami.

    According to DMX, he had some "bad shrimp" at his baby mama's house in Miami before he got on a plane -- commercial -- and then spent most of the flight tossing his cookies in the lavatory.

    X tells us ... as soon as he touched down he went to Gastonia Memorial Hospital outside of Charlotte ... by limousine. Puking, but still balling!!

    X spent about four hours in the emergency room getting treated for food poisoning, and then headed home.



     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
    Food Safety Culture  |  0 Comments
    None
  • Posted: January 23rd, 2012 - 11:19am by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    In January 1993 I was in 10th grade. I had just discovered the Violent Femmes and punk rock; was worried about figuring out calculus (I eventually did); and spent most of my time being uncool and longing to be cool. Probably pretty similar to every other awkward teenager. I didn't have a clue that a tragic foodborne illness outbreak was unfolding in the Pacific Northwest and that the event would eventually define a bunch of what I focus on every day.

    I had never even heard of Jack-in-the-Box.

    The outbreak was linked to four deaths, over to 700 illnesses and almost 200 hospitalizations. E. coli O157:H7 contaminated hamburger was then undercooked and served to thousands from 73 Jack-in-the-Box restaurants. Jack-in-the-Box will forever be linked to this event - and over the past 18 years has become a prominent force in food safety risk reduction.

    News of this outbreak hit on President Clinton's inauguration day and as Doug has written,

    Those two events, more than any other, dramatically changed the public discussion of food safety in the U.S. The Jack-in-the-Box outbreak had all the elements of a dramatic story: children were involved; the risk was relatively unknown and unfamiliar; and a sense of outrage developed in response to the inadequacy of the government inspection system. The newly inaugurated President Clinton made microbial food safety a Presidential issue.

    And the first focus went to E. coli O157:H7 - the serogroup linked to the Jack-in-the-Box illnesses. Food microbiologists and epidemiologists have seen lots of other equally dangerous shigatoxin-producing serogroups (shigatoxin is what makes E. coli O157:H7, along with its ability to stick to cells so devastating). Here's a list of the non-O157 STEC outbreaks we've been able to find going back to the mid-1990s.

    Later this afternoon I will be on my way to Lincoln, NE to meet with a group of academics, researchers, extension folks and regulators to talk about a large 5-year integrated project focused on reducing STECs from farm-to-fork that USDA NIFA has funded. Through the wonders of the Internet, Doug will be Skyping in.

    LINCOLN, Neb. -- The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced today that it has awarded a research grant to the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) to help reduce the occurrence and public health risks from Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) along the entire beef production pathway. Dr. Chavonda Jacobs-Young, acting director of USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), is scheduled to award the $25 million grant to the UNL-lead research team today at the university in Lincoln.

    "Shiga toxin-producing E. coli are a serious threat to our food supply and public health, causing more than 265,000 infections each year," said Chavonda Jacobs-Young, acting NIFA director. "As non-O157 STEC bacteria have emerged and evolved, so too must our regulatory policies to protect the public health and ensure the safety of our food supply. This research will help us to understand how these pathogens travel throughout the beef production process and how outbreaks occur, enabling us to find ways to prevent illness and improve the safety of our nation's food supply."

    Dr. James Keen at UNL, along with a multi-institutional and multi-disciplinary team of researchers, educators and extension specialists, will use the $25 million grant to improve risk management and assessment of eight strains of STEC in beef. This work will include the O104 strain that caused the recent outbreak in Germany. The project will focus on identifying hazards and assessing exposures that lead to STEC infections in cattle and on developing strategies to detect, characterize and control these pathogens along the beef chain. This knowledge will then be used to find practical and effective STEC risk mitigation strategies. The five main objectives of the project include:

    Detection: develop and implement rapid detection technologies for pre-harvest, post-harvest and consumer environments.

    Biology: characterize the biological and epidemiological factors that drive outbreaks of STEC in pre-harvest, post-harvest, retail and consumer settings.

    Interventions: develop effective and economical interventions to lessen STEC risk from cattle, hides, carcasses, and ground and non-intact beef and compare the feasibility of implementing these interventions for large, small and very small beef producers.

    Risk analysis and assessment: develop a risk assessment model for STEC from live cattle to consumption to evaluate mitigation strategies and their expected public health impacts.

    Risk management and communication: translate research findings into user-friendly food-safety deliverables for stakeholders, food safety professionals, regulators, educators and consumers.

    For more check out the full PR here.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 20th, 2012 - 1:40pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    About once a month we take our kids to Chick-Fil-A and let them run wild in the play area. It's a treat that keeps Jack behaving relatively well for a few hours beforehand - and Dani and I like the food there. Our kids get exposed to lots of dirty places (child care at the gym; preschool; Marbles, a kids museum with lots of hands-on stuff) and we spend a lot of time washing hands. At Chick-Fil-A, we do a bunch of handwashing after visiting the play area and before jumping into our meals. The staff also disinfects the whole room using a bunch of different sanitizers every night. Not risk elimination, but definitely reduction.

    A Toronto (that's in Canada) city councilor wants public health officers to inspect not just the kitchens and processes in food establishments, but add sanitation of playgrounds to the list as well.

    The councilor, Paul Ainslie, cites an awesome example of some of the risks and challenges in an interview with the Toronto Sun.

    The father of three said he’s had concerns about the cleanliness of those indoor playgrounds, often in fast-food restaurants, for a while.

    “I’ve had concerns for a long time about the play tubes and kids going in and once and a while someone comes out and says a kid crapped his diaper and they go find the manager,” Ainslie said. “One time one of my kids came out with crap on his hands.
    “I just became very concerned about the cleanliness of them and how they are being taken care of.”

    The Ward 43, Scarborough East councillor stressed some restaurants do a great job keeping their play areas clean but not all of them.

    Toronto Public Health officials said Thursday that currently there is “no legislation governing the disinfection of indoor playgrounds in eating establishments.”

    The move would also have the medical officer of health to come up with a checklist for eating establishments who operate an indoor play area to ensure it is a health environment for kids.

    Playgrounds, particularly outdoor ones (with sand or surface bark) have been linked to outbreaks in the past. Pathogens can stick around and persist in soil (especially something hardy like Salmonella) and on fomites like slides (norovirus).
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 20th, 2012 - 11:20am by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    BBC reports that Salmonella Typhimurium DT193 illnesses are on the rise and no one is really sure whether they are linked or what the source might be.

    Health officials are investigating how to stop a rise in cases of a salmonella strain which can leave patients severely ill, the BBC has learned. Cases of Salmonella Typhimurium DT193, rose 630% from 71 in 2004 to 518 in 2011 in England and Wales, said the Health Protection Agency. A Devon man diagnosed with DT193 poisoning in 2011 spent five days in hospital and is still suffering.

    DT193 cases rose in the South West from 14 in 2004 to 73 in 2011. DT193, which is most common in beef and pork, is also found in unpasteurised milk, desserts and sandwiches according to the HPA.

    It said in a statement: "The HPA study, which is ongoing, involves people who were ill being questioned about what they ate and activities they were involved in prior to becoming unwell.
    "The aims of the study are to find any links between those who were unwell and give insights as to how to stop the increase in cases."

    Devon builder Ian Mason, 54, was among eight people who contracted DT193 after attending a hog roast, identified by the HPA as a possible cause of the outbreak, in April 2011.

    S. Typhimurium DT193 was linked to a bunch of European outbreaks in the 80s and 90s. Two of the big outbreaks were linked to pork products (in the UK and Italy).
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
    Salmonella  |  0 Comments
    Epidemiology, salmonella
  • Posted: January 17th, 2012 - 10:00am by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    I've only ever seen a mouse at a restaurant once. I was visiting Halifax (that's in Canada) and had dinner at a popular downtown eatery, Alfredo, Weinstien and Ho's (the ultimate Italian-Deli-Asian food experience - which has apparently closed). For about 10 minutes we saw a mouse dart in and out of view grabbing food from the floor. After flagging our server down and alerting him to the mouse, he and the manager discretely moved some furniture and the mouse fled the room. The manager came over, thanked us for not making a scene and comped all of our meals (but said we had to pay for our bar tab); not a bad deal.

    While mice infestations and droppings elicit a yuck-factor response from TV personalities and guests, I'd prefer to know about how well the staff manages the recognized foodborne illness risk factors: improper cooking temps; improper storage/holding temps; handwashing and hygiene; cross-contamination and safe sources.

    In an excellently-titled post, I’m Ralphin’ It of the Day, The Daily What has a video of a mouse problem at a Philly McDonald's. The video, taken by former employee Karruim Demaio shows a mouse running through a Big Mac bun bag. Pests (rodent and insect) are often a problem for food businesses. Warm, dark places with lots of food is a good spot for a mouse or flies to live. It's not surprising that there are mice in a storage room.

    What is surprising is that Demaio says a manager told him to brush droppings off of the buns and serve them. He says the same manager was seen wiping off pest droppings in the past.

    Who knows whether the brush-and-serve actually happened - but that's where the risk discussion lies. It's not really a problem until the food makes it to a patron. Identifying a pest problem and dealing with it (which might have happened) happens in a business with a good food safety culture; brush-and-serve doesn't. All the video shows is that a mouse was there.

    Video Shows Mouse In Bag Of Big Mac Rolls: MyFoxPHILLY.com

     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 10th, 2012 - 11:26pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    In the classic he said/he said situation the owner of a popular New York diner, George's, says that an restaurant inspector started making up infractions after the owner began documenting what he believed was an unfair inspection. According to the New York Post, owner Bill Koulmentas challenged some of the violations he was being cited for (including poor sanitation and temperature abuse of time/temperature control foods) and pulled out his iPhone when he felt the inspector was going to far. End result was 65 demerit points and a closure.

    “They can do anything they want,” [Koulmentas] said. “Something’s out of control here. It’s lies, lies, lies.”
    Koulmentas said the ordeal that prompted him to break out his cellphone camera began at about 9:30 a.m. yesterday, when Inspector Kenneth Reid began writing one trumped-up violation after another.
    When the inspector crawled under a dishwasher and reported finding 13 roaches in the wall, Koulmentas said he did the same and couldn’t spot anything.

    “I’ll give you $1,000 if you show me a roach,” Koulmentas protested.
    Having experienced a similarly overzealous inspection a month earlier, Koulmentas said he decided to document what was happening.

    Out came the iPhone.

    Health Department spokesman John Kelly defended the inspection as legitimate, noting that George’s — which has been in business since 1950 — had accumulated 56 points under another inspector last month.
    “The inspector recommended closing the place [back then],” reported Kelly. “The supervisor said let’s give him an opportunity to fix the problem. Basically, he caught a break.”

    In August — barely five months ago — the eatery was awarded the top grade of “A.”

     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 10th, 2012 - 11:39am by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    All I know about Jersey I've learned from Don Schaffner, Michele Samarya-Timm, The Sopranos, Snooki and Jon Stewart. In that order. Following the lead of lots of other jurisdictions, the city of Vineland (that's in Jersey) is about to post its restaurant inspection result summaries online - and depending what citizens want, may see entire inspection sheets (that's how it's done in most of North Carolina). According to the Daily Journal, now everyone can see how Vinnie's Pizzeria did on their last visit from an Environmental Health Officer.

    In response to public demand, the city’s health department is now posting restaurant inspection ratings online.
    At least once a year, health department staffers conduct on-site inspections of the city’s more than 400 retail food establishments and review their food handling processes. Inspectors look at things such as the cleanliness of work surfaces, personal hygiene of workers and whether proper temperatures are used when heating, cooling and storing food, said Jeanne Garbarino, the city’s principal sanitary inspector.

    These inspections result in a rating of satisfactory, conditional or unsatisfactory.
    Each business is issued a certificate that by state law must be posted in a conspicuous place to alert patrons of the health rating.

    Inspection reports are public documents, Garbarino said. The new online listing gives diners a central place to review all health ratings as well as the last date of an establishment’s inspection. The health department’s website is www.vldhealth.org.
    This is just the first phase of giving the public more access to information, Garbarino said.
    The next step, she said, is to assemble a focus group of about 15 people who will help determine what other information should be added to the health department’s website.

    They will be asked, “What do you want us to show,” Garbarino said, noting one option is to post full inspection reports, which is already done in Virginia and Rhode Island.

    A couple of restaurant operators who have nothing to hide, and seem to get promoting food safety culture, like the idea:

    Saverio Brunetti of Dominick’s Pizza on South Lincoln Avenue welcomed it.

    Safe food handling is a serious issue, Brunetti said, adding “You don’t want to give a customer a bad product.”
    At Dominick’s Pizza, the health rating certificate is posted on the front wall among the establishment’s accolades so customers can see it.

    “The satisfactory rating is not an achievement, it’s a standard we maintain,” Brunetti said.

    The online rating information would not only be useful to him as a business manager, Brunetti said, he would use it as a diner.
    And, Brunetti said, he might also be tempted to see how his competitors were faring.

    “I don’t see a problem with it,” said Russell Swanson, owner of Bain’s Deli on Landis Avenue, noting customers can already see the satisfactory certificate at the deli.

    Councilman Louis Cresci, the former director of the city’s health department, supported the online postings.

    “The public part of this is supposed to be a motivational tool for these operators,” he said.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 9th, 2012 - 12:50pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Pancakes are a popular breakfast treat around my house. They are so much of a fixture that I asked for (and received) an electric griddle as my only Christmas present. I can now churn out 8-10 pancakes at a time. I don't think I've ever made pancakes that have led to a back injury though.

    Rich Hammond of LA Kings Insider reports (Via Yahoo hockey blogger, and barfblog favorite, Puck Daddy) that Dustin Penner is suffering from a back ailment that was triggered by a stack of "delicious pancakes."

    "I woke up fine, sat down to eat and it locked right up. It never happened to me before. I couldn't stand up. I was probably at the third stage of evolution. So my wife helped me get dressed, and then I drove to the rink here, to hope they could do some magic and get it opened up. Kinger [trainer Chris Kingsley] just looked at me and said, 'Go home.' So I got some treatment and went home.

    "Apparently it's one of those mysterious things, where you can throw it out (from) sneezing. I just leaned over to dip into some delicious pancakes that my wife made. It's just like it [the pain] wraps around you and squeezes. … So it was disappointing. Hopefully it's just an isolated incident, and not something that's going to become chronic."

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
    Celebrity  |  0 Comments
    Hockey, Pancakes
  • Posted: January 9th, 2012 - 11:53am by Ben Chapman

    starbucks.jpg
    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    I like to write at Starbucks. There's something about the background activity and lattes, mixed with Neil Young on my iPod, that helps me focus. I hit up a somewhat new outlet in Raleigh today and needed a restroom break. After washing my hands I looked around the bathroom for paper towels and all I could find was an air dryer (right, exactly as shown). I wanted paper towels, because using them matters; drying friction helps remove pathogens.

    I don't like blow dryers because the literature shows they accumulate microorganisms from toilet aerosols, and can cause contamination of hands as they are dried by the dryer (Coates et al., 1987; Knights, et al., 1993; Redway,et al., 1994). In 2010, Anna Snelling and colleagues at the University of Bradford (UK) also showed that drying with a blow dryer can recontaminate hands and rubbing with paper towel was the most effective method to reduce pathogens.

    Handwashing and food service food safety guru Pete Snyder at the St. Paul-based Hospitality Institute of Technology and Management summarized key aspects of handwashing and drying . Pete says that after hands are washed and rinsed, they must be thoroughly dried and cites data that shows 1-2 log reduction of pathogens from drying. Water and soap loosen the attachment of pathogen to hands. A rinse step dilutes what has been loosened but drying (and the friction associated) is the next step that matters - and the bugs have to go somewhere; I'd rather that be a paper towel instead of being blown all over my pants.

    Pete also notes that it is also apparent that many individuals do not dry their hands thoroughly when using a blow dryer; hence, moisture, which is conducive to microbial growth, remains on hands, or people dry their hands on their clothing.

    Starbucks, proper handwashing requires guest access to the proper tools – and that means vigorously running water, soap and paper towel.

    Coates, D., D. N. Hutchinson, and F. J. Bolton. 1987. Survival of thermophilic campylobacter on fingertips and their elimination by washing and disinfection. Epidem. Inf. 99:265-274.

    Knights, B., C. Evans, S. Barrass, and B. McHardy. 1993. Hand drying - A survey of efficiency and hygiene. The Applied Ecology Research Group, University of Westminster. London, UK.

    Redway, K., B. Knights, Z. Bozoky, A. Theobald, and S.Hardcastle. 1994. Hand drying: A study of bacterial types associated with different hand drying methods and with hot air dryers. Applied Ecology Research Group, University of Westminster. London, UK. 14. Brodie, J. 1965. Hand hygiene. Scot. Med. J. 10:1:115-125.
     

    Your rating: None (5 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 4th, 2012 - 10:25pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Over the past couple of weeks my kids have had pink eye and either rotovirus or norovirus. It's been a mess. We had to miss a couple get togethers including a birthday party. The boys weren't feeling all that bad but we didn't really want to expose other kids to the pathogens. My friend, whose daughter's party we missed, thanked usfor keeping our kids away and reducing their risk of dealing with the same illnesses.

    According to WDIO, Minnesota Department of Health investigators believe that 60 patrons of the Greysolon Ballroom in Duluth, MN who came down with norovirus in early December can blame an ill food handler.

    Doug Schultz, a spokesperson for the agency, said those folks had the Norovirus, which was probably transferred to the food by a sick worker. He said there is no evidence anyone else has gotten sick since.

    We spoke with Sean Stepan, a Greysolon Ballroom spokesperson, last month. He told us they hadn't had any parties cancel reservations, and had not seen a decline in business. Stepan said customers did ask questions about whether they should have any concerns, but offered their support.

    Having a food safety culture where an ill staff member shows up and prepares food isn't the type of place I want to eat.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 4th, 2012 - 3:07pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Outbreaks happen all the time. The majority are avoidable and can be linked to a few factors or bad decisions. While I'm a self-described outbreak junkie, it's not the gore of vomit and barf associated with tragic incidents that I'm interested in. While the stories are important, I'm not into embellishment to scare folks into behavior change. The philosophy I subscribe to is to present folks who make decisions, from the teenage produce stock boy to the CEO of a food company, with the risks and consequences of their actions. And let them make a decision. Hopefully they choose to avoid making people sick.
    I'm an outbreak junkie because the sick and the dead are real people with families; individuals whose lives changed because they ate something. Something, for the most part, that wasn't supposed to make them ill.

    And if nothing is learned from those illnesses, and changes made, food doesn't get any safer.

    In an article in the Yuma Sun detailing produce farmer responses to upcoming Food Safety Modernization Act-related regulatory changes Kurt Nolte, executive director of Yuma County Cooperative Extension references a 2010 E. coli O145 outbreak linked to fresh produce. Investigators connected 33 cases (12 of which were hospitalized) with Arizona grown romaine lettuce.

    “Data suggests the grower followed all guidelines,” Nolte said. An investigation traced the probable cause to a leaking septic tank in a vehicle park some distance away.

    It's frustrating when food folks say that all the right guidelines were followed and illnesses still happened. When this happens food safety professionals aren't doing their jobs. Either the guidelines aren't as good as they thought or implementation faltered (or a combination of both).

    What was left out is that the FDA environmental assessment showed that maybe all guidelines weren't followed. While the ultimate source of contamination was the septic tank, water used for diluting pesticides and fertilizers, and for irrigation, is the most likely vehicle of pathogen transmission onto/on the farm.

    Liquid pesticides and fertilizers used on the lettuce crops were diluted with both municipal and local irrigation canal waters. Municipal water is treated and periodically monitored. Based on these factors, the municipal water was not considered a reasonably likely source of contamination.

    Arizona Leafy Green Marketing Agreement guidelines do have parameters for microbial testing of water that is applied directly to the product, which includes microbial testing. Would be nice to see the history of the test results from the producer for the irrigation canals (and if it did happen, it would have been nice to see mention in the FDA environmental assessment. If the sampling didn't provide any indicators of a problem the guidelines need to be revisited as Nolte notes, “From that incident, our charge is to research the risk of septic tanks leaking deep underground that may leach into a dirt irrigation ditch.”

    Yeah, and show other producers the consequences of mixing potentially risky irrigation water with fungicides and pesticides.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 29th, 2011 - 2:11pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Health officials throughout the U.S. (and elsewhere) continue to push city, county and state politicians to help them communicate how businesses they've visited have fared in inspections. After following the situation for about 10 years, the discussion is predictable - opponents often cite how complicated an inspection form/grade/sign is and say folks wont understand it. Or they suggest businesses will be hurt if inspectors aren't careful with their words. John Norton of the Pueblo Chieftan reports that as the Pueblo City-County Health Department explores posting inspection reports online, the latter was a concern of a local board of health member, Eileen Dennis.

    Dennis expressed concerns about how reports would be worded. Pleased with a sample page on a local restaurant that Carlton showed them, Dennis said, “My concern about the comments was that there wasn’t any poetic license taken. The verbiage is very objective.”

    Vicki Carlton, manager Pueblo City-County Health Department environmental health program said that even though data goes back many years, she decided to limit reports to the previous 12 months in order to simplify the system but still show some history of inspections. The reports will include noncritical violations and will list critical item violations in red. The critical violations are direct threats to public health and must be dealt with quickly.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 23rd, 2011 - 10:49pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Jack made it through his first child care season without much disease excitement --  just a little bit of pink eye and a couple of runny noses.  Child care facilities are notorious illness-spreading sites; children and care providers pass around pathogens like rotavirus, norovirus, Shigella and E. coli. As hand hygiene usually isn't the best in these facilities, outbreaks are often started by or extended by ill people (staff included) showing up while shedding. Cohorting (separating the already sick from the healthy) can be an effective way to limit spread.

    Except sick kids aren't always kept home and staff don't always stay away.

    In an early-release article in Pediatric Infectious Disease, investigators of an outbreak of E. coli O26:H11 linked to a Colorado child care center say that it could have been worse had health authorities hadn't pushed for cohorting. Part of the strategy was to test every staff member and child for STEC - those who were carrying the bug were separated from those who weren't. Sixty percent of the kids and staff at the center were carrying the outbreak strain (41 ill - 4 asymptomatically) and health authorities aggressively kept sick folks away until they stopped shedding.

    Some gems for child care providers from the abstract:

    - The median duration of shedding among symptomatic confirmed cases was 30.5 days.

    - The risk of being a case as in children <36 months was twice the risk among children 36-47 months.

    - Nearly half (49%) of the household contacts of confirmed cases developed a diarrheal illness.

    Outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli serotype O26: H11 infection at a child care center in Colorado
    20.dec.11
    Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
    Brown, Jennifer A. DVM, MPH; Hite, Donna S. BS; Gillim-Ross, Laura A. PHD; Maguire, Hugh F. PHD; Bennett, Janine K. MS; Patterson, Julia J. BA; Comstock, Nicole A. MSPH; Watkins, Anita K. MPH; Ghosh, Tista S. MD, MPH; Vogt, Richard L. MD
    Background: Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O26:H11 is an emerging cause of disease with serious potential consequences in children. The epidemiology and clinical spectrum of O26:H11 are incompletely understood. We investigated an outbreak of O26:H11 infection among children younger than 48 months of age and employees at a child care center.
    Methods: Every employee at the center (n=20) and every child <48 months (n=55) were tested for STEC and administered a questionnaire. Thirty environmental health inspections and site visits were conducted. A cohorting strategy for disease control was implemented.
    Results: Eighteen confirmed and 27 suspect cases were detected. There were no hospitalizations. The illness rate was 60% for children and for employees. The risk of being a case as in children <36 months was twice the risk among children 36-47 months (risk ratio: 2.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.00, 4.42). The median duration of shedding among symptomatic confirmed cases was 30.5 days (range: 14-52 days). Four (22%) confirmed cases were asymptomatic and 3 (17%) shed intermittently. Nearly half (49%) of the household contacts of confirmed cases developed a diarrheal illness. The outbreak was propagated by person-to-person transmission; cohorting was an effective disease control strategy.
    Conclusions: This was the largest reported outbreak of O26:H11 infection in the United States and the largest reported non-O157 STEC outbreak in a U.S. child care center. Non-O157 STEC infection is a differential diagnosis for outbreaks of diarrhea in child care settings. Aggressive disease control measures were effective, but should be evaluated for outbreaks in other settings.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share