Ham

  • Posted: February 5th, 2012 - 7:21pm by Doug Powell

     On Dec. 8, 2011, a biz in Las Vegas had a catered lunch.

    Less than a day later, a bunch of them were barfing.

    The Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) began an investigation the next day after receiving numerous reports of barfing among attendees; excerpts from their report are below.

    Approximately 150 people work at Business A. Of the 63 employees who replied to the electronic survey, 50 reported they consumed food and/or drinks at the luncheon. Of the 50 luncheon attendees, 21 (42%) people met the case definition. An additional 29 people who ate at the luncheon but did not become ill served as non-case study participants. No ill person sought medical attention from a healthcare provider.

    The caterer had a health card that is issued by the SNHD to food handlers. However, the caterer did not hold a catering permit issued by the SNHD, so health types don't know if the same caterer sickened others at others meals because SNDH only tracks complaints against licensed businesses.

    Both the caterer and a representative from Business A reported that the caterer
    arrived at 9:00 am on December 8, and lunch service started at approximately 1230 hrs
    (meal start time among ill persons ranged from 1130 to 1900 hrs) (Fig. 1). The duration
    of the luncheon was unknown.

    The caterer reported that all foods served were pre-cooked and ready-to-eat. The ham and turkey breasts were transported to Business A in a cooler with ice. Both meats were further sliced onsite, placed in bowls and re-heated in 5-6 batches per meat in two small non-commercial microwave ovens that were provided by Business A at the catering site. The caterer reported that food batches were stirred during heating. The caterer alleged the temperature of the meat was 170°F (76.7°C) after heating, but it was unclear where the temperature was taken in the meat. Heated ham slices were pooled in one chafing pan and canned pineapple with its juice was added.

    Heated turkey meat was pooled in another pan and heated canned gravy was added. The
    chafing dishes containing the ham and turkey were warmed by pans of hot water that was heated with Sterno heaters. Both meats were stored in their respective chafing dishes for about 0.5 hr prior to eating, but the duration of time foods were stored in the chafing dishes was not known.

    Upon collecting foods for testing, EH staff observed that leftover foods were stored in a refrigerator that displayed the temperatures of <40°F, with the bulk of the food stored in covered consumer-grade plastic containers. All remaining food in their original containers was collected for testing and included: Mashed potatoes, ham and pineapple topping, green beans, salad with fruits, and two mixed-food plates containing 1) Ham, turkey, mashed potatoes, stuffing, green beans, and 2) Stuffing, mashed potatoes, green beans.

    I’m getting hungry.

    The EH staff sent a formal notice to the caterer requiring all food operations to immediately cease and desist. They also required that the website which advertises the catering business be modified to announce that a permitted food facility will be providing the food to future events that are planned by the catering company. Additionally, EH also issued a bill to the caterer charging for the time that EH staff had spent in investigating the outbreak.

    The isolation of C. perfringens was strongly suggestive that ham was the vehicle of transmission, and an error likely occurred during its re-heating and hot holding during the luncheon service. The heat generated by a small microwave oven might be insufficient to bring all portions of the ham to above 165°F (74°C) to destroy the C. perfringens bacteria. When the heating process is not evenly accomplished, the surviving C. perfringens bacteria can multiply and undergo sporulation. During the holding period where food is kept warm in covered chafing pans for extended periods of time, the spores can germinate to produce vegetative cells and multiply rapidly to large numbers. Ingestion of the bacteria during the luncheon may have resulted in further multiplication and sporulation in the intestine. The release of enterotoxin when C. perfringens sporulates can cause acute diarrhea. To prevent the proliferation of pathogens in potential hazardous food, the US FDA Food Code 2009 recommends that food that are reheated in a microwave for hot holding shall be reheated so that all parts of the food reach a temperature of at least 74oC (165oF) and the food is rotated or stirred, covered, and allowed to stand covered for 2 minutes after reheating (Section
    3-403.11.B). Also, hot holding of such foods should occur at 57oC (135oF) or above
    (Section 3-501.16.A1).

    The majority of C. perfringens outbreaks are often the results of improperly cooled food or food held at room temperature for extended periods. Coupled with concurring epidemiological findings that the contamination and proliferation of the bacteria may have occurred at the luncheon, no further food traceback or recall action of the ham was implemented by the FDA.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 20th, 2011 - 3:52pm by Doug Powell

    Neil Young once had to cancel some tour dates because he sliced a guitar finger while making a ham sandwich.

    New Zealand's state-run Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC), which offers universal insurance cover for accidents, released figures today showing the cost of treatment, rehabilitation and compensation for accidents recorded last Christmas Day have topped $NZ1.9 million ($1.45 million).

    That includes several claims for ham-related injuries - including carving mishaps and burns, neck and knee strains from carrying heavy hams, and even a crushed finger after a ham toppled from a stand.

    Most of the 3,040 Christmas Day injuries accepted by ACC resulted from outdoor activities - including frisbee, fishing, slippery sliding, trampolining and poolside antics.

    One person laughed so hard they fainted, hitting their head in the garden, another broke their tooth on a dislodged gem that ended up on the menu, and someone taking their post-lunch nap was injured when a drunk person stood on their face.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 23rd, 2010 - 2:27pm by Doug Powell

    The Australian discount supermarket Franklins has had to recall a small amount of Farmfresh Half Bone in Leg Hams with use by dates between January 24, 2011 and January 29, 2011 inclusive due to an unpleasant odour that persists after opening.

    Franklins have yet to determine the cause of the odour as laboratory testing is not able to be completed until after Christmas.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 10th, 2010 - 3:56pm by Doug Powell

    When food safety types arrived for a routine inspection at a bacon producer on Dec. 17, 2009, they found the company had started cooking and selling hams at the premises.

    The Wiltshire Gazete and Herald reports a subsequent inspection of the ham production area found problems with cleaning and food safety management, including structural defects and poorly maintained equipment.

    Remedial Action Notices were served requiring them to stop the production and sale of cooked meats at the premises. The company, Sandridge Farmhouse Bacon Ltd in Bromham, agreed to voluntarily surrender all the hams on site because they had not been produced in accordance with the relevant food safety legislation.

    Sandridge Farmhouse Bacon Ltd and the managing director, Roger Keen, pleaded guilty to all seven charges brought by Wiltshire Council, which were:

    Failure to ensure the council had up-to-date information about the business and its operations
    Failure to have in place a food safety management system
    Failure to ensure the design and construction of the premises helped protect against the formation of condensation and mould on surfaces
    Failure to ensure the premises was kept clean and maintained in good repair and condition
    Three counts of failing to ensure that surfaces (including the surfaces of equipment) in areas where foods were handled were in a sound condition and easy to clean and disinfect.

    In addition to the fine, Mr Keen and Sandridge Farmhouse Bacon Ltd were ordered to pay costs of £1,000 and a £15 victim surcharge – for a total of £18,000.

    Councillor Keith Humphries, Cabinet member for health and wellbeing, said,

    “This was a deliberate attempt by the business to supply food for the festive season which was produced in unsatisfactory conditions. I commend the food safety officers for their prompt action in removing the food from sale and safeguarding public health.”

    Since the inspection last December standards at the premises have greatly improved and they are now able to resume ham production.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: August 4th, 2010 - 9:34pm by Doug Powell

    Sarah Schmidt of Postmedia News writes tonight in a story that will appear across Canada tomorrow that federal meat inspectors didn't find any problems that needed fixing at a meat-processing plant in the months leading up to last week's massive recall of Brandt deli meats.

    The Canadian Food Inspection Agency only identified sanitation issues, deficiencies in the company's environmental testing program and possible undercooking after public-health officials linked a salmonella outbreak linked to Brandt meat, Postmedia News has learned.

    The July 31 national recall of all ready-to-eat meats manufactured by G. Brandt Meat Packers at its Mississauga, Ont., plant followed 23 confirmed cases of salmonella associated with Brandt headcheese by public-heath authorities in British Columbia and one case in Ontario. It was B.C. health officials — not the government meat inspector stationed at the plant — who first alerted CFIA brass to take a closer look at the plant.

    As a result of the investigation launched on July 14, CFIA issued the first of nine corrective action reports, including one singling out how well the meat was cooked and related record-keeping.

    The case raises questions about the state of Canada's meat inspection system two years after 22 Canadians died following the consumption of listeria-tainted Maple Leaf deli meats, also produced at a federally inspected plant.

    In addition to finding salmonella in headcheese products manufactured at the Brandt plant, CFIA also found Listeria monocytogenes in the company's Ham Suelze.

    Caroline Spivak, a spokeswoman for Brandt Meat Packers, emphasized there have been no positive salmonella product tests for any deli meats other than headcheese. See, it’s just the headcheese, and if you eat that stuff, who knows what risks you are taking.

    "There's always a CFIA inspector that tests the product, so the company stands by its product and is not in the habit of undercooking their food.”

    But they did. And got caught. Sorta.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 26th, 2010 - 12:21pm by Doug Powell

    Sometimes, for mental floss, I check out the blog, It Was Over When: Tales of Romantic Dead Ends. Today’s post came from Michelle.

    I prepared a nice meal for my husband. He was hungry but also had to poop. So, he took his plate into the bathroom and ate it while he was pooping. To this day I cannot eat ham.

    — Michelle

    Aftermath: Divorce.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share