Recall

  • Posted: January 19th, 2012 - 1:57pm by Doug Powell

     Leasa Industries Co., Inc. of Miami, FL is recalling 346 cases of LEASA Living Alfalfa Sprouts with use by date 2/1/12, because it has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella.

    LEASA Living Alfalfa Sprouts with use by date 2/1/12 were distributed through FL, GA, AL, LA, and MS through retail stores and food service companies on 1/4/12, 1/5/12, 1/6/12, 1/7/12 and 1/8/12.

    The affected product is in 6 oz. clear plastic containers with a UPC code of 75465-55912 and has an expiration date of 2/1/12. The UPC code is located on the side of the label at the side of the container. The expiration date of the package is located on the side of the container.

    Supermarket Winn-Dixie went further, pulling all Leasa sprouts off its shelves.

    No illnesses have been reported to date.

    A table of sprout-related outbreaks is available at http://bites.ksu.edu/sprouts-associated-outbreaks.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 7th, 2012 - 4:02pm by Doug Powell

    When should the consuming public be informed a food may make them barf? Under what conditions should a food be recalled or pulled from commerce? What guidelines exist that can be publicly scrutinized and improved?

    Another confusing chapter to the when to go public saga was added when Arizona-grown lettuce was pulled from some supermarkets in late Dec. after lettuce from a nearby field tested positive for salmonella.

    Mike Hornick of The Packer writes that Growers Express’ decision to pull iceberg lettuce from the market after a nearby field tested positive for salmonella appears to be an unprecedented food safety step, but many peers agreed with the company’s “abundance of caution.”

    Chief executive officer Jamie Strachan said on Jan. 5, “Our response is in line with what any other responsible company would do. We have a responsibility to protect public health, and it is always better to err on the side of caution.”

    The Kroger retail chain publicized the withdrawal, which led to no known illnesses, New Year’s weekend, and it was picked up in many consumer media outlets.

    Joe Pezzini, chief operating officer of Castroville, Calif.-based Ocean Mist Farms and a California Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement board member, said he doesn’t remember a similar case, but details set instances apart.

    “What it does speak to is the really heightened precaution companies are taking regarding any possible risk of contamination. Every business in that situation is going to have to assess that for themselves. You’d really have to know the details and come to a conclusion on what the prudent reaction is.”

    Hank Giclas, senior vice president for science and technology at Western Growers, Irvine, Calif., agreed.

    “It’s a hard decision to make, and to make it means they’re acting in the public interesd. There must have been compelling information to withdraw the product. If you believe there may be potential for your product to be contaminated, it’s the responsible thing to withdraw or hold it.”

    “We are not immediately aware of any other farms taking this precaution, but that doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened,” said Sebastian Cianci, spokesman for the Food and Drug Administration.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 15th, 2011 - 1:34pm by Doug Powell

    The sick person lede was buried, again, and I didn’t realize from a CFIA press release someone had gotten listerosis from eating Clic brand cheese and/or butter in Canada.

    That’s how government types roll.

    Worse, the expanded recall issued yesterday was a month after an initial limited recall, yet product was still sitting on shelves.

    Canadian Food Safety Inspection Agency (CFIA) recall specialist Garfield Balsom told FoodQualityNews.com, “During a review of the company’s voluntary recall it was discovered that several products had been missed. The manufacturer has ceased production at its facilities and the CFIA working with them to make sure other products manufactured by the company are safe to consume.”

    Did the one identified individual get sick from consuming Clic products that were previously recalled? In the original Nov. 11, 2011 recall notice, no one was sick.

    The following cheese products, bearing establishment number 1874, and any Best Before dates up to and including those listed below, are affected by this alert:

    Brand Product Size UPC Last Best Before date
    Clic Moujadalé 300 – 400 g None 11 MAR 2012
    Clic Riviera 300 – 400 g None 11 FEB 2012
    Clic Tressé 300 – 400 g None 11 NOV 2012
    Clic Vachekaval 300 – 400 g None 11 MAR 2012

    The following dairy products bear establishment number 1874. These products have a four digit lot code. If the last 2 digits of the lot code are 45 or lower, e.g. xx-45, xx-44, etc, they are affected by this alert:

    Brand Product Size UPC
    Clic Desi Butter Ghee 454 g (1 lbs) None
    Clic Desi Butter Ghee 907 g (2 lbs) None

    These products have been distributed in Quebec and Ontario. These products may also have been distributed to other provinces.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: October 27th, 2011 - 12:50am by Doug Powell

    People who forgot to mention they had eaten sprouts may have thrown disease trackers off the trail as they sought to trace the source of the deadly strain of E. coli that sickened more than 4,300 people and killed at least 50 in Europe this year, according to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

    While a definitive genetic link remains elusive, three separate lines of investigation point to sprouts as the means by which the deadly O1O4:H4 strain of the bacteria was spread, researchers led by Udo Buchholz at the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, Germany’s disease-control agency.

    Buchholz and colleagues wrote, “The one dish that frequently exposed guests to sprouts was the side salad, which contained tomatoes, cucumbers, three sorts of leaf salads, and sprouts. Sprouts may have been the ingredient that visitors recalled least in such a mixed salad.”

    Buchholz and colleagues conducted three studies in parallel. The first involved asking patients hospitalized with E. coli infection about their recent food consumption, and comparing that with food eaten by uninfected people. It found that “the only significant variable was sprouts.”

    The second study identified 10 groups of diners who ate at a restaurant in Luebeck between May 12 and 16. It found that among 115 people who had been served sprouts, 31 fell ill, compared with none of those who had not eaten sprouts.

    The third investigation traced 41 clusters of infections to a producer in Lower Saxony, who grew sprouts from seeds that came from a “supplier X,” Buchholz and colleagues wrote, without identifying either the producer or the supplier. A European Commission task force said in July that the sprouts were probably grown from fenugreek seeds imported from Egypt in 2009. The researchers still don’t know whether the seeds were contaminated before, during or after export from Egypt.

    In an accompanying editorial, Martin J. Blaser, M.D. from the Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, New York University, writes the chain of transmission appears to have begun in Egypt, with fecal contamination of fenugreek seeds by either humans or farm animals during storage or transportation, perhaps as long ago as 2009. The seeds then went to a European distributor and from there to farms in several countries. During sprout germination, bacteria multiplied and moved from farm to restaurants and consumers, as Buchholz et al. extensively detail in their study. The evidence for such a series of events is compelling, even though the organism was not identified at the earliest steps, since the trail often is cold in point-source outbreaks by the time investigators are able to conduct trace-back investigations.

     

    German outbreak of Escherichia coli O104:H4 associated with sprouts
    26.oct.11
    The New England Journal of Medicine
    Udo Buchholz, M.D., M.P.H., Helen Bernard, M.D., Dirk Werber, D.V.M., Merle M. Böhmer, Cornelius Remschmidt, M.D., Hendrik Wilking, D.V.M., Yvonne Deleré, M.D., Matthias an der Heiden, Ph.D., Cornelia Adlhoch, D.V.M., Johannes Dreesman, Ph.D., Joachim Ehlers, D.V.M., Steen Ethelberg, Ph.D., Mirko Faber, M.D., Christina Frank, Ph.D., Gerd Fricke, Ph.D., Matthias Greiner, D.V.M., Ph.D., Michael Höhle, Ph.D., Sofie Ivarsson, M.Sc., Uwe Jark, D.V.M., Markus Kirchner, M.D., M.P.H., Judith Koch, M.D., Gérard Krause, M.D., Ph.D., Petra Luber, Ph.D., Bettina Rosner, Ph.D., M.P.H., Klaus Stark, M.D., Ph.D., and Michael Kühne, D.V.M., Ph.D.
    http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1106482?query=featured_home
    Human infection with Shiga-toxin–producing Escherichia coli is a major cause of postdiarrheal hemolytic–uremic syndrome. This life-threatening disorder, which is characterized by acute renal failure, hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia, typically affects children under the age of 5 years. Shiga-toxin–producing E. coli O157 is the serogroup that is most frequently isolated from patients with the hemolytic–uremic syndrome worldwide.1
    In May 2011, a large outbreak of the hemolytic–uremic syndrome associated with the rare E. coliserotype O104:H4 occurred in Germany.2-5 The main epidemiologic features were that the peak of the epidemic was reached on May 21 and May 224,5 and that the vast majority of case subjects either resided or had traveled in northern Germany. Almost all patients from other European countries or from North America had recently returned from northern Germany.2,6,7 Of the affected case subjects, 90% were adults, and more than two thirds of case subjects with the hemolytic–uremic syndrome were female.4
    Early studies in Hamburg suggested that infections were probably community-acquired and were not related to food consumption in a particular restaurant. A first case–control study that was conducted on May 23 and 24 suggested that raw food items, such as tomatoes, cucumbers, or leaf salad,3 were the source of infection. The consumption of sprouts, which was previously implicated in outbreaks of Shiga-toxin–producing E. coli in the United States8 and Japan,9 was mentioned by only 25% of case subjects in exploratory interviews, so consumption of sprouts was not tested analytically.
    This report describes the investigations that were conducted by the federal agencies under the auspices of the German Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Food, Agriculture, and Consumer Protection, as well as by the respective state agencies, to identify the vehicle of infection of this international outbreak.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: October 1st, 2011 - 8:35pm by Doug Powell

    Pig’s ears are apparently used in meals around the world, such as Oreja de Cerdo in Spain (right); in North America, pig’s ears are most often used as dog treats.

    Thousands of packages of cooked pigs ears produced in Spain and distributed in southern France have been recalled after testing positive for Listeria monocytogenes.

    Our French friend Albert Amgar provided the link to the AFP story, and Amy translated on the way home from New Zealand this morning.

    The Roussillon Salaisons company which makes pork products and prepared meals in Perpignan initiated their own recall of the products in question from the concerned stores. In cases where the product had already been sold, it is requesting that people who still have the product not eat it and either destroy it or return it for a refund.

    Those who might have eaten the incriminated product and who have symptoms such as fever, with or without headache, are encouraged to consult their doctor and indicate what they have eaten.

    Pregnant women must be especially attentive to these symptoms, as should be immune-depressed and elderly people.

    The implicated products are 3200 vacuum-packed bags of plain cooked pigs ears and Galician style cooked pigs ears, both from the Régal Catalan brand. They were sold from July 4 in a few dozen Leader Price stores in Aquitaine, Midi-Pyrénées, Languedoc-Roussillon and Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur, the company explained.

    They come from two imported lots from Spain with the numbers 07072011and a best by date of 5 October 2011, and 27062011, best by date 25 September 2011. Roussillon Salaisons insisted that the products were made by the Spanish firm Carnes Esman and not by Roussillon Salaisons itself. Roussillon Salaison emphasized that it does make certain pork products but in this case it only sold the pigs ears.

    Listeria was discovered during a routine test undertaken by a Leader Price store.
    Roussillon Salaisons was alerted to the problem Friday and said that they immediately asked all the stores to pull the product from their shelves and to put up a poster to notify consumers. But the health authorities asked that the company additionally alert consumers through the media, the company explained.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: September 14th, 2011 - 4:02pm by Doug Powell

    Sanith Ourn Farm of Indiantown, Florida, is recalling Fresh Hot Basil herb because it may have the potential to be contaminated with salmonella.

    The recalled Fresh Hot Basil was distributed to retailers and one wholesale location in WA, OR, and RI on August 23, 2011 and August 30, 2011. Hot Basil has a 5 day shelf life.

    Three hundred and ninety pounds (390 lbs) of product was shipped in 10 lb. shipping containers marked with FLT DATE of 08/23/11 and 08/30/11. Retailers may have bundled or wrapped the hot basil in small foam trays prior to placing on retail shelves.

    No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this problem.

    This issue was identified through routine sampling by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: September 11th, 2011 - 7:05am by Doug Powell

    On July 29, 2011, U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) issued a public health alert due to concerns about illnesses caused by Salmonella Heidelberg that may be associated with use and consumption of ground turkey produced by a Cargill plant in Arkansas.

    On August 3, Cargill recalled 36 million pounds of ground turkey that had been linked to the outbreak through microbiological testing. By Aug. 18, 2011, 111 persons infected with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Heidelberg were identified in 31 states. The outbreak had been apparently going on for months, and no one knew the source.

    But that didn’t stop Cargill from restarting the Arkansas plant on Aug. 16, and establishing a blue-ribbon science advisory panel on Aug. 26. Steve Willardsen, president of Cargill’s Wichita-based turkey processing business said at the time, the company has implemented the most aggressive salmonella monitoring and testing program in the poultry industry.

    Guess they found something.

    A couple of hours ago, Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation of Springdale, Ark. recalled approximately 185,000 pounds of ground turkey products that may be contaminated with a strain of Salmonella Heidelberg.

    USDA-FSIS said, “The strain of SalmonellaHeidelberg in question is identical to that of an outbreak of Salmonellosis that resulted in an August 3, 2011 recall of ground turkey products. Although a sample tested positive for the outbreak related strain ofSalmonella, including the identical XbaI and BlnI PFGE patterns matching the August 3 outbreak strain, at this time, neither FSIS nor the plant is aware of any illnesses associated with product from the above dates. An FSIS incident investigation team collected samples at the establishment following the previous recall. Today's recall occurred after a product sample collected on August 24 tested positive for the outbreak strain ofSalmonella Heidelberg. The firm is recalling product from August 30 based on pending positive match samples. The products subject to recall are derived from bone-in parts.”

    The products subject to recall include:

    Fresh Ground Turkey Chubs
    • 16 oz. (1 lb.) chubs of Fresh HEB Ground Turkey 85/15 with Use or Freeze by Dates of 09/12/2011, 09/13/2011, 09/19/2011 and 09/20/2011
    • 16 oz. (1 lb.) chubs of Honeysuckle White 85/15 Fresh Ground Turkey with Use or Freeze by Dates of 09/19/2011, 09/20/2011 and 09/21/2011

    Fresh Ground Turkey Trays
    • 19.2 oz. (1.2 lb.) trays of Honeysuckle White 85/15 Ground Turkey with Use or Freeze by Dates of 09/10/2011 and 09/12/2011
    • 48.0 oz. (3 lb.) trays of Kroger Ground Turkey Fresh 85/15 with Use or Freeze by Dates of 09/17/2011, 09/18/2011 and 09/19/2011
    • 48.0 oz. (3 lbs.) trays of Honeysuckle White 85/15 Ground Turkey Family Pack with Use or Freeze by Dates of 09/11/2011, 09/12/2011, 09/13/2011, 09/15/2011, 09/17/2011 and 09/18/2011
    • 16 oz. (1 lb.) trays of Honeysuckle White 85/15 Ground Turkey with a Use or Freeze by Date of 09/11/2011

    Fresh Ground Turkey Patties
    • 16.0 oz. (1 lb.) trays of Honeysuckle White Ground Turkey Patties with a Use or Freeze by Date of 09/18/2011
    16 oz. (1 lb.) trays of Kroger Ground Seasoned Turkey Patties Fresh 85/15 with a Use or Freeze by Date of 09/17/2011The products subject to recall today bear the establishment number "P-963" inside the USDA mark of inspection. The products were produced on August 23, 24, 30 and 31 of this year.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: August 19th, 2011 - 12:00am by Doug Powell

    WLWT reports that 2 E. coli O157:H7 illnesses in the Cincinnati area has led J.B. Meats to recall approximately 72,800 pounds of ground beef sold to local restaurants.

    The products subject to recall are 5 and 10 pound clear packages of ground beef and ground beef patties in various size packages that were processed on and can be identified by the dates Aug. 18, 2010 through Aug. 18, 2011. The product was sold to restaurants in the Cincinnati area, but the company did not say which restaurants.

    Each clear plastic bag and label bear the establishment number “EST. 1188” within the Ohio Department of Agriculture’s mark of inspection.

    The company said it was notified on Aug. 12 of an investigation of two E. coli O157:H7 illnesses. The Cincinnati Health Department reported there were two patients who became ill on July 20 and 21 that may have resulted from ground beef consumed on July 16 and 17, the company said.

    As a result of the ensuing investigation, it was determined there is a possible link between the ground beef products produced by J.B. Meats on July 15 and the illnesses in Ohio.

    The company said the recall is precautionary, as there has been no conclusive link between the illnesses and the ground beef produced at the facility. As an additional precaution, the company said it is recalling all ground beef production from the date of this announcement for the previous year.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: August 4th, 2011 - 11:34pm by Doug Powell

    communication.jpg

    The massive ground turkey recall that Cargill Inc. announced this week is raising questions about whether federal food safety regulators should have moved faster to limit a nationwide salmonella outbreak.

    I told Mike Hughlett and David Shaffer of Minnesota Star Tribune that, "Part of the problem is the absence of clear guidelines about when to go public."

    Doug Powell, a food safety expert at Kansas State University who felt that the recall process was slow with the ground turkey, said food regulators appeared to become more conservative after a big salmonella outbreak in 2008. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration first linked it to tomatoes, only to find out later that jalapeno peppers were the most likely cause. The tomato industry cried foul after it got crushed financially.

    The recall that Minnetonka-based Cargill announced late Wednesday covers 36 million pounds of ground turkey, one of the biggest U.S. meat recalls. It's linked to a particularly virulent strain of salmonella that has infected 78 people in 26 states and led to one death.

    The recall involves ground turkey produced as early as February, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture had indications going back to at least July 20 that the culprit might be a Cargill plant in Arkansas.

    The timing of the recall highlights a dilemma for the nation's food regulators over when to go public with recall information. Go too late, and public health could suffer. Go too early and make a mistake, and a corporation or industry's reputation could unduly suffer.

    In Sacramento County, Calif., where a woman older than 65 died in June from the latest outbreak, the county's health officer brought up another factor bedeviling food regulators these days: budget cutting.

    Dr. Glennah Trochet said her department now responds more slowly to outbreaks, sometimes delaying investigations a week or two. Public health workers often aren't available to interview possible victims. She suspects other agencies face the same constraints. "If you want rapid response, you need to have the resources to do rapid response," Trochet said.

    This is something I hear from public health types across the country; it’s almost amazing outbreaks get tracked down at all given the fiscal mess at the state and local levels.

    The salmonella outbreak linked to Cargill ground turkey began in early March. Chris Braden, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's director of foodborne diseases, said on Thursday that it was a slowly building outbreak in the beginning.

    After recognizing an "unusual clustering" of Salmonella Heidelberg cases, the CDC began investigating on May 23, Braden said. About the same time, routine surveillance by a federal food monitoring system found the same strain of Salmonella Heidelberg in ground turkey in stores.

    The monitoring service found four positive samples, one each in April, May, June and July, Braden said. Those four samples were traced to Cargill's Arkansas plant, he said, though he didn't elaborate on when.

    David Goldman, a public health administrator in the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service, told reporters that by July 20 or 21, the agency had traced back two cases from the salmonella outbreak to Cargill's Arkansas plant. A third traceback to the same plant was confirmed last week.

    Late Friday, the USDA put out a public warning about salmonella dangers in ground turkey, without naming the suspected source. Recalls are often initiated when food regulators tell a company they suspect it's the source of an outbreak.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: June 21st, 2011 - 4:59am by Doug Powell

    So that’s why the U.S. Food and Drug Administration made a big deal about their new import monitoring program yesterday: because today, government auditors say FDA is often sloppy and inattentive in their efforts to ensure that contaminated foods from abroad are withdrawn promptly and completely from the nation’s food supply.

    Gardiner Harris reports in this morning’s New York Times that in an audit of 17 recalls, investigators found FDA often failed to follow its own rules in removing dangerous imported foods from the market, according to Daniel R. Levinson, inspector general of the Department of Health and Human Services.

    The products included cantaloupes from Honduras contaminated with salmonella, frozen mussel meat from New Zealand infected with listeria and frozen fish from Korea that contained the bacterium that causes botulism.

    In one case, more than three months passed from the time the F.D.A. became aware of the contamination to the time a recall was initiated. In another case, the lag was nearly a month. In 13 of the 17 cases, the companies that supplied the tainted goods failed to provide accurate or complete information to their customers so that the products could be withdrawn completely, the audit found.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share