Social Media

  • Posted: January 22nd, 2012 - 11:38pm by Doug Powell

    This sounds like norovirus. And some investigators discovering that youngsters use different ways to communicate.

    Michelle Ferguson tried to avoid it, but the rapid onslaught of nausea took its toll on her body when she suddenly vomited in the back seat of a school bus last weekend.

    She and her fellow delegates, attending a journalism conference in downtown Victoria, were on their way to the Vertigo nightclub for the final gala when dozens of formally dressed students started vomiting on the buses, in their hotel and at the club.

    Almost instantly, messages on Twitter told the stories of people suffering from extreme stomach pain, vomiting and diarrhea. Staff at Canadian University Press, who organize the conference every year, contacted health officials as the numbers increased. Within minutes, delegates were asked to return to the Harbour Towers Hotel and Suites.

    The well-documented outbreak is considered a successful example of the effectiveness of communicating through social media. The conference's Twitter hashtag, #nash74, led news agencies to the story, became a slick crisis-control tool and has inspired health officials to consider using similar methods to monitor outbreaks.

    "It would be fascinating to learn how to use social media to control and manage outbreaks like they did," said Dr. Murray Fyfe, chief medical health officer for the Vancouver Island Health Authority. "I'm sure some were able to limit their exposure because of it."

    Messages about the widespread vomiting were sent out on #nash74. CUP staff saw the numbers climbing and shut down the gala.

    CUP staff went door-to-door as well, but nothing worked more efficiently than Twitter, according to students.

    "I feel a lot more people would have gotten sick without Twitter," Mattern said. "This whole thing would have played out a lot differently."

    Methods for tracking and managing outbreaks could change because of the role Twitter played in this incident.

    Fyfe and his staff have analyzed the Twitter feed from the conference and could follow how the outbreak spread.

    "A traditional investigation would have trouble getting those details," he said. "We're interested in partnering with people who have expertise in social media to use it as a tool to investigate outbreaks and as a communication tool to control outbreaks."

    Contact us any time.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 22nd, 2012 - 8:11pm by Doug Powell

    Last May, it was reported that 195 of the 580 people served Easter Brunch at Luciano's Cotton Club in Worcester, Mass. were struck by norovirus contracted from a sick employee, and the incident was chronicled on Yelp and a food safety site called barfblog.com.

    “I would really drive home the point that they had a problem, investigated to determine what it is, and outlined a plan for what we're going to do from now on,” said Gregory Charland, founder and chief executive officer of Charland Technology, a Hubbardston-based company offering a wide range of technology services. “Organizations should use problems like that to really do some soul searching and figure out how and why this happened. The overriding concept to underline is that they are never going to have their name in the news about this again.”

    (Hint, and it’s in the blog post: don’t let sick employees work, even at an Easter buffet).

    Alex Barbosa, the restaurant's manager, declined comment.

    That’s one anecdote in a story about on-line reviewing, which some love and some hate.

    Alec Lopez dislikes consumer-driven review websites like Yelp, TripAdvisor and UrbanSpoon.

    The owner of Armsby Abey in Worcester, Mass. said, “I don't read reviews often,” Mr. Lopez said. “I hate Yelp because it's an unanswered forum for people to bitch. I feel like it's a green light to voice your opinion without consequences.”

    Worcester native Andrew Chandler, a 29-year-old medical student at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, had an unpleasant dining experience at Armsby Abbey, and chronicled it on Yelp.

    “I was really sad to have done it, but I think that when a place isn't responsive or accommodating, people should know about it. I was hoping Armsby Abbey would read it and respond. I think it goes a long way if a manager explains what the circumstances were, and how they'll prevent the problem from happening again. Today, online reviews can make or break a customer's decision.”

    In September, Harvard Business School professor Michael Luca released research that found a one-star rating increase on Yelp directly led to a 5 percent to 9 percent boost in revenue for independent restaurants, with comparable projections for independents in other industries. Despite the growing influence of Yelp and similar websites, business owners like Mr. Lopez continue to ignore — or worse, incorrectly address — negative feedback when it comes in the form of an online review.

    With 61 million monthly visitors and 22 million reviews online by the end of the third quarter last year, Yelp is the most popular online review destination for everything from dentists to dieticians. Yelp's popularity is proof that consumers trust reviews written by the average Joe, and enjoy contributing their own 2 cents.

    Wilson Wang, chef and owner of Baba Sushi in Worcester, said he checks online reviews of his restaurant “all the time,” monitoring what diners like — and don't like.

    Mr. Wang, whose customers' reviews currently rank Baba Sushi 4.5 out of 5 stars on Yelp.com, said he doesn't respond personally to people's comments but rather sees such reviews “as a mirror” to reveal what could be done better. “We are on the high level and we are really proud,” he said last week.

    Yelp and websites like it open the door for independent businesses with limited marketing budgets, giving them an opportunity to advertise through old-fashioned word of mouth in a high-tech world. They offer a safety net to consumers who, with a few keystrokes, can be reassured that trying something new — rather than falling back on the reliability of a chain — won't be a waste of their money.

    “Every time I've given a negative review and gotten some sort of constructive, non-judgmental response, I've made it a point to go back to whatever business it was and give them a clean slate,” said Amy Jamieson, a 42-year-old Yelp user and homemaker from Worcester. “If they're willing to try again, so am I.”

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 19th, 2011 - 5:37am by Doug Powell

    Just make us look cool.

    That’s the nerd request Chapman and I are thinking inside when doing interviews, borrowed, like all our lines, from a decent movie, Almost Famous (that's Zooey Deschanel, right, exactly as shown, telling her brother in the movie, "don't worry, someday you'll be cool").

    Loreal Lynch of schools.com wrote about a selection of some innovative ways college professors are using Facebook and other social media tools to teach.

    barfblog.com came in at number 8, and my Kansas State colleague Mike Wesch, a professor of cultural anthropology who uses YouTube videos to explore the ideas of media ecology and cultural anthropology, came in at number 9.
     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: June 17th, 2011 - 12:42pm by Doug Powell

    Maybe I’m losing something in translation, but Xinhua reports that experts in China have called for strengthening moral education to ensure food safety following a string of scandals in recent months.

    Zhao Chenggen, an expert at the School of Government at Peking University, said on Wednesday that to promote moral education is conducive to urging food producers to place a higher value on public health.

    Under the influence of moral cultivation, food producers could enhance their subjective consciousness to resist ill-gotten gains through adding toxic materials into food, he said.

    "Moral decline in the food industry is more terrible than that in social communications," said another expert, Xu Yaotong, a professor of political science at the National School of Administration.

    Premier Wen Jiabao said, "A country without the improved quality of its people and the power of morality will never grow into a mighty and respected power.”

    Wen said that advancing the moral and cultural construction would help safeguard normal production, life and social order, as well as to eradicate the stain of swindling, corruption and other illegal conduct.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: May 20th, 2011 - 7:58am by Doug Powell

    With the latest rapture arriving tomorrow, May 21, a U.S. Centers for Disease Control blog post mentioning a "zombie apocalypse" as a lighthearted way to get Americans to read about preparing for the hurricane season drove so much traffic that it crashed the website.

    The Zombie Apocalypse campaign is a social media effort by the CDC's Public Health and Preparedness center to spread the word about preparing for the June 1 start of hurricane season.

    "There are all kinds of emergencies out there that we can prepare for," the blog post starts innocently enough. "Take a zombie apocalypse for example ... You may laugh now, but when it happens you'll be happy you read this, and hey, maybe you'll even learn a thing or two about how to prepare for a real emergency."

    "If you prepare for the zombie apocalypse, you'll be prepared for all hazards," CDC spokesman Dave Daigle told Reuters over the phone on Thursday.
    The word zombie comes from voodoo practice of spirit possession where "zombies" are stripped of consciousness.

    Daigle said that a typical CDC blog post might get between 1,000 and 3,000 hits. The most traffic on record had been a post that saw around 10,000 visits.
    By the end of Wednesday, with servers down, the page had 60,000. By Thursday, it was a trending topic on Twitter.

    The campaign was designed to reach a young, media-savvy demographic that the CDC had not been able to capture before, Daigle said.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: April 16th, 2011 - 1:11pm by Doug Powell

    Keep using those fancy cell phones and social media to hold people accountable.

    According to The Tico Times, Nelly Campos joined three of her friends for a meal at Café Mundo on March 22. After having some appetizers at a cocktail reception, she ordered a light meal of bruschetta topped with tomato, cheese and basil. She finished her meal with a portion of sugary pecan pie.

    The following night Campos and her friends all experienced symptoms of food poisoning: vomiting, diarrhea, body aches and dehydration. One of the women, Francella Conejo, ended up in the hospital.

    Two weeks later, the Health Ministry shuttered Café Mundo, citing unsanitary conditions. A health report released by the ministry remarked on various health code violations found on the morning of April 5.

    Inspectors observed surfaces that were neither washed nor disinfected, cleaning solutions were placed near the liquors, uncooked meat settled next to vegetables in the kitchen. The restaurant was undergoing remodeling but no separation existed between the construction area and the kitchen. Dust coated the walls, floors and tables in the kitchen.

    “The food was tasty,” Conejo said. “There’s no way we could’ve imagined the level of problems that existed [in the kitchen].”

    The reports of food poisoning at Café Mundo seemed to occur over a three-week period beginning in mid-March. But the decision to close the popular San José restaurant in Barrio Otoya didn’t occur until early April. Instead Campos and others, with the help of social network Facebook, gathered the names of food poisoning victims at Café Mundo and encouraged them to create an uproar.

    In the end, the Health Ministry received 25 to 35 “denuncias,” or complaints.

    Each complaint represented one member of a family or a dinner with friends or business gathering that had been affected by the restaurant’s food.

    On March 31, Cristy Valdés had a friend post her criticism about Café Mundo on the Facebook page of Health Minister María Avila. Valdés began her message by saying, “I don’t know whether to laugh or cry or whether to denounce Café Mundo or the Health Ministry.” She went on to explain that after the incident occurred, Valdés spent three days calling the Health Ministry trying to file a complaint. Once she explained what happened, Valdés said she was told that four denuncias weren’t enough to lead to an inspection. On Facebook though, the complaints found an audience.

    Valdés learned from one commenter that another woman named Nelly Campos was putting together a list of those afflicted by a meal at Café Mundo. They worked together to find people who alleged food poisoning from an unsanitary meal. Valdés also continued to call Café Mundo, only to have the people working the phone deny that customers had called about any grievances with the food.

    As Valdés built up her list, a member of the Health Ministry started noticing the outcry on Facebook over Café Mundo.

    On April 6, 2011 health inspectors dropped by Café Mundo, saw numerous violations and shut down the prominent tourist dining spot.

    The networking done by Valdés, Campos and others had compelled the government to take action.

    Reached by phone Thursday, Café Mundo’s owner Diego Meléndez said the restaurant plans to reopen during the first week of May. He contradicted some of the claims made in the Health Ministry's report, saying there was a plastic barrier separating the parts of the kitchen under construction. Although concerned, Meléndez said he decided to keep the restaurant open since only 0.04 percent of his customers were reporting an illness. And when Café Mundo finally did close, Meléndez said it was his decision after he invited a health administrator to investigate the problems.

    The owner also cast doubt that his clients were actually sickened by food poisoning, adding that doctors told him there's been a stomach flu epidemic in the country.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: May 11th, 2009 - 2:44pm by Casey Jacob

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that a modest 2,500 people followed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Twitter feed, CDCEmergency, when it was launched during the outbreak of Salmonella linked to Peanut Corp. of America products earlier this year. Now that the CDC is tweeting about the H1N1 flu (aka swine flu), over 100,000 members of the interested public are following.

    In addition to the Twitter feed, CDC’s National Center for Health Marketing has responded to public demand for information with a Flickr photo stream, podcasts, videos and a Facebook page. These are the media familiar to today’s consumers.

    The director of the National Center for Health Marketing, Dr. Jay Bernhardt, explained that the effectiveness of the agency’s communications through these media is dependent upon public trust, which is developed by speaking the audience’s language.

    For example, Berhardt said of the CDC’s Tweets, “The social media team has learned to use a lot of exclamation points in these kinds of things.”

    This lit review that I’ve been working on is full of evidence of the effectiveness of communicators that target an audience and then reach out to them with relevant, reliable, rapid and repeated information through the media they use every day.

    The review also supports the evaluation of communication efforts to determine their effectiveness (and make changes, if necessary).

    Polls by the Harvard School of Public Health have attempted to evaluate the effectiveness of the CDC’s efforts. And while direct observation of actual consumer behaviors would provide a more accurate evaluation, results of the consumer polls have been promising:

    “[T]he poll shows that 67% of Americans are now washing their hands or using sanitizers more often, compared with 59% who said the same thing a week ago,” stated a report by MedPage.

    “61% of respondents said they were not concerned that they or a family member would get the H1N1 flu within the next year. That's up from 53% who weren't worried a week ago.”


    People can handle more information—not less—about the risks in their lives. Kudos to CDC.
     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: February 24th, 2009 - 1:14am by Michelle Mazur

    Do you remember how you first heard about the latest round of Salmonella in the peanut butter?  Was it on the evening news, in the paper, or did you hear about it through Facebook or Twitter?  If you’re in the under 30 crowd you might fit into the latter category.  Social networking sites, like Facebook, Twitter and MySpace are increasingly being utilized for up-to-the-minute recall information.

    During the recent Salmonella outbreak, the United States Department of Health and Human Services - specifically the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - engaged in a heavy social media push to inform citizens about the health risks and product recalls.  As a result, the CDC Social Media Center was created as a central hub for harnessing the power of social networking to spread recall information.

    Twitter is one of the sites currently used in the assortment of links.   Twitter allows users to “follow” one another’s “tweets” about what they do during the day.  The website is on the rise among medical professionals and there are accounts for all ranges of industry available.  Why not food safety?

    Federal health agencies have been experimenting with new Internet tools, dubbed Web 2.0, that make it easier to deliver information directly to the public. The "Health 2.0" movement got a big boost with the arrival of President Barack Obama, who is pushing federal agencies to use the tools to make the federal government more transparent and participatory.

    Current news about FDA recalls can be found @FDArecalls and public health updates from the CDC can be found @CDCemergency. The only snag is you have to sign up in order to receive tweets from the FDA, but hey, its free.  After all, you’re no one if you’re not on Twitter.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share