“Fruits and vegetables are an important part of a healthy eating plan, and should fill half of your plate, but just like any food product, extra precautions should be taken to reduce the risk of food poisoning,” said Sarah Krieger, a registered dietitian and academy spokeswoman, in a statement.
She said (among other things -ben):
- Buy loose produce rather than pre-packaged, but if you do buy packaged lettuce or carrots or other items, wash them even if they say “ready to eat.”
I'd like to see what data The Academy has that shows this recommendation would result in risk-reduction.
Washing pre-washed leafy greens in the home isn't going to accomplish further risk-reduction than what was applied at processing; tight attachment or internalization of the target pathogens are likely for whatever is left when it gets to someones kitchen.
A review paper published in Food Protection Trends in 2007 contained guidelines developed by a national panel of food safety folks and concluded:
"… leafy green salad in sealed bags labeled ‘washed’ or ‘ready-to-eat’ that are produced in a facility inspected by a regulatory authority and operated under cGMPs, does not need additional washing at the time of use unless specifically directed on the label.”
The panel also advised that additional washing of ready-to-eat green salads is not likely to enhance safety.
“The risk of cross contamination from food handlers and food contact surfaces used during washing may outweigh any safety benefit that further washing may confer."
A table of leafy green-related outbreak is available at http://bites.ksu.edu/leafy-greens-related-outbreaks. I'm not sure there's any data out there that shows washing would have been a protective step for any of the outbreaks.
The merits of washing produce at home are debatable - many papers show somewhere around a 1-log reduction of pathogens from washing produce with no difference whether the fruit or vegetable was washed with water or some sort of sanitizer. A ten-fold reduction is okay if there isn’t much pre-home contamination, but washing as a kill step sucks and is really more about increasing quality(removing grit). Effective risk reduction actions for fresh produce are more likely found in production, processing and food service preparation (where contamination often occurs) – not in home kitchens.
Today I spent a couple of hours with some new family and consumer science extension agents talking about the history of food safety, how risk is calculated and how messages should be based on data - not conjecture. We talked about why the FDA model food code provides guidance on a specific water temperature for handwashing (100F/38C). It's mainly because folks might be more likely to wash hands when water is warm (except no one can point to that in the literature), that fat is more soluble and soap lathers better. But some research has shown that temperature isn't a factor in pathogen removal at all (which is the desired outcome of the action).
One of the agents asked me how something like that gets into and stays in a regulatory document and I responded by saying "It probably seemed like a good idea to someone, and it stuck."
I feel the same way about the discussion about the safety of reusable bags.
The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics has put out a press release saying that reusable bags need to be washed regularly by users as pathogens grow well and cross-contamination is likely.
From the release:
Reusable grocery totes are a popular, eco-friendly choice to transport groceries, but only 15 percent of Americans regularly wash their bags, creating a breeding zone for harmful bacteria, according to a survey by the Home Food Safety program, a collaboration between the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (formerly the American Dietetic Association) and ConAgra Foods.
“Cross-contamination occurs when juices from raw meats or germs from unclean objects come in contact with cooked or ready-to-eat foods like breads or produce,” says registered dietitian and Academy spokesperson Ruth Frechman. “Unwashed grocery bags are lingering with bacteria which can easily contaminate your foods.”
Sort of.
Williams and colleagues (2011) have published the only peer-reviewed study on the microbial safety of reusable bags and tested growth of Salmonella in 2 batches. They spiked the bags with 10^6 cfu and let them sit in the trunk of a car for 2 hours. One of the batches, where the temperature reached 47C/117F, showed a one-log increase in the Salmonella. The other batch, where the temperature reached 53C/124F, there was a one-log reduction. That data doesn't show just a breeding zone - it shows they can be a killing zone too (and I'm not sure how realistic a 10^6 contamination really is).
The part of the press releases that is the least rooted in science is that pathogen-containing bags "easily contaminate your foods." The same Williams study showed generic E. coli is floating around in bags, recoverable in 12 % (n=58) of those tested but can it be (or is it likely) to be transferred to any ready-to-eat foods, or somehow to food contact surfaces in the home?
Just because the bacteria might be there, doesn't mean it can contaminate a ready-to-eat food. No one has presented data to support that. Maybe the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics - if so, they should share it.
In a cross-contamination event there is a dilution effect when it comes to transfer. 1000 cfus of Campylobacter on the outside of the package of raw chicken might become 100 cfus when transferred to the bag, and then only 10 cfus when transferred to ready-to-eat apples.
Washing bags frequently (as the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics suggests) is probably a good idea (like washing hands in warm water) and probably won't increase risk, but I wonder how much it decreases the probability of cross-contamination when compared to doing nothing.
.jpg)
