Syndicate content Latest Update: 09/06/10, 01:38 PM
  • Posted: July 23rd, 2010 - 6:27pm by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    Last year renwoned New York Times food dude Mark Bittman posted a recipe for a botulism surprise (disguised as a garlic-in-oil product) that was ammended after a few letters about safety. Today, one of Bittman's colleagues and contributors to his blog, Kerri Conan writes about a way to make "quick pickles" apparently the wrong way.

    According to Conan, to make the skillet pickles:

    Start with trimmed whole or sliced vegetables (in this case green beans but I later made a batch with beets) and a hot skillet filmed with olive oil. Add some aromatics (the first garlic from the garden for the first; the other got a mixture of sesame and grape seed oils with scallions). When the seasoning just starts to sputter, toss in the veg. Move them around in the pan a bit so the color brightens evenly, then stir in a splash each of water and vinegar (I used sherry v. for the beans and rice v. for the beets, but your call).

    Bring the whole lot to a boil and cook until the vegetables are about two clicks less tender than you eventually want them. Remove the pan from the heat to cool. Empty everything into a jar and chill, shaking the contents often. Polish them off in a few days.

    Conan's recipe sounds a bit more like a salad, but included in this post (unlike Mark's last year) is the addition of a refrigeration step for preserving the product, and the mention of eating it within a couple of days. Chilling is a good tip, green beans with the addition of a "splash" of vinegar with a bunch of oil left on the counter for a few days could result in a serious public health issue. The pathogen of concern, Clostridium botulinum, could exist as spores on the suggested ingredients. Heating the foods may activate the spores and placing the flavor-making components into certain oils can create the perfect environment (oxygen-free and low acid) for cell growth and botulinum toxin formation.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
    Other Microorganisms  |  0 Comments
    None
  • Posted: July 23rd, 2010 - 7:58am by Doug Powell

    In the interest of open and transparent discussion, Ontario public health types are asking the public to sit quietly and obey food safety rules because they are the critical control point when it comes to raw, frozen chicken thingies.

    Dr. Vera Etches, associate medical officer of health with.Ottawa Public Health (OPH, that’s in Canada) said,

    "Since the first of June, 23 cases of salmonella have been reported to OPH, almost double the number of cases typically seen this time of year. A significant number of these cases appear to be related to undercooked or inappropriately stored processed chicken products."

    OPH is reminding residents to use safe food handling and cooking practices when preparing all food, and specifically, processed chicken products such as chicken strips, nuggets and burgers.

    I’m waiting for the day when a public health type will stop blaming consumers and ask the industry, why is their salmonella in your frozen, cooked product, and stop selling raw and cooked product side-by-side because they look the same.

     

    Your rating: None (5 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 23rd, 2010 - 7:43am by Doug Powell

    A new state law in South Dakota has state regulators adding new requirements to help ensure safety at local farmers markets.

    After taking effect July 1, local food vendors that work out of their home kitchens and not commercial kitchens will now have to label their products with ingredients, contact information and submit their recipes for testing to help ensure better safety.

    State Representative Jacqueline Sly, R-Rapid City, the prime sponsor of the bill that became law, said,

    "In this day in age with looking at food safety and allergies, we want to protect producers and consumers. I know it's a little more work, but in the long run it would be worth it if there were people who got sick."

    Joan Hegerfeld-Baker, an Extension food safety specialist in Brookings, said,

    "There are a lot of people who really haven't learned properly. There are shortcuts people are starting to use that are not safe. You want people to use safe, tested methods."

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
    None  |  0 Comments
    farmers', food safety, markets, south dakota
  • Posted: July 23rd, 2010 - 7:28am by Doug Powell

    The sickies stepping forward now number 18 and the Public Health Agency of Canada says people shouldn’t eat Freybe brand headcheese produced by G. Brandt Meat Packers in Mississauga, Ont.

    The headcheese was distributed nationally by Freybe Gourmet Foods Ltd., but it is sliced and packaged at deli counters in various stores so consumers may not be aware of the brand they bought.

    How can anyone consider headcheese a gourmet food?
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 22nd, 2010 - 10:02pm by Doug Powell

    We often host drum circles out on the large lawn where we beat on large animal hides and get into touch with our inner obscure jazz that NPR helps us find. Or Phish live albums.

    Or not.

    On December 24, 2009, a woman aged 24 years from New Hampshire was confirmed to have gastrointestinal anthrax on the basis of clinical findings and a Bacillus anthracis blood culture isolate. Her symptoms began on December 5.

    One day before symptom onset, she had participated in a drumming event at a community organization's building where animal-hide drums of multiple ages and origins were played. This report describes the case and subsequent investigation, which identified 84 persons potentially exposed to anthrax, including those persons at the drumming event and those who lived or worked at the event site. Review of New Hampshire disease surveillance data and clinical microbiology records for periods before and after the event identified no additional anthrax cases. Initial qualitative environmental testing of the event site yielded three positive samples (two from drum heads and one composite sample of three electrical outlets in the main drumming room). Wider, targeted, semi-quantitative environmental testing of the site and additional drums yielded six positive samples (two from one drum and four from environmental locations in the building).

    These results suggested that aerosolization of spores from drumheads had occurred. All isolates obtained from environmental and drum samples matched the patient's isolate by multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis using eight loci (MLVA-8). Public health agencies and persons with exposure to animal-hide drums should be aware of the potential, although remote, risk for anthrax exposure associated with these drums.

    A total of 72 persons attended the December 4 event, and a total of 59 drums were present, including 17 drums that participants brought from home. Volunteers set up drums and prepared a vegetarian meal; participants ate dinner in the main drumming room (Figure) before beginning the drumming circle, which lasted 2 hours.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 22nd, 2010 - 5:59pm by Sol Erdozain

    Author: 
    Sol Erdozain

    I like having a glass of wine with my dinner every now and then. It tastes good and they say it’s good for you, so I don’t even have to feel guilty about it.

    Apparently, a group of farmers in British Columbia think the health benefits also apply to cattle. The idea is a variation of the Kobe beef, where cattle are fed beer. Unlike Kobe beef, the wine is not fed every day.

    “It’s during the final 90 days leading up to their slaughter that they are fed red wine supplied by a number of wineries in the Okanagan Valley.”

    The final product is sweeter-tasting meat that is supposedly more tender. Plus, the cows get to die buzzed.

    I wonder, if they did this with dairy cows, would wine and cheese parties become obsolete?

     

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
    Animals  |  0 Comments
    Happy Cows, Wine
  • Posted: July 22nd, 2010 - 12:16pm by Doug Powell

    Academic publishing is like the Tina Fey flick, Mean Girls. Reviewers are catty, bitchy, and snarly, all because the nerds are in power and can hide behind the cloak of anonymity.

    For some reason, I usually get called in to review lousy papers, probably because I have no hesitation saying, ‘this work sucks; I could write a better paper with my butt cheeks’ or something like that.

    There are so many bad papers out there.

    Some geniuses at Health Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency decided that after 23 people died of listeria in Maple Leaf cold colds in 2008, rather than write a paper about all the mistakes that were made, they would write a paper entitled, Changing Regulation: Canada’s New Thinking on Listeria.

    I have a problem with anyone who says they speak on behalf of all Canadian women, or Canadians, or other groups. Industry, don’t pay attention to this – go above and beyond because you’re going to lose money when the outbreak happens, not the bureaucrats.

    The Health Canada and CFIA types proudly proclaim they’d never heard of listeria in Sara Lee hot dogs in 1998, or any other outbreak, until it happened in Canada. Now the government types have introduced what they call enhanced testing requirements.

    The authors find it necessary to say that,

    “Consumers also have an important role to play in the farm-to-fork continuum. That role calls for Canadians to learn and adopt safe food handling, avoidance of certain high-risk foods, and preparation practices. To this effect, Health Canada has and will continue to undertake the development of science-based consumer education material which will help create an understanding of food safety issues within the context of the public’s right to know about the potential dangers in food, and industry’s responsibility for producing a safe food. A combination of all these approaches are currently being adopted and/or developed to improve the control of L. monocytogenes in RTE foods sold in Canada.”

    Wow. Guess it was the consumers’ fault that 23 died from eating crappy Maple Leaf deli meat. Or the dieticians at the aged home facilities who though it would be a bright idea to serve unheated cold-cuts to immunocomprimised old people.

    This is Health Canada, the agency that still recommends whole poultry be cooked to 180F, while the U.S. recommends 165F. Are the laws of physics somehow different north of the 49th parallel? We’ve asked, and no one at Health Canada will explain, So why should they be believed on anything else?

    And instead of writing crappy papers about collaborations devoid of fact, why isn’t Health Canada and the food safety types at CFIA cracking down on the BS emanating from Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Kids, which says that cold-cuts are fine for expectant moms despite a treasure-trove of scientific evidence to the contrary.

    The paper concludes,

    “We feel that we have learned valuable lessons from the Maple Leaf listeriosis outbreak, which occurred in 2008. We have used these lessons to help us develop CFIA Directives for federally registered meat and poultry plants. We are also learning from industry and we will use their “Best Practices” document to further develop our policies on Listeria control. By all parties working together in a non-competitive and trusting manner, we feel that we can make great strides in Listeria control and continue along a path to reducing the burden of foodborne listeriosis in Canada.”

    OMG This made it into a scientific paper? I feel lots of things, but I don’t ’write them in journal articles. Here’s some tips. None of which were discussed in the so-called scientific paper:

    • put warning labels on cold-cuts and other high-risk foods for expectant moms
    • make listeria testing results public
    • make food safety training mandatory (and then we’ll work on making it better).

    And the paper is below, with the catty comments from reviewers.

    I could write a better paper with my butt cheeks.
    sites/default/files/Farber et al 2010_listeria.pdf

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 22nd, 2010 - 10:57am by Ben Chapman

    Author: 
    Ben Chapman

    At pretty well every conference or meeting I went to in 2008 and 2009 I was given a reusable grocery bag. A decent registration gift to hold programs, promotional materials and goodies – that served some post-meeting utility as well. Not a bad replacement for the laptop bags that were ubiquitous in the five years before. Lately meeting organizers have been giving out aluminum water bottles, another usable item. We’ve collected 6 or 7 reusable grocery bags and they are now in rotation for our weekly shops. 

    A couple of weeks ago a press release about a study looking at the handling and microbiological content of a select group of bags was released.  What I wrote then was:

    The study, when and if it is published will provide some nice baseline results on what people say they do, demonstrates the effect of washing, and doesn’t like some try to point out really say that plastic bags are any safer (there was no comparison) but there are a couple of things missing that could really have been useful. Two big questions still need to be answered:

    - Generic E. coli is floating around in bags, recoverable in the Gerba study in 12 % of those tested, but can it be (or is it likely) to be transferred to any ready-to-eat foods, or somehow to food contact surfaces in the home?

    - What effect does drying have on the bags, if at any? According to Gerba et al., washing works, no one reports doing it; but what about flipping them inside out and drying bags for a few days after use?

    After that post, a local TV station called about the study and conclusions and wanted to know a bit more about potential risks what people could do in their homes to reduce the chance of foodborne illness. My tips were what we do in our house: Wrap raw meats in a secondary plastic bag to create a barrier and catch any dripping juices; washing our bags every couple of weeks to remove anything that might be floating around and dedicating a reusauable bag as the “meat bag” and washing it more often, usually after every shop.
     

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
    Food Safety Culture  |  1 Comment
    None
  • Posted: July 22nd, 2010 - 9:19am by Doug Powell

    No, I wouldn’t. Wives are to be cherished, not treated like cows. I have five daughters and they were all breast-fed.

    Breast milk is for babies, not food porn.

    Daniel Angerer disagrees.

    Gael Greene reported back in March how Angerer (sounds like a name Stephen Colbert made up) was serving customers cheese made from his wife’s breast milk.

    Although the New York Health Department forbade the sale of Angerer’s breasty cheese, Greene secured and sampled some of the wares.

    “Surprise. It’s not the flavor that shocks me—indeed, it is quite bland, slightly sweet, the mild taste overwhelmed by the accompanying apricot preserves and a sprinkle of paprika. It’s the unexpected texture that’s so off-putting. Strangely soft, bouncy, like panna cotta.”
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 22nd, 2010 - 7:53am by Doug Powell

    America isn’t France, but increasingly dogs are allowed to join folks for a public meal.

    Sharon Peters writes in today’s The USA Today that across America, an ever-growing number of eating establishments, many of them high-end, are opening their patios to diners who want to share their eating-out experience with their pets.

    Art Smith, owner/chef of the chic Art and Soul restaurant on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C, which draws scores of Washingtonians to its canine-welcoming patio every week, says,

    "To appreciate food and life is to appreciate animals, too.”

    In canine-crazy Carmel, Calif., many restaurants have pup-friendly patios, including Bahama Billy's Island Steakhouse, where the 16 patio tables are often jam-packed with patrons with pooches.

    There are never any outbursts of canine bad behavior, says co-owner Sylvia Sharp. The dogs "seem to view (the patio) as neutral territory, kind of like Switzerland."

    At trendy downtown eatery Nosh in Colorado Springs, the massive patio — in the shadow of Pike's Peak — becomes a veritable playground for dogs and owners every summer Sunday. Plastic kiddie pools are filled with water, tables are arranged to maximize romp-around room, and off-leash dogs frolic dog-park style, sniffing up each other (and the humans), sampling treats from the bags of doggie goodies presented free to each diner accompanied by a dog, and coaxing each other into splash-fests.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 22nd, 2010 - 7:21am by Doug Powell

    When someone says Australian boarding school, all I can think of is the highlarious television show, Summer Heights High.

    Some researchers from Canberra report in the current issue of Foodborne Pathogens and Disease about an outbreak of Campylobacter jejuni gastroenteritis at an Australian boarding school.

    Thirty-five cases of gastroenteritis were recorded among 58 questionnaire respondents, with 14 of 18 persons submitting fecal samples having confirmed C. jejuni infections. Attendance at one evening meal was statistically associated with illness (ratio of proportions of 3.09; 95% confidence intervals: 1.21, 14.09; p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant association between any single food provided at the implicated evening meal and illness, suggesting that the potential cause of the outbreak was a cross-contamination event.

    The study highlights the potential of cross-contamination as a cause of epidemic campylobacteriosis. The application of molecular techniques to aid epidemiological investigation of recognized C. jejuni outbreaks is illustrated.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 21st, 2010 - 8:40pm by Doug Powell

    Food poisoning has apparently caused the postponement of Elton John's scheduled concert at Tucson Arena.

    The Arizona Daily Star reports that Wednesday night's show was nearly sold out with about 8,800 tickets purchased. Organizers say the British rocker will perform Thursday night instead.

    A spokeswoman for the Tucson concert venue says John apologizes for the inconvenience caused by his illness, but doctors say he will be fine to take the stage Thursday.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 21st, 2010 - 1:13pm by Doug Powell

    The TV chef who Gordon Ramsey once called a Teletubby, Antony Worrall Thompson, blames bureaucrats for the one-star-out-of-five for hygiene at his Oxfordshire gastro pub.

    Worrall Thompson said failing to fill out "bits of paper" led to the low score at The Greyhound, in Henley-on-Thames.

    Worrall Thompson admitted food had been found beneath his fridge and oven during the inspection, but that people would need to be on their "hands and knees with a torch" to find it, adding,

    "All [the public] want to know is if they're going to be poisoned. The public don't care if the paperwork isn't done. It's treating everyone as if they haven't got a brain. It's got absurd, the amount of paperwork you have to do. There's this inbuilt hatred between Environmental Health Officers and chefs. We should be working together."

    Council cabinet member for health, Dorothy Brown, said,

    "Mr Worrall Thompson is mistaken that our Scores on the Doors scheme is overly bureaucratic and driven by paperwork, when it is in fact driven by the need to improve food hygiene standards.”

    Worrall Thompson has shown up in barfblog.com before. He was a signatory to a open letter calling on the British public to ask where their food comes from (from under the fridge?), he published a recipe in Healthy & Organic Living that included a toxic plant as an ingredient, and has run afoul of public health types for using paving stones as a kitchen counter at a public BBQ.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 21st, 2010 - 12:25pm by Doug Powell

    island.style_.bbq_.vegas_.jpg

    Thanks to a barfblog.com reader who submitted this news clip from Las Vegas KTNV

    Island Style BBQ on Durango near Flamingo has a sign hanging on their wall with an A rating by the Southern Nevada Health District, but before they had the allstar grade, they earned an F.

    They received 49 demerits when the health district came in, shutting them down. The inspection report noted no soap or paper towels near the sinks, shellfish stored unmarked in a plastic bag and dried-up, crusted food debris caking the slicer.

    The report also noted a major cockroach infestation. Inspectors say they moved a box and cockroaches went in all directions.

    A word that kept popping up in the report was dirty. There were dirty cloths on cutting boards, floors and walls were dirty and all food equipment was dirty. Utensils, food containers, pans and racks were all noted as dirty.

    The restaurant had been reinspected and reopened after that negative report. Contact 13 went to the restaurant looking for some answers. They weren't open during normal business hours.

    An employee unlocked the door and told us the owner wasn't there either. Contact 13 tried giving her a call. She didn't answer and didn't accept voicemails. The owner says as of the end of the month, the open sign will remain off as Island Style BBQ is closing its doors, for good.

    This isn't the first time Island BBQ has been shutdown by the health district. They've been closed twice before for too many demerits, once last year and once in 2008. Both times they were reinspected and received an A grade.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 21st, 2010 - 8:05am by Doug Powell

    Chef Jonathan Benno visited a farm recently, a crucial stop in his yearlong quest to open a $20-million restaurant at Lincoln Center in September.

    In a standard food porn piece, The New York Times reports this morning that once, farmers begged top chefs to give their produce a whirl. But with carrots, corn and tomatoes being accorded the fanatical attention once reserved for foie gras and truffles, chefs now come knocking.

    Mr. Benno, 40, said,

    “It’s not enough now to pick up the phone and say to a distributor: ‘What have you got? O.K., give me a case.’ Now you want to see. You want to go there. They get to know us, and they see the possibilities for us. And for them.”

    Michael White, the chef and an owner of Marea, along with Alto and Convivio, all in Manhattan, said, “Our customers travel to food and wine festivals and food devotees are more and more aware of the sourcing of products.” At the table, they can even surf the Web on their iPhones to check out the provenance of the steak, the chicken and the chicory.

    Benno was further quoted as saying,

    “This is not about currying favor, it is about developing a relationship. In this business, it’s about the handshake — looking them in the eye.”

    Look your farmer in the eye and ask what water he or she irrigated with as the crops were withering and about to die (that was my farmer, left, 10 years ago, and he engaged in frank food safety discussions). Ask about the microbial tests done on water and soil. Ask about the hand sanitation for workers in the field and in the packing shed. Trust, but verify.

    Less food porn, more food safety.
     

    Your rating: None (4 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 21st, 2010 - 7:42am by Doug Powell

    News accounts of organic agriculture and organic food are more likely to be positive than negative and inaccurately claim organic food is safer, according to Kansas State University's Doug Powell.

    Powell, an associate professor of food safety, is the co-author of "Coverage of organic agriculture in North American newspapers: Media -- linking food safety, the environment, human health and organic agriculture," just published in the British Food Journal.

    The paper is based on a study Powell conducted from 1999-2004 with two colleagues at the University of Guelph in Canada, Stacey Cahill and Katija Morley. Cahill was one of Powell's students at the time.

    The team explored how topics of organic food and agriculture were discussed in five North American newspapers. Using the content analysis technique, the 618 articles collected were analyzed for topic, tone and theme regarding food safety, environmental concerns and human health.

    The prominent topics of the articles were genetic engineering, pesticides and organic farming, Powell said.

    The analysis found 41.4 percent of the articles had a neutral tone toward organic agriculture and food, 36.9 percent had a positive tone, 15.5 percent were mixed and 6.1 percent were negative, Powell said.

    "We concluded that articles about organic production in the selected time period were seldom negative," he said. "Organic agriculture was often portrayed in the media as an alternative to allegedly unsafe and environmentally damaging modern agriculture practices. That means organic was being defined by what it isn't, rather than what it is."

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture has repeatedly stated that the organic standard is a verification of production methods and not a food safety claim, Powell said.

    "Food safety was the least important in the media discussion of organic agriculture," Powell said. "The finding that 50 percent of food safety-themed statements in news articles were positive with respect to organic agriculture, while 81 percent of health-themed statements and 90 percent of environment-themed statements were positive toward organic food, indicates an uncritical press."
    Analysis of articles over time, among media outlets and by topic, allows for understanding of media reporting on the subject and provides insight into the way the public is influenced by news coverage of organic food and agriculture, Powell said.

    The article is available at:
    http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1871116&show=abstract.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 20th, 2010 - 9:34pm by Sol Erdozain

    Author: 
    Sol Erdozain

    Lindsay Lohan has been making headlines lately for the whole drunk driving and defying court thing. I miss the good old “Mean Girls” days. She looked so innocent at the beginning of that movie, when the only place she felt safe eating at was in the toilet stall.

    Maybe she was on to something.

    "There's more faecal bacteria in your kitchen sink than in your toilet after you flush it. People nuke their bathrooms, but not their kitchens."

    The research, from the University of Arizona, also points out that the toilet is also cleaner than cutting boards in the kitchen, computer keyboards in the office and workplaces where there are children.

    Ok, so maybe Lindsay did it because it was in the script and it’s not exactly a trend to follow in dining, but the point is sanitation.

    Clean kitchen surfaces, use a separate cutting board for meat and wash your and your kids’ hands.
     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 20th, 2010 - 6:19pm by Sol Erdozain

    Author: 
    Sol Erdozain

    A friend of mine works for a company in charge of collecting waste oil from restaurants to later turn it into fuel. They also pick up road kill from I-70. It’s a dirty job, but I’m glad somebody is doing it.

    The Chinese have taken recycling to a whole new level. The waste oil is “skimmed from kitchen waste” and resold in the black market. The yuck factor is enough reason in itself to blog about, but the practice is also a dangerous one:

    “Reused cooking oil would likely contain acrylamide, a chemical that forms naturally when starchy foods are baked or fried. Studies have shown the chemical, which also has industrial uses, causes cancer in lab animals and nerve damage to workers who are exposed to high levels.”

    Chinese officials say they are stepping up their efforts to combat this and other food safety issues.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 20th, 2010 - 6:07pm by Doug Powell

    Terri Waller, a Master of Public Administration student at Troy University and a certified food safety manager and instructor, writes in this guest blog that,

    My grandfather, James Davis, always addressed an issue immediately. All bad habits in our house were addressed and put to rest. Food safety managers should do the same -- immediately correcting a bad habit will have a positive affect on establishments, scores, and the community in which they serve.

    Being a food safety professional, I see almost daily, educated food service managers fail to implement proper food safety concepts. This failure is associated with the culture of the establishment. If the culture of an establishment has always been to perform a task incorrectly or not at all, it is embedded into the DNA of that organization.

    Food safety professionals must get in the habit of protecting the community from foodborne illness. I agree with Edgar Schein, social psychologist, that managers must embed correct shared values and assumptions in the organization’s culture and reinforce them in new and current members if they are to create and sustain strong cultures in their organizations (Tompkins, 2005, pg. 366).

    “Organizations are not simple systems like machines or adaptive organisms; they are human systems manifesting complex patterns of cultural activity (Tompkins, 2005, pg. 361).”

    Organizations are seen as extended families or clans held together by shared values and beliefs. These values and beliefs are established over time as organizations struggle with the usual problems of internal integration and external adaptation. Sometimes they are introduced into the culture by organizational founders or dynamic leaders. At other times they enter the culture unconsciously as members learn how to cope successfully with problems. Over time, these values and beliefs become embodied in myths and rituals that allow the shared culture to be internalized and transmitted from one generation to the next. Once these values and beliefs are firmly established in the dominant culture, they guide the daily decisions of organizational members and provide the glue that holds the organization together. (Tompkins, 2005, pg. 361)

    “The strength of a culture is best defined in terms of the homogeneity and stability of group membership and the length and intensity of shared experience (Tompkins, 2005, pg. 365).”

    As a manager if you see something wrong correct it. Correcting bad habits notifies present employees of what was wrong and how it should be made right. This way everyone moves forward on the right foot. When things are implemented right in an organization it is easy for new members to come on board knowing what to do and the right way to do it.


    Resource:
    Tompkins, J. (2005). Organization Theory and Public Management. Boston, MA,
    Wadsworth.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: July 20th, 2010 - 1:37pm by Doug Powell

    Karen Morrisroe almost died from E. coli O157 last year.

    She says U.K. E. coli rates are "disgusting."

    The 33-year-old from Wrexham, contracted the bug in July 2009, 10 weeks after giving birth, and spent five weeks on "death's door" in a coma, after an outbreak was linked to a chip shop in Llay, which was still under investigation.
     

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
    None  |  0 Comments
    Coma, e. coli O157, Karen Morrisroe, Uk