Jittering jingoism

Posted: August 20th, 2007 - 6:33am by Doug Powell

First it was the Brits, now the Kiwis are jumping into the jingoism wars.

AgResearch New Zealand senior microbiologist Guill le Roux was quoted as telling the Waikato Times, "Eat it (meat) and enjoy it; we have the safest meat in the world. But for goodness sake, prepare and cook it properly."

le Roux was further quoted as saying,

"In general, we are better than most other places in the world. In the States, for instance, they use largely untrained Mexican labour, so there's a language problem for a start. They have about 80 per cent staff turnover annually. And they work with very dirty animals, which are kept on feed lots where there's mud and manure, which increases the possibility of disease. … We are lucky here, there is very little risk, even in hamburgers which are notorious overseas. But we can't get complacent, because the goal posts are moving all the time especially in export markets."

The story notes that le Roux gained a certain profile a few years ago when he was reported as saying that New Zealand had the worst incidence of campylobacter in the world, adding, "We were at a conference and everyone else was saying the same thing, but the media focused on me."

He is quick to point out the statement needs clarification. "These bacteria can be found in water and in many food products such as chicken, fruit and vegetables. However, the high reported incidence in New Zealand is probably due to our good reporting systems as much as anything else."

Any country that claims to have the safest food in the world is probably wrong. Only one can be correct. Some data would bolster a claim of safety.
Your rating: None
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Gale Carr says:

I am a former food inspector for the US Army and department of Defense. I now am in the private sector and an EXTREME advocate for food safety and cleanliness. I think so much of the foodborne illness in this country could be avoided with a simple but proper washing. At the same time, I think that people researching and regulating foodborne illnesses should exibit responsibility when talking about this. The chicken little approach of saying the sky is falling (all tomatoes are bad) was damaging to a whole industry and all those who rely on it. Before reporting, they should have localized the true cause. One piece of bad news will far outweigh tons of good press.

Posted on November 24th, 2008 - 5:18pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.