Inspection reflection; is more always better?

Posted: December 21st, 2009 - 9:53am by Ben Chapman

A rat issue in Honolulu's Chinatown market has led to politicians to blame the situation on a shortage of state food safety inspectors and environmental health officers.

Inspectors in the region have dwindled from 23 in 1988 to nine today, causing State Sen. David Ige, chairman of the Health Committee, to state that there is an immediate public health need to beef up the number of inspectors on O'ahu.

Maybe. But it's not as simple as throwing more food referees into the mix.

A couple of years ago, Brae Surgeoner and I interviewed restaurant operators and environmental health officers about their views regarding restaurant inspection. Almost all of the operators suggested that inspection was a good thing, and that they had a good relationship with EHOs.  And that’s when things got fun. Restaurant operators reported to us that what was being seen and recorded wasn't representative of what was really happening with every meal.  They adjusted their personnel and their procedures so they looked good. The best part of the study for us was that the inspectors reported the same thing: they felt they weren’t getting the full picture and knew everyone was on their best behavior while they were around.

More inspectors alone won't solve everything, and it sounds like Hawaii Department of Health's Laurence Lau gets it.

"Any regulatory and public health program would like to have more staff," said Laurence Lau, the department's deputy director of environmental health. "We would do more if we had more. We're just going to do the best we can."

Lau also said even if DOH had more inspectors, they still couldn't be "everywhere all the time" to prevent problems. "The first responsibility remains with the restaurant and the food seller to sell safe food."

The time the auditor/inspector spends in the facility represents an unrealistic snapshot of what actually happens.  Even if multiple inspectors show up to a facility over a period of time to gather more snapshots, what they see will likely be different. What's more important to the health and safety of customers is what happens when the inspectors, or auditors, or the boss, aren’t there.

Your rating: None
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Larry Geller says:

The Honolulu Chinatown situation is different. There are a number of markets in which nany different vendors share a common space. An inspection during the evening is easy to arrange since the landlord can just open the doors one night. If there is a problem, it will be immediately visible. Of course, inspections during the daytime are also possible.The problem now is to make these markets safe. The Hawaii DOH appears to be doing as little as possible. Certainly, no nighttime inspections are planned, nor inspections of any kind in the other markets, as far as has been announced.This one place was caught on video, so the DOH's lack of attention to the markets has been painfully demonstrated. But they are not working on the overall problem. And the vendors are covering up their windows.On the theory that the landlord has some responsibility, it is possible that we can get legislation introduced to require the landlords to conduct some kind of appropriate inspections and take action. There's no reason why the entire burden has to be upon the state.In any case, this is a work in progress. Suggestions would be very welcome, since in the absence of DOH enthusiasm, we ordinary citizens are pretty much on our own.The legislative session in Hawaii starts mid-January. Perhaps something can be done by then.Thank you for taking up this issue.

Posted on December 22nd, 2009 - 8:10pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.