Kevin Smith got kicked off a Southwest airplane for being fat; should pet owners be kicked off for being inconsiderate?

Posted: February 19th, 2010 - 11:04am by Doug Powell

Movie director Kevin Smith, known for the witty and obscene dialogue in movies he’s penned like Clerks, Chasing Amy and Dogma, was deemed a flight risk by a Southwest airlines pilot last weekend and ordered off the plane.

"I know I'm fat, but was Captain Leysath really justified in throwing me off a flight for which I was already seated?" he ranted through his Twitter account to over 1.6 million followers.. "Again: I'm way fat... But I'm not THERE just yet. But if I am, why wait til my bag is up, and I'm seated WITH ARM RESTS DOWN.”

Smith posted this pic of himself (above, right, exactly as shown) puffing out his cheeks and captioned it, "Look how fat I am on your plane! Quick! Throw me off!"

Another emerging issue on airplanes is those travelling with small pets.

An editorial in the current issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal notes that air travel has become increasingly difficult, with tightened security restrictions and a decreased number of services. But now Air Canada is adding to the difficulty by allowing small pets to travel airplane cabins.

Pets can be accommodated comfortably and safely in airplane cargo holds, which is where they belong. Airlines must choose to put the needs of their human passengers first, or be forced to do so.

Flying should not include avoidable health risks, especially, for passengers with allergies to pets. Many people with allergies to animals will have a reaction when they're trapped in an enclosed space, often for hours.

The Canadian Transportation Agency ruled that people allergic to nuts should be considered to have a disability under the Canada Transportation Act and must therefore be accommodated. The agency is now receiving passenger complaints about pets on airplanes and considering whether those with allergies to pets should also be considered as having a disability. Such a finding would force Canadian airlines to safeguard passengers with pet allergies.
 

Your rating: None (3 votes)
Bookmark and Share
Categories: Animals
Tags: Airplane, Allergy, dog, Pets, policy

Comments

Sheila says:

Having worked in the veterinary field for several years I can tell you that pets do not always fly safely and comfortably in cargo. In fact several airlines refuse to fly animals due to the liability. Pets are left with luggage on the tarmac in extreme heat and cold. Some die from the exposure. During long unexpected layovers they may forced to lay in their own waste for hours. There are many cases of damage to the crate and escape,injury or death of the animal inside. There are also cases of intentional abuse and theft of pets flown cargo. A pet that flies as carry on is not subject to these problems. Allergies to pets cause itchy eyes and sniffles, not possible death like nut allergies. They cannot be compared. Take a Benadryl and Kleenex. I'd much rather have a dog or cat curled up under the seat next to me than a 3 year old kicking the seat behind me on a 3 hour flight or the infant who doesn't know how to pop its ears screaming for an entire trip. I'm allergic to kids, they give me Tourette's. What about my rights?

Posted on March 1st, 2010 - 7:29am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.