Hundreds of DC area restaurants violate health codes

Posted: March 12th, 2010 - 12:20pm by Doug Powell

vomit_milk.jpg

All these stories about local health code violations rarely get to the real issues – what is a critical violation, how is it defined, who decides and why is food safety training so apparently ineffective?

Health inspectors nailed at least 1,900 area restaurants and food vendors — including the swanky Palm and Georgia Brown's -- for violations ranging from rat infestations to "slime"-covered water spigots during a three-month period, according to health department records obtained by The Washington Examiner.

Health inspectors in Virginia, Maryland and the District closed at least 116 area food establishments as a result of major health code infractions.

But hundreds of other restaurants were allowed to remain open, despite racking up critical violations such as expired food and preparing dishes with open wounds. All the violations occurred between Nov. 1 and Feb. 1.

A health inspector observed 11 critical health code violations at Gordon Biersch, which tied Georgia Brown's for the most among D.C. restaurants during one inspection.

A hand-written report described one barehanded cook "preparing desserts with cuts/sores on fingers," and said employees were cleaning dining utensils and dishes with dirty rags between servings, and using the same pair of tongs to handle cooked and raw food.

And in Virginia, Alexandria's upscale Brabo by Robert Wiedmaier was cited for 10 critical health code violations during one inspection.

However, Brabo owner and Executive Chef Wiedmaier said the violations -- which included kitchen employees drinking from uncovered containers and handling toasted bread with bare hands -- did not endanger customers' health, and the use of the word "critical" was misleading.

"No one's ever been sick here," he said. "I run clean, professional restaurants, and I pride myself on how people see my kitchens."

How would he know? He wouldn’t.

 

Your rating: None
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Randy Lyons says:

Mr. Powell, In your first paragraph you ask "why is food safety training so apparently ineffective?" I may not be able to completely answer that question, but I believe that I can get the conversation started in the right direction. I have been involved in the foodservice industry for approximately 33 years and have been certified in Food Safety since 1989. I also instruct food safety in my place of employment. Before I go any further, I would like you to know that the next bit of information deals with why food safety training does not work and is not a representation of all the people involved. I know there are some very good and dedicated people who are doing the best they can. I have found that there is a disconnect between the Food Safety Instructor, employers and employees. Each looks at the same issue differently and none will try to understand the other. Food Safety Instructors have a tendency to go into an operation and lay down the law without understanding that some of the things they demand are beyond the ability of the employer to address. The employer in turn dismisses the entire course as unobtainable (instead of just the part they can't do) and the employee gets caught in the middle and ends up dismissing everything. Health Inspectors have their own part to play in this too. The very first certified Food Safety course I took was back in 1989 and I was very fortunate to be taught by a Health Inspector named Bill Hines. The best thing Mr. Hines did, as far as I am concerned, is he told all of us that he understood it would not be possible for all of us to achieve everything he was teaching, but with the knowledge that we would learn, we could go back to our places of employment and look at our operations and achieve what we could and for the items we could not achieve, find a way to get as close to achieving as possible. Because of this little bit of information that Mr. Hines gave to me, I have never had to worry about an inspector coming to my place of work. I know that they will work with me to make my place better, to pass on new information as it is available and sometimes to kick me in the pants when things get missed. Because the people around me see this willingness to work with the inspectors, they in turn take the training seriously. And things do get missed. We all tend to become blind to our surroundings over time. This is the best part of the inspectors visit as far as I am concerned, because my biggest worry is becoming complacent. This is when things go bad. We should all be working together to make food safer, but instead, I see a lot of people drawing lines in the sand. Some say more laws are the best way to go. I disagree. The laws we have do not work because WE will not work together. We should never worry or even care what the law is, because we should be trying to be better at what we do everyday anyways. Until we all start to work together to make things better nothing will change. In your story, the part about bare hands and toast being a critical violation, why would anyone take us seriously with stuff like that. Is there a better way to do it, yes, but the term critical should only be used for things like non-potable water and rotting food. Anyways, those are my thoughts and I hope this can help start a real discussion towards solving the problem.

Posted on March 13th, 2010 - 6:56pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.