Corporate food safety lawyer talks food safety nonsense

Posted: April 20th, 2010 - 8:31pm by Doug Powell

The authors at the blog site, Defending Food Safety, need a lesson in microbiology.

One of them, some lawyer, Shawn Stevens, really comes across as a douchebag.

A microbiologically-challenged douchebag.

He runs this Defending Food Safety website, which is full of facts, but the kind not referenced in peer-reviewed journals but in his (and his clients’) mind.

He says in his latest missive that,

“If we are really serious about reducing food-borne (sic) illness, however, such initiatives and regulations are only one part of the overall equation. Much greater progress can likely be achieved – more quickly – if more consumers recognize the importance of properly handling and preparing raw animal foods. If all consumers can be educated to assume raw chicken, meat and eggs carry bacteria that can cause illness, to take additional precautions to avoid cross-contamination, and to cook all raw animal products to a safe temperature, consumers can significantly reduce their risk of becoming ill. In this regard, better “Educated People” will more quickly and readily translate into far more “Healthy People.”

What would Socrates say about the gap between reality and rhetoric for any of these food safety lawyer types? Like most, this dude needs an editor. Consumers don’t want to be educated. But I look forward to Stevens advocating toxic waste handling labels on all raw meat. Big, scary labels. And dangerous microorganisms are present on all raw foods, like potatoes and carrots and cantaloupes, not just animal proteins.

Your rating: None
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Anonymous says:

This lawyer has a point. Great food safety will ultimately come from everyone doing their part. Of course the food processors and businesses need stricter laws and more inspections and enforcement. But we consumers need to do a better job too. Cook your hamburger and chicken until its cooked. That is not asking too much from consumers....I already do it and don't have a problem with it. I'm just watching out for myself.

Posted on April 23rd, 2010 - 3:56pm

Joel says:

I'm sorry, but I too agree with the "douchebag lawyer." I learned in fifth grade that food had to be properly cooked to be safely consumed. It seems to me that educating people on ways in which to best ensure they don't become ill is a good idea. I went to his site and it was very balanced and informative. I realize that there are companies doing horrible things but as an educated consumer I can make the choice not to purchase product from companies that have poor safety records. What's more, referring to someone as a "douchebag," "microbiological douchebag", or even "dude" is both sophomoric and unprofessional. It's disappointing that an academic/university professor would devolve to name-calling. Such rhetoric, especially when vulgar, and unsubstantiated, does nothing to further the food safety debate.

Posted on April 30th, 2010 - 12:07am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.