Food safety auditors can suck: Salmonella-in-egg producer got A-OK from same auditor that OKed salmonella in peanut paste

Posted: September 23rd, 2010 - 3:04pm by Doug Powell

The same third-party auditor that approved salmonella-tainted peanut paste that killed nine and sickened 600 also gave DeCoster egg operations a “superior” rating and “recognition of achievement” in June 2010, just as thousands of Americans began barfing from salmonella in DeCoster eggs.

Beyond the theatre of yesterday’s House hearing about the salmonella-in-eggs outbreak that has sickened well over 1,600 was the revelation that DeCoster’s Iowa egg operations had been audited by the American Institute of Baking based in Manhattan (Kansas).

The N.Y. Times reports that documents released by the committee showed that Wright County Egg achieved a “superior” rating and “recognition of achievement” from AIB International, a private inspection company based in Manhattan, Kan., after a June inspection of its processing facility. That came just as the company was causing thousands of illnesses from contaminated eggs.

In 2008, AIB gave a “superior” rating to a Peanut Corporation of America plant in Blakely, Ga., that was later found to be riddled with salmonella that caused a nationwide outbreak and the largest food recall in American history. A spokesman for AIB could not be reached.

Elizabeth Weise of USA Today reported today that Wright County Egg, one of the Iowa farms at the center of this summer's recall of 550 million eggs, earned "superior" ratings for its facilities from a third-party auditor the past three years.

But the auditor was the same one that gave a superior rating to the Peanut Corp. of America, whose shipments were linked to a salmonella outbreak that sickened hundreds a few years ago.

AIB International, of Manhattan, Kan., audited Wright's egg-packing plant twice in 2008, four times in 2009 and at least once in 2010, and every time found it to be "superior," Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., said during the hearing. … Calls to AIB were not returned Wednesday.

AIB International also gave the Peanut Corp. of America's Plainview, Texas, plant a "superior" rating. An outbreak of salmonella linked to some peanut products shipped from that plant and another PCA plant in 2007 and 2008 sickened as many as 600 people and may have contributed to nine deaths.

This is beyond embarrassing. It’s criminal.

A Kansas State student wrote in 2009 that after a March 6, 2009 article in the N.Y. Times sorta shattered the myth of third-party food safety audits, he couldn’t get anyone at AIB to talk.

Since the release of the Times article, AIB now requires a minimum of two days or longer to complete an inspection at a food processing facility. AIB has also announced it will change the name of its Good Manufacturing Practices inspection certificates from “Certificate of Achievement” to “Recognition of Achievement.”

Is that like Homer Simpson winning the First Annual Montgomery Burns Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence?

Apparently, the answer is yes, given the salmonella-in-eggs poopfest.

Third-party food audits, like restaurant inspection, are a snapshot in time. Given the international sourcing of ingredients, audits are a requirement, but so is internal food safety intelligence to make sense of audits that are useful and audits that are chicken poop.

The third-party food safety audit scheme that processors and retailers insisted upon is no better than a financial Ponzi scheme. The vast number of facilities and suppliers means audits are required, but people have been replaced by paper.

Audits, inspections, training and systems are no substitute for developing a strong food safety culture, farm-to-fork, and marketing food safety directly to consumers rather than the local/natural/organic hucksterism is a way to further reinforce the food safety culture.

After the salmonella-in-peanut paste crap, Costco, a retail store, which previously limited AIB’s inspections to its bakery vendors, has now instructed suppliers to not use AIB at all.

“The American Institute of Baking is bakery experts,” said R. Craig Wilson, the top safety official at Costco. “But you stick them in a peanut butter plant or in a beef plant, they are stuffed.”

Or as Mansour Samadpour of Seattle said at the time,

“The contributions of third-party audits to food safety is the same as the contribution of mail-order diploma mills to education.”

Who were the buyers of DeCoster eggs who used AIB audits to justify putting salmonella on grocery store shelves? Any retailers want to step forward?

Coincidentally, Enreco Inc., a maker of flaxseed flours, bragged in a press release yesterday they had earned a “superior" rating from a recent AIB inspection at its Wisconsin production facility.

Enreco president Sean Moriarty said, “We are absolutely pleased to have achieved AIB’s highest rating for four consecutive years now, even while incidents of food product recalls in the last two years have caused AIB to toughen their inspections considerably."

Sean, you may want to rethink that PR.

Your rating: None (6 votes)
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Anonymous says:

It seems to me that considerably more rigorous regulation the third-party certifiers should be a major role of government here. AFAIK, about all the government does now is provide lab procedure standards and certification processes for these. As part of ensuring that proper incentives are in place, is seems to me that jeopardy from harmed parties being legally entitled to compensation from these third party certifiers should be in place if it is not.

Posted on September 24th, 2010 - 10:53am

crs says:

That is just abominable. A meaningless rubberstamp from industrial bedmates. How hollow. And how discouraging for so many reasons.

Posted on September 24th, 2010 - 5:52pm

Anonymous says:

An audit is only as good as the audit instrument. If the audit instrument in the case of an egg production facility has nothing in it about the status of the flocks supplying the eggs, the plant can get a superior rating but the incoming ingredients are contaminated which the egg processing plant does not influence. This is the same in regard to blaming USDA for not turning in Decoster for flies and rodents. USDA has nothing to do with the on-farm production of eggs, just the operation of the processing area.

Posted on September 24th, 2010 - 6:06pm

Cursos Forex says:

AIB now requires a minimum of two days or longer to complete an inspection at a food processing facility...this is very long time, not think you?

Posted on September 26th, 2010 - 5:29am

Anonymous says:

I have worked in the food industry for 17 years, all of which were involved with AIB in some way, shape or form. AIB has their good auditors and their bad auditors, nothing in between. True, what the auditors see is a snap shot but you may have an auditor who bypasses some procedures to save on time. I have faith in a handful of auditors from AIB (I work closely with only about 9) I also have no faith in several. The food industry has become so audit focused that the consistency is lost.

Posted on October 1st, 2010 - 12:24am

Carlos says:

I've worked or received AIB audits for almost 10 years. As some said, there's good and bad auditors but no company can blame them for a safety issue, they are very clear saying the acreditate not certify. For example, they clearly indicate in their reports "at the time the procedure seemed to be ", because they obviously cannot be responsible for the daily production. Systems fail but that's a responsability of each company. Safety audits are an instrument to achieve minimum steps for food safety and to detect and correct the deviations. If you are expecting that an audit assures you food safety, why would the company hired you for????

Posted on November 10th, 2010 - 11:18pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.