Needle or blade tenderized steak continues to raise safety concerns

Posted: November 30th, 2010 - 12:31pm by Doug Powell

It's an important day for food safety types because new research shows E. coli O157:H7 can enter beef cuts like steak during mechanical or blade or needle tenderization, as it’s called.

The idea is that small needles are inserted into steak to inject tenderizers. All hamburger should be cooked to a thermometer-verified 160F because it’s all ground up – the outside, which can be laden with poop, is on the inside. With steaks and roasts, the thought has been that searing on the outside will take care of any poop bugs like E. coli and the inside is clean. But what if needles pushed the E. coli on the outside of the steak to the inside?

Previous work has shown similar results, and the new research in the Journal of Food Safety confirms that E. coli O157:H7 can enter the interior of beef cuts like steaks during the tenderization process. The new work does not assess whether cooking on a grill can kill off the internalized bacteria but does refocus attention on a lingering food safety issue, almost one year after an E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in needle tenderized beef sickened at least 21 people in 16 states.

Luchansky et al. wrote in the July 2009 JFP that based on inoculation studies, cooking on a commercial gas grill is effective at eliminating relatively low levels of the pathogen that may be distributed throughout a blade-tenderized steak.


Quantitative analysis of vertical translocation and lateral cross-contamination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during mechanical tenderization of beef
30.nov.10
Journal of Food Safety
Lihan Huang, Shiowshuh Sheen
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-4565.2010.00273.x/abstract
ABSTRACT
Quantitative vertical translocation and lateral cross-contamination of Escherichia coli O157:H7 during mechanical tenderization of beef meat were investigated using a restaurant-style meat tenderizer, which was first used to tenderize a surface-inoculated sample, and then an additional four uninoculated samples. It was observed that the vertically translocated bacteria (in log10 cfu/g) was directly proportional to the logarithm of the tenderization depth, with an average translocation coefficient of 3.14 ± 0.66 log10 cfu/g per log10 mm of depth. For lateral cross-contamination, the bacterial counts recovered from the top layers of the first four pieces of meat decreased by approximately 0.5 log10 cfu/g after each tenderization. There was no decrease in the bacterial counts recovered from the top layers after the 4th tenderization. More tenderization studies were needed to quantitatively analyze the trend of lateral cross-contamination. However, it is evident that both vertical translocation and lateral cross-contamination can occur during mechanical tenderization of meat.
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
Foodborne illnesses caused by consumption of undercooked non-intact beef meats contaminated with Escherichia coli O157:H7 are an emerging public food safety concern as evidenced by a major outbreak recently. This study investigated both vertical translocation and lateral cross-contamination of E. coli O157:H7 during mechanical tenderization of beef. The results from this work can aid quantitative assessment of risks caused by non-intact beef meats.

Your rating: None (5 votes)
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Amy says:

If this research means that I have to start treating my steak like hamburger and cooking it to a temperature of 160F as verified by a tip-sensitive digital thermometer, my love of steak has just been killed. Could we please compel industry to label steak that has been needle or blade tenderized?

Posted on November 30th, 2010 - 12:40pm

Carl Custer says:

Amy Plead: Could we please compel industry to label steak that has been needle or blade tenderized? [Carl]: Been trying to do that for many years. FYI the first paper that I am aware of that showed needle tenderization shoved bugs into the interior of meat was in 1978*. After a series of outbreaks, in 2003, FSIS drafted a "Technical Paper". In 2005 draft "Guidelines on Blade Tenderized Beef for Restaurants and Retail Food Establishments", and a proposed rule . Ennybody seen these? In 2003 the Director, Labeling and Consumer Protection Staff opined: The gap here is the absence of any regulation to require a qualifier/special statement when mechanical tenderization is employed. The meat and poultry regulations state that when products are changed in terms of their form and composition, e.g., ground, comminuted, finely ground, sliced, diced, sectioned, formed, etc., it is a material fact that should be labeled. Mechanical tenderization falls in the cracks of this rule; the product could be viewed as being essentially intact. *Johnston,-R-W; Harris,-M-E; Moran,-A-B. The effect of mechanical tenderization on beef rounds inoculated with salmonellae. Journal-of-Food-Safety. 1978; 1(3): 201-209 Raw beef rounds were surface inoculated with salmonellae. Some of the rounds were mechanically blade tenderized. Both surface and core samples from each round studied were examined for the presence of and the logarithmic level of salmonellae. Mechanical tenderization increased the level of salmonellae found in core samples by about 1 logarithm. Large samples taken from cores of rounds which were not tenderized contained small numbers of salmonellae. Dipping inoculated rounds into a 50 p.p.m. chlorine solution did not prevent the occurrence of salmonellae in core samples of mechanically tenderized units. Salmonella survived in the core and on the surface of some but not all inoculated rounds cooked to an internal temp. of 130° F.

Posted on November 30th, 2010 - 5:07pm

Anonymous says:

Don't buy your meat at Costco, then Amy. All steaks and roasts are needle tenderized!

Posted on December 1st, 2010 - 1:49am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.