Eat here and barf: seven Jimmy John's union workers fired

Posted: March 24th, 2011 - 7:32am by Doug Powell

jimmy.johns_.sickdaypostermed.preview.jpg

Jimmy John’s launched a new ad campaign earlier this month stressing speed instead of safety after making 130 or so people barf with salmonella-in-sprouts-on-sandwiches in two separate outbreaks.

Over the past two days, seven core members of the Jimmy John’s Workers Union were fired at five Minneapolis-area locations for distributing hundreds of posters claiming that eating at Jimmy John’s Gourmet Sandwiches puts customers at risk of food-borne illness.

The poster shows identical sandwiches, one labeled as being made by a healthy worker and one by a sick worker. The poster asks if customers can spot a difference between the two. “We hope your immune system is ready because you’re about to take the sandwich test,” it reads.

I would have gone with the sprout and ingredient angle, what with all the sick people, but having sick sandwich artists work is an excellent way to spread norovirus, salmonella and lots of other nasties.

According to The Minnesota Daily, the posters were in response to the union’s unmet demands for paid sick days, which “force” employees to come in sick, putting customers at risk, they said.’’

Union supporter David Boehnke, said, “We were fired for saying we want better working conditions for ourselves. We were standing up for ourselves.”

Boehnke said their activities were legally protected because the employees were organizing for higher wages. However Franchise Owner Mike Mulligan of MikLin Enterprises disagrees.

According to a statement from MikLin, the posters disparaged the company’s reputation and showed “extreme disloyalty and malicious intent to damage” the company.

If you want to preserve the company’s reputation, try not to make customers barf – it’s bad for business.

The workers currently have a four-point system, in which workers are deducted one point for missing work without finding a replacement and half a point for coming to work 10 minutes late.

At four points, the worker is fired.

Your rating: None (3 votes)
Bookmark and Share

Comments

dangermaus says:

Seems like a perfect example of a union trying to leverage better benefits from their employer under a cynical whitewash of public service. JJ's fired them for interfering with management's job of running the company and controlling their public message, as they have every right to do. How could they run the company if they have employees pulling stunts like that? This is completely different than if they had say, revealed the fact that JJ's was covering up known safety hazards or violations of health department (or other) codes. In this case, it seems like in order to get a sick days benefit (which is perfectly reasonable and fine), but they used a dirty tactic of trying to publicly embarrass the company into giving them what they want while trying, deceitfully, to appear like they're doing something other than trying improve their compensation for their work. If you feel it's not worth working at JJ's without sick days, convince your workers to strike, don't go meddling in managements ability to run the company.

Posted on March 24th, 2011 - 3:07pm

Anonymous says:

You can see the posters in question here - http://www.iww.org/en/content/jimmy-johns-resists-campaign-reform-sick-day-policy-illegal-firing-six-workers

Posted on March 24th, 2011 - 10:06pm

Crash Course says:

People who want to evaluate the appropriateness of the posters should see this piece at the City Pages, which reprinted the poster distributed - http://blogs.citypages.com/food/2011/03/jimmy_johns_fir.php

Posted on March 25th, 2011 - 12:05am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.