The byzantine world of government speak; E. coli O157 again in walnuts in Canada

Posted: September 1st, 2011 - 5:25pm by

walnuts.sorenne.apr_.11.jpg

In CFIA-speak, ‘no confirmed illnesses’ means there are sick people, but we can’t say so until we’re super-duper sure through testing, no matter how many more people get sick. It’s part of a disturbing trend where government agencies are pressured to downgrade the findings of epidemiology and rely only on positive test results. It’s on display in the Del Monte vs. Oregon lawsuit, and was on full display in the Maple Leaf listeria outbreak of 2008 that saw 23 people die and 53 others sickened; CFIA led with a press statement then “There have been no confirmed illnesses associated with the consumption of these products.”

So no one should be comforted after the Canadian Food Inspection Agency reported this morning that certain prepackaged raw shelled walnut products described below are being voluntarily recalled because they may be contaminated with E. coli O157:H7.

“There have been no confirmed illnesses associated with the consumption of these products.”

Uh-oh.

When no one is sick, CFIA says, “there have been no illnesses associated with the consumption of these products.”

It’s the kind of wiggle-room bureaucrats thrive on – and shows the overall importance of public health.

The following raw shelled walnut products, imported from USA and packaged in Canada, are affected by this alert.

President’s Choice
Raw California Walnut Halves Unsalted 250 g 0 60383 87185 7 Best Before 2012 OC 07
Reddi Snack Hand Selected
California Walnuts 350 g 0 64777 28695 1 16581

Earlier this year, 14 people were sickened after eating E. coli-contaminated walnuts distributed by Montreal-based Amira Enterprises.

One patient in Quebec with an underlying medical condition died during the outbreak, which also affected people in Ontario and New Brunswick.
 

Your rating: None
Bookmark and Share

Comments

Mike says:

Maybe they say “There have been no confirmed illnesses associated with the consumption of these products.” because they cannot confirm that the illnesses were certainly from what they currently suspect as the source. Remember how the outbreak on Mexican peppers in the US originally said that they were from tomatoes, causing massive financial losses to an industry that was ultimately not the cause of the outbreak but just an innocent bystander that got mugged for $100 million? It is difficult to point a finger conclusively at the beginning of an investigation because there is a chance you might be wrong.

Posted on September 1st, 2011 - 10:16pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.