Foodborne outbreaks are not acts of god; the best providers take responsibility for their food

Posted: November 30th, 2011 - 10:46pm by Doug Powell

Amy was asking me about something speculative and that I said trying to predict such things was a mug’s game.

The language professor asked, what’s that?

A foolish, profitless or hopeless undertaking.

Predicting U.S. allotments for federal agencies is an endless mug’s game that I choose to ignore. I have enough trouble dealing with what’s going on today. Others thrive on that stuff.

The Washington Post has a story today about a putative boost in funding for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration agreed to by Congress (but not the Senate or the President) that I will ignore but does have a couple of juicy quotes about food safety.

“I mean God forbid to have another recall like this. . . . It just froze the market,” said Mohammad Abu-Ghazaleh, chief executive of Fresh Del Monte Produce in a call with analysts this month. He was talking about the 2006 E. coli O157:H7 outbreak in spinach.

God doesn’t have a lot to do with it. He or she or they probably have other things to do than micromanage outbreaks of foodborne illness or help you make that crucial putt on 18.The vast majority of foodborne outbreaks are not acts of god, they are the result of individually minor food safety mistakes in a culture that relegates food safety to a paragraph in the annual report that, over time, synergistically accumulate eventually making people barf or die.

The story notes that major recalls linked to foodborne illnesses exact real and reputational costs by shaking consumer confidence, but fails to answer the question: would listeria-in-cantaloupe, salmonella-in-peanut crap, E. coli in leafy things have been prevented by a stronger FDA?

Doubtful.

I’m all for a regulatory presence that is consistent and evidence-based, farm-to-fork. But that ain’t going to do much for people who will be barfing after eating food today.

Scott Faber, a vice president at the Grocery Manufacturers Association, said, “At a time when some industries are trying to handcuff their regulators, the food industry is advocating for a stronger regulator with more powers and more resources. … We’re competing with manufacturers all over the world. Maintaining and burnishing FDA’s reputation helps us open doors in those markets.”

Sounds nice but the responsibility to produce safe food lies with the producer, processor, retailer, restaurant, whoever is dishing it up. An industry group wanting more government oversight is also saying, we give up, it’s your problem.

Those that care about safe food will stop wasting their time with government and get on with it; then brag about it; then capture more market at retail.

The rest is a mug’s game.

 

Your rating: None (3 votes)
Bookmark and Share

Comments

DaveB says:

Once again the comments are off the mark in particular this one; "An industry group wanting more government oversight is also saying, we give up, it’s your problem." This is not why industry and the industry coalitions are supporting new legislation. We have not given up, rather just the opposite. Many companies spend enormous amounts of efforts to develop good food safety programs and this new legislation will help make sure that everyone works on developing and implementing good food safety programs. If everyone has good food safety programs then perhaps incidents where a small player causes a huge impact can be reduced. If Jensen Farms had followed HACCP principles, then the outbreak may have been avoided. They made some changes and did not follow the first principle of HACCP which is to do a risk assessment. This is what we are trying to accomplish with increased oversight that everyone looks at their processes with a critical food safety perspective. We have not given up, we are just getting started. this worked with low-acid-canned foods with the legislation that came out in the ‘70s with the rest of the world still not caught up and it can work for the other parts of the food industry.

Posted on December 1st, 2011 - 9:52am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.