Meat

  • Posted: December 23rd, 2011 - 12:44pm by Doug Powell

    The Mandarin Palace Restaurant in in Fredericton, New Brunswick (that’s in Canada), which was closed after rotting bear meat was discovered in a freezer, has reopened after a reinspection by Department of Health on Thursday.

    There's a note on the inspector's report that says a food course must be completed as discussed with the business owners Johnny and Tina Tu.

    "I will be reopened today," said Tu. "I am preparing everything brand new, my chicken balls and my egg rolls."

    Tu said she sat down with government investigators to discuss how and why rancid parts of a black bear were found in her restaurant's cooler. She told The Daily Gleaner she agreed to keep the bear for one of her customers, but the customer later told her to keep the bear.

    Tu didn't know what to do with it and was getting conflicting advice on how to dispose of it.

    "I hope everybody understands that I never touched the bear. I didn't eat it and I wouldn't serve it to people," Tu said.

    Tu said customers know that chicken is chicken and beef is beef.

    "They can taste. They know. There's the difference. I don't want people to be scared. I didn't touch anything with the bear," she said.

    The Health Department said the condition of the bear meat created a high risk for cross-contamination. Officials told Tu and her husband Johnny -- the restaurant's co-owners -- the cooler where the bear was stored had to be stripped bare of its contents and sanitized prior to reinspection. The department also said it would provide information on food-handling techniques and food safety.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 21st, 2011 - 6:44pm by Doug Powell

    The Mandarin Palace Restaurant in Fredericton, New Brunswick (that’s in Canada) was closed after decomposing bear meat was found in a cooler during a routine inspection this week.

    The meat, found in the on Tuesday, was turned over to the Department of Natural Resources. An investigation is ongoing.

    The restaurant was closed because of concerns the bear meat could have contaminated other contents in the cooler, but the risk to public health is very low, the Department of Health said in a statement.

    An inspection record posted on the government's website said, "Food must be purchased from an approved source. Wild animals are not approved."

    The restaurant will remain closed until the cooler has been properly cleaned.

    Samples of the bear meat have been sent out to test for trichinella, a parasite that can be transmitted to humans through consumption of raw or undercooked infected bear meat.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 19th, 2011 - 9:34pm by Doug Powell

    A Sydney butcher who used illegal additives to make meat appear more appealing has been fined over $9,000 by the Chief Industrial Magistrates Court, relating to four offences under the New South Wales NSW Food Act.

    Mr Craig Sahlin, Acting CEO of the NSW Food Authority, welcomed the result and said the court’s decision to fine Abdul Hassan, trading as Green Valley Halal Meats a total of $9,000 plus costs was a stern reminder to those who flout food safety laws.

    “NSW consumers have every right to expect that the food they buy is safe,” Mr Sahlin said.

    “Illegal and excessive use of preservatives in food will not be tolerated. The NSW Food Authority is diligent in its investigation and enforcement to ensure food products are safe and that consumers are protected.”

    An officer from the NSW Authority visited Green Valley Halal Meats in May 2011 following a complaint made by a consumer who had suffered an asthmatic reaction as a result of eating meat sold by the butcher.

    Samples of diced meat obtained from the Green Valley premises were found to contain the illegal preservative sulfur dioxide (SO2) which is often used to disguise old or inferior meat. Sausages and sausage meat product also found at the premises were found to contain SO2 well in excess of the permitted level for sausages.

    “The addition of sulfur dioxide to meat can make it appear redder, brighter and fresher to consumers,” Mr Sahlin said.

    “Not only is this deceptive it can also present a very real danger for people who are allergic to the chemical, such as people who suffer from asthma.”

    Abdul Hassan was previously fined for one offence under the NSW Food Act for adding SO2 to minced meat.

    “This is a clear message to those few operators who continue to do the wrong thing – you will be found out.”

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 1st, 2011 - 2:43pm by Doug Powell

    Associated Press reported yesterday that horses could soon be slaughtered in the U.S. for human consumption after Congress quietly lifted a 5-year-old ban on funding horse meat inspections, and activists say slaughterhouses could be up and running in as little as a month.

    Today, Taiwanese animation house NMA released one of their signature videos to address the situation.

    Grub Street New York says things to watch for in the video are “the horse that gets zapped into a pile of money (we're pretty sure that's not how the slaughter actually happens) and the bloody Seabiscuit saddle at the French dinner table.”

    I appreciated the Canadian slaughterhouse worker in a hockey jersey prodding a horse with a hockey stick.

    Some background on the horse slaughter debate from AP; Australia also has two horse slaughterhouses.

    Slaughter opponents pushed a measure cutting off funding for horse meat inspections through Congress in 2006 after other efforts to pass outright bans on horse slaughter failed in previous years. Congress lifted the ban in a spending bill President Barack Obama signed into law Nov. 18 to keep the government afloat until mid-December.

    It did not, however, allocate any new money to pay for horse meat inspections, which opponents claim could cost taxpayers $3 million to $5 million a year. The U.S. Department of Agriculture would have to find the money in its existing budget, which is expected to see more cuts this year as Congress and the White House aim to trim federal spending.

    The USDA issued a statement Tuesday saying there are no slaughterhouses in the U.S. that butcher horses for human consumption now, but if one were to open, it would conduct inspections to make sure federal laws were being followed.

    Pro-slaughter activists say the ban had unintended consequences, including an increase in neglect and the abandonment of horses, and that they are scrambling to get a plant going - possibly in Wyoming, North Dakota, Nebraska or Missouri.

    Sue Wallis, a Wyoming state lawmaker who's the group's vice president, said ranchers used to be able to sell horses that were too old or unfit for work to slaughterhouses but now they have to ship them to butchers in Canada and Mexico, where they fetch less than half the price.

    The federal ban devastated "an entire sector of animal agriculture for purely sentimental and romantic notions," she said.

    Although there are reports of Americans dining on horse meat a recently as the 1940s, the practice is virtually non-existent in this country, where the animals are treated as beloved pets and iconic symbols of the West.

    A federal report issued in June found that local animal welfare organizations reported a spike in investigations for horse neglect and abandonment since 2007. In Colorado, for example, data showed that investigations for horse neglect and abuse increased more than 60 percent - from 975 in 2005 to almost 1,600 in 2009.

    The report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office also determined that about 138,000 horses were transported to Canada and Mexico for slaughter in 2010, nearly the same number that were killed in the U.S. before the ban took effect in 2007. The U.S. has an estimated 9 million horses.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: November 26th, 2011 - 4:17pm by Doug Powell

    This is a CBS News video of the Arrowsight handwashing video monitoring system that has been used to dramatically increase handwashing compliance rates at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, N.Y.

    The same system is now being widely used by meat companies in an effort to reduce E. coli and other contamination inside processing plants.

    According to a Wall Street Journal article earlier this month, the new technique allows remote auditors to watch whether plant workers follow safety protocols aimed at reducing the spread of deadly bacteria.

    JBS SA, the world's largest beef processor, saw a 60% drop in the level of E. coli found by company inspectors after it installed monitoring cameras, said John Ruby, head of technical services for the company's beef division. The Brazilian meat processor started with a pilot program after it recalled 380,000 pounds of beef that sickened 23 people in nine states in 2009.

    A trial run at its Souderton, Pa., plant showed an immediate improvement in results, so the company placed cameras in all eight of its U.S. plants.

    "We are seeing increased interest among meat companies in remote video auditing as part of their food safety and animal welfare programs," said J. Patrick Boyle, president of the American Meat Institute, which represents most beef and pork packing companies. "Those who have implemented these programs have reported very good results."

    Cargill Inc., another major U.S. beef producer, uses video cameras to make sure its cattle are treated humanely before they are slaughtered. The Minneapolis-based company is now considering an expansion to monitor for food safety in its pork and turkey operations, according to Mike Siemens, head of the company's animal welfare division.

    Aurora, Ill.-based OSI Group LLC., a meat processor, for several years has used video cameras to monitor employees in three of its five U.S. plants for general food-safety practices. The company, which supplies McDonald's and other companies with bacon, sausage and chicken, decided in June to expand the monitoring to its other two plants.

    After the JBS results, the Agriculture Department—the government agency responsible for overseeing the safety of the U.S. meat supply—in August released voluntary guidelines for video monitoring at meat companies.

    In some cases, companies are watching to see if sloppy work is allowing meat contamination. They are also using the cameras to make sure employees aren't mistakenly sending the expensive cuts into hamburger grinders.

    Arrowsight has two facilities—one in Huntsville, Ala., and one in Visakhapatnam, India—employing 50 people to monitor meat-cutting operations. The company was wary about using workers in India, where parts of the country outlaw cattle slaughter, to monitor beef production.

    But it hasn't had problems with that, Mr. Aronson said. Arrowsight routes the most graphic slaughter video to its staff in Huntsville, he said.

     

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: November 25th, 2011 - 5:00am by Doug Powell

    Tina Rosenberg of the New York Times writes that in the intensive care units at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, N.Y., two L.E.D. displays adorn the wall across from each nurses’ station. They show the hand hygiene rate achieved: last Friday in the surgical I.C.U., the weekly rate was 85 percent and the current shift had a rate of 91 percent. “Great Shift!!” the sign said. At the medical I.C.U. next door, the weekly rate was 81 percent, and the current shift 82 percent.

    Those L.E.D. displays are very demanding — health care workers must clean their hands within 10 seconds of entering and exiting a patient’s room, or it doesn’t count. Three years ago, using the same criteria, the medical I.C.U.’s hand hygiene rate was appalling — it averaged 6.5 percent. But a video monitoring system that provides instant feedback on success has raised rates of handwashing or use of alcohol rubs to over 80 percent, and kept them there.

    Hospitals do impossible things like heart surgery on a fetus, but they are apparently stymied by the task of getting health care workers to wash their hands. Most hospitals report compliance of around 40 percent — and that’s using a far more lax measure than North Shore uses.

    How do hospitals even know their rates? Some hospitals track how much soap and alcohol gel gets used — a very rough measure. The current standard of care is to send around the hospital equivalent of secret shoppers — staff members who secretly observe their colleagues and record whether they wash their hands.

    This has serious drawbacks: it is expensive and the results are distorted if health care workers figure out they’re being observed. One reason the North Shore staff was so shocked by the 6.5 percent hand-washing rate the video cameras found was that measured by the secret shoppers, the rate was 60 percent.

    The North Shore study, published this week in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, is the first use of video in promoting hospital handwashing, and the first controlled study in a peer-reviewed journal of a high-tech effort to increase hand hygiene rates.

    North Shore instead uses a video monitoring system made by a company called Arrowsight. Cameras on the ceiling are trained on the sinks and hand sanitizer dispensers just inside and outside patient rooms. (Patients are not photographed.) A monitor at each door tracks when someone enters or leaves the room — anyone passing through a door has 10 seconds to wash hands. Arrowsight employees in India monitor random snippets of tape and grade each event as pass or fail.

    What makes the system function is not the videotaping alone — it’s the feedback.

    The nurse manager gets an e-mail message three hours into the shift with detailed information about hand hygiene rates, and again at the end. The L.E.D. signs are a constant presence in both the surgical and medical I.C.U.s

    This is Arrowsight’s first foray into health care. The company’s main business is meat: half the beef processing plants in America use its video system to monitor workers’ hygienic practices.

    Adam Aronson, Arrowsight’s chief executive, said that at one plant cameras focused on a hand sanitizer dispenser right outside the bathroom. With monitoring and feedback, hand hygiene rates went from about 4 percent to over 95 percent, and the achievement was sustained.

    At first Farber feared he wouldn’t be able to get approval; the conventional wisdom was that employees don’t like being videotaped. But then he thought about a recent experience at the dry cleaner: he had picked up some of his daughter’s clothes, but one of her suits was missing. He went back to the shop and told them the date and approximate time of his visit. They pulled up a video that indeed showed him leaving her suit behind. “If dry cleaners are doing that, we need to do that in the hospital,” he thought.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: November 10th, 2011 - 11:52pm by Doug Powell

    A restaurant in southern China that found itself at the center of outrage for selling "koala meat" claims it was in fact selling a type of rat that bears a resemblance to the drowsy marsupial.

    An Australian tourist visiting a restaurant in Guangzhou's Panyu district told a radio station 3AW that diners were able to select a live koala from a cage and could choose whether they wanted it "braised" or "stewed."

    Distressed by the scene, the traveller snapped a photo of what appeared to be the iconic animal, bent forward and facing downward in a cage, with only a carrot given as food.

    But the general manager of the restaurant denied that the animal was a koala, the Xinhua news agency reported.

    "The Australian tourist was actually the victim of a false alarm, as the restaurant never sells koala," the manager said.

    Another manager at the restaurant clarified that the animal was a bamboo rat.

    The Chinese bamboo rat is found in southern parts of the country and is commonly sold in food markets.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
    Wacky and Weird  |  1 Comment
    China, koala, Meat, Rat, restaurant
  • Posted: August 7th, 2011 - 10:06pm by Doug Powell

    Sunday afternoon/evening in Brisbane, out wandering around the ‘burbs, and see a fine example of backyard butchering. I’m not sure what kind of hunk of meat this was, but they went at it for awhile, including the use of an electric jigsaw, and eventually packed the roasts in salt and wrapped them up.

    Your rating: None (3 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: June 14th, 2011 - 2:05pm by Doug Powell

    At one restaurant in Italy, pork and relaxation are one and the same—and you can even experience a mortadella facial.

    The Atlantic reports the treatment consisted of deep breathing, eating, and drinking. Participants were served a plate of choice salumi—sliced prosciutto, culatello, salami, and Tuscan head cheese from Simone Fracassi. Then we were given large cloth napkins, to be placed over one's head and the plate, deeply inhaling the porky perfumes, stimulating salivary glands and appetite. Remove napkin, taste salumi, and drink sparkling wine—Champagne, Italian sparklers, or Lambrusco. Then head for dinner. I felt renewed.

    Main image: La Madia Travelfood/Gourmadia S.r.l.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: June 11th, 2011 - 3:57pm by Amy Hubbell

    Author: 
    Amy Hubbell

    Gonzalo already blogged about the last episode of the Real Housewives of New Jersey in which the ladies were preparing for Thanksgiving. I, however, am a bit behind on my television viewing and just got to the episode today on the DVR.

    Caroline’s family went to visit their daughter Lauren’s boyfriend’s family at their Italian food store, Little Italy Deli. One of the men behind the counter handed Caroline a bowl of soup with a gloved hand, and then Marco (or Vito Jr’s brother) struck this pose (right, exactly as pictured). What’s the point of wearing sanitary gloves if you’re going to rub them on your unprotected hand? Apparently there is some cultural confusion about whom the gloves protect, the food handler or the client. In food safety language this is referred to as magic glove syndrome.

    Next on the show, they got Lauren behind the meat slicer. She had her left hand gloved and her right hand unprotected. Presumably she was using her left hand only to touch the meat. When she was corrected about slicer use, however, she touched the meat with an ungloved finger. 
    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share