Uk

  • Posted: February 2nd, 2012 - 2:37pm by Doug Powell

    harvestmark.watermelon1.jpg

    The UK Health Protection Agency (HPA) is investigating an outbreak of a strain of Salmonella Newport infection among 30 people in England, Wales and Northern Ireland since the beginning of December 2011. Cases of illness caused by the same strain have been confirmed in Scotland, Ireland and Germany.

    Dr Bob Adak, head of the gastrointestinal diseases department at the HPA said: “Although it’s too soon to say with certainty what the likely cause of infection is, early indications suggest that a number of people became unwell after eating watermelon. This has also been noted in the cases in Scotland and Germany although further investigation is ongoing.

    Confirmed cases:

    • England - 26
    • Wales - 3
    • Northern Ireland - 1
    • Scotland - 4
    • Republic of Ireland - 5
    • Germany – 15

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 28th, 2012 - 11:20am by Doug Powell

    The UK Health Protection Agency is issuing a seasonal warning to pregnant women about the potential risk associated with close contact with animals that are giving birth.

    Pregnant women who come into close contact with sheep during lambing, for example, may risk their own health, and that of their unborn child, from infections that can occur in some ewes.

    Although the number of human pregnancies affected by contact with an infected animal is extremely small, it is important that pregnant women are aware of the potential risks and take appropriate precautions.

    It is also important to note that these risks are not only confined to the spring (when the majority of lambs are born), nor are the risks only associated with sheep: cows and goats that have recently given birth can also carry similar infections.

    To avoid the possible risk of infection, pregnant women are advised that they should:

    • not help to lamb ewes, or to provide assistance with a cow that is calving or a nanny goat that is kidding;
    • avoid contact with aborted or new-born lambs, calves or kids or with the afterbirth, birthing fluids or materials (eg bedding) contaminated by such birth products;
    • avoid handling (including washing) clothing, boots or any materials that may have come into contact with animals that have recently given birth, their young or afterbirths; and,
    • ensure partners attending lambing ewes or other animals giving birth take appropriate health and hygiene precautions, including the wearing of personal protective equipment and adequate washing to remove any potential contamination.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 24th, 2012 - 7:26pm by Doug Powell

    The UK Food Standards Agency’s latest public attitudes tracker shows that the main food safety issue people continue to be concerned about is food hygiene when eating out. Other issues include food poisoning and the use of additives in food.

    The Agency’s Food Hygiene Rating Scheme in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and the Food Hygiene Information scheme in Scotland, aim to reduce these concerns by encouraging businesses to improve hygiene standards and reduce the incidence of foodborne illness. The schemes help consumers choose where to eat out or shop for food by giving them information about the hygiene standards in restaurants, cafés, takeaways, hotels and food shops.

    In this latest tracker survey, three new questions were asked to measure people’s awareness of food hygiene schemes. The results show that 19% of respondents had seen or heard about this type of scheme. When prompted, 21% of respondents reported that they had seen or heard about the ‘Food Hygiene Rating scheme’, 12% had seen or heard about ‘Scores on the Doors’ and 10% had seen or heard about the ‘Food Hygiene Information Scheme’.

    This latest wave of research was undertaken in November 2011, with a total number of 2,076 respondents interviewed via the TNS consumer face-to-face omnibus survey.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 23rd, 2012 - 11:46pm by Doug Powell

    Scores on Doors was too direct for the Brits, but now they’ve come out with a Cause for Concern scheme to name and shame meat plants that have lousy audits.

    It’s part of the UK Food Standards Agency ongoing commitment to openness and transparency to regularly publish audit reports of approved meat plants in England, Scotland and Wales (audit here means those done by government inspectors, rather than third-parties; but I could be wrong, it’s not clear).

    Cause for concern is a process developed in response to Professor Pennington's report on the 2005 E. coli outbreak in Wales, which recommended that there needed to be improved management oversight of poorer performing meat plants. The process makes it clear which plants need to improve their standards to ensure risks to public health are kept to a minimum.

    There are currently eight premises on the list. This will be updated, initially on a weekly basis, to reflect changes as meat plants move on or off the list.

    Tim Smith, Chief Executive of the FSA, said, “If our inspectors decided that hygiene standards in a plant are so poor that public health could be at imminent risk, we would immediately stop that plant from operating. However, for those businesses that could improve quickly by following our advice, we hope that publication of this list will push them to raise their game and get off the list.”

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 12th, 2012 - 6:37am by Doug Powell

    That fancy-pants restaurant in Rotherwick, Hook, Hampshire, recently voted as Britain ‘most perfect town,’ was fined for poisoning guests with chicken liver parfait at a 2010 Christmas party.

    Guests at the prestigious Tylney Hall Hotel complained to Hart's Environmental Health Department in January last year, triggering off a lengthy investigation and resulting in the hotel being prosecuted.

    In Aldershot Magistrates' Court the hotel pleaded guilty to five breaches of food hygiene legislation:

    • Two instances of placing unsafe food on the market - namely chicken liver parfait.
    • Failing to comply with the requirement to implement and maintain procedures in relation to an identified critical control point, namely cooking.
    • Offering for sale cheese after the date shown in its 'use by' date
    • Failing to ensure that food handlers were supervised, instructed and trained in food hygiene matters commensurate with their work activity.
    • Admitting failing to follow their own exacting standards.

    The hotel owners, Tylney Hall Hotel Ltd, which had no previous convictions, was ordered to pay £35,900 in fines and a further £4,000 in costs.

    They were told the fines would have been well in excess of £50,000 had they not been given a 33 per cent discount for pleading guilty.

     

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 10th, 2012 - 4:48am by Doug Powell

    Never underestimate the Brits’ ways with words. In a discussion document ostensibly asking consumers what they think, the Food Standards Agency has pronounced that under its poorly named Earned Recognition scheme (bring back Scores on Doors), “food businesses that are able to demonstrate a history of good compliance with the legislation, or that are members of a private assurance scheme, would receive a lighter touch in terms of the number and type of official inspections.”

    Has FSA heard about foodborne illness outbreaks associated with third-party audits or other such schemes?

    The proposed changes will help to ensure consumer safety by concentrating resources where improvement is most needed, for example on businesses that are less compliant or higher risk.

    Is that what lighter touch means? Sounds more like a fluffer.

    The full report can be found at http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/earnedrecog.pdf.

    Your rating: None (2 votes)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: January 9th, 2012 - 1:41pm by Doug Powell

    Things have gone from bad to worse for British celebrity chef Antony Worrall Thompson, who was arrested after shoplifting cheese and wine at a Tesco grocery store.

    The Courier Mail reports that Worrall Thompson, 60, was arrested in front of astonished customers after five shoplifting episodes in just 16 days.

    Suspicious staff filmed the chef on a secret camera in the store's self-service checkout area, where shoppers scan barcodes on their purchases and pay using machines.

    The recession-hit star is said to have put some items under the scanner but sneaked others into bags without paying for them. Guards stopped him from leaving the supermarket and checked his bags after he was filmed last Friday - then called police.

    Sources said the stolen goods were "relatively low value" but included cheeses and bottles of wine.

    Worrall Thompson tasted success as he launched a string of top eateries - and soared to TV fame in the 1990s. But the recession hit his restaurant business, and he recently moved out of his $2.5 million mansion.

    Worrall Thompson has shown up in barfblog.com before. He was a signatory to a open letter calling on the British public to ask where their food comes from (free from the grocery store?), he published a recipe in Healthy & Organic Living that included a toxic plant as an ingredient, and has run afoul of public health types for using paving stones as a kitchen counter at a public BBQ.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 28th, 2011 - 2:04pm by Doug Powell

    Joan Hunt, 64, of Brixton, spent three weeks in hospital and needed treatment in intensive care after being infected with E. coli O157 in a UK outbreak linked to crab meat – or its preparation.

    She has been left with only 35 per cent kidney function after developing the potentially deadly complication HUS.

    Hunt recently told her story to the Plymouth Herald to raise awareness of symptoms and thank the hospital team who saved her life.

    She is recovering after becoming dangerously ill in August – the month of a reported Plymouth E. coli outbreak believed to be linked to crab meat.

    Joan does not know the source of her poisoning as she had not eaten crab. None of her family became sick.

    "I felt I was going to die. I wasn't in control of my body, my body was controlling me. It was frightening.”

    As reported in The Herald earlier this month, there is an ongoing investigation into an E. coli outbreak in Plymouth with a possible link to an unapproved crab supplier.

    Investigators took action after nine cases emerged in August. There have been no further reports of illness linked to crab since.

    Your rating: None
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 15th, 2011 - 6:25pm by Doug Powell

    The death of a Jewish grandmother who contracted salmonella from bean sprouts should force national changes to food labelling to prevent further deaths, a coroner has ruled.

    A four-day inquest into the death of René Kwartz, from north Manchester, concluded that the 82- year-old was infected by salmonella, in bean sprouts served at a Jewish wedding in August 2010. It had been alleged that the wedding's caterer, Shefa Mehadrin, had neglected food safety standards.

    But on Dec. 8, 2011, the inquest's jury unanimously returned a verdict of death by natural causes.

    During evidence from Bury Council's environmental health investigators, it emerged that no fault was found with the caterer, but that serving instructions on the bean sprout packages used at the wedding, were misleading.

    Manchester Coroner Nigel Meadows said he would push the government and the Food Standards Agency to review cooking guidelines on bean sprout packaging. The agencies must report on what action will be taken within 56 days.

    Concluding the inquest, Mr Meadows said: "It seems that clarity on the cooking of this product could be easily achieved.

    A table of sprout-related outbreaks is available at http://bites.ksu.edu/sprouts-associated-outbreaks.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share
  • Posted: December 15th, 2011 - 2:00pm by Doug Powell

    A major London department store is giving consumers the chance to buy unpasteurised milk, despite the government food watchdog's claim that the move is illegal on public health grounds.

    Raw milk, is banned from mainstream sale in England, Scotland and Wales. Its distribution is so tightly regulated that supermarkets and mainstream retailers are not allowed to stock it, although it can be sold directly by producers.

    But the growing number of raw milk devotees are now able to buy it fresh from a vending machine in Selfridges food hall in London's west end.

    The Food Standards Agency (FSA) said the move was in contravention of food hygiene regulations designed to protect consumer health, and released a statement saying "discussions are still ongoing."

    Raw milk dispensers are hugely popular on the continent, allowing customers to top up their own glass bottles. But the FSA says it may contain bacteria "such as salmonella and E coli that can cause illness."

    It said it had informed Westminster City Council, which deals with the day-to-day enforcement of food safety and public health protection in its area, of the position and that it believed this had been passed on to Selfridges.

    Selfridges said Westminster City Council knew it was selling the milk and claimed it had regulatory approval because the sales will be handled by a concession run by Longleys Farm, an established dairy farm.

    The bottles carry a health warning demanded by the FSA that reads: "This organically produced raw milk has not been heat treated and may therefore contain organisms harmful to health."

    Steve Hook of Longleys Farm, based in Hailsham, East Sussex, said he had been selling raw milk since 2007. "We pay fantastic attention to hygiene to ensure the strict bacteria tests conducted on the milk by the FSA are easily met."

    Both Hook and Selfridges said they were not aware that they were doing anything wrong, and would keep selling the milk until they were officially ordered not to.

    Your rating: None (1 vote)
    Bookmark and Share